THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fortes, Fábio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Kriterion (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072
Resumo: The passage between 276b1 and 277b3 of the dialogue Phaedrus has been used to indicate a dichotomy between orality and writing, as a sign of an irreconcilable relationship between dialectics and writing. Both of them are associated respectively to a serious activity (spoudé) and a game (paidiá). In our reading, we intend to show that it is not possible to subscribe to such association, considering, on the one hand, that the passage must be read as a kind of synthesis of a more comprehensive reflection (the determination of the philosophical lógos, i.e., dialectics) and, on the other hand, that it is possible to see in this context layers of meaning produced by an intertextual dialogue (the debate on writing between Alcidamas and Isocrate). In this sense, we propose an interpretation which takes into account an immanent analysis of the passage, showing that it does not display signifiers for subscribing the dichotomy between orality and writing, followed by a discussion that puts it back in the overall context of the dialogue, by analysing the philosophical meaning of the image of the “Garden of Adonis” and the opposition between paidiá and spoudé.
id UFMG-10_b7e87030d3682f17781972ae49338e9a
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/36072
network_acronym_str UFMG-10
network_name_str Kriterion (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)A IMAGEM DO “JARDIM DE ADÔNIS” E A REFLEXÃO SOBRE A ESCRITA COMO PARADIGMA PARA DETERMINAÇÃO DO LÓGOS NO FEDRO DE PLATÃO (276B1-277B3)PlatãoescritaoralidadedialéticalógosPlatowritingoralitydialeticslógosThe passage between 276b1 and 277b3 of the dialogue Phaedrus has been used to indicate a dichotomy between orality and writing, as a sign of an irreconcilable relationship between dialectics and writing. Both of them are associated respectively to a serious activity (spoudé) and a game (paidiá). In our reading, we intend to show that it is not possible to subscribe to such association, considering, on the one hand, that the passage must be read as a kind of synthesis of a more comprehensive reflection (the determination of the philosophical lógos, i.e., dialectics) and, on the other hand, that it is possible to see in this context layers of meaning produced by an intertextual dialogue (the debate on writing between Alcidamas and Isocrate). In this sense, we propose an interpretation which takes into account an immanent analysis of the passage, showing that it does not display signifiers for subscribing the dichotomy between orality and writing, followed by a discussion that puts it back in the overall context of the dialogue, by analysing the philosophical meaning of the image of the “Garden of Adonis” and the opposition between paidiá and spoudé.O trecho entre 276b1 e 277b3 do diálogo Fedro tem sido usado como indício de uma dicotomia entre oralidade e escrita, que seria, por sua vez, signo de uma inconciliável relação entre a dialética e a escrita. Ambas são associadas, respectivamente, a uma atividade séria (spoudé) e a uma brincadeira ou jogo (paidiá). Em nossa leitura, pretendemos mostrar não ser possível subscrever tal associação, tendo em vista que, por um lado, a passagem deve ser lida como uma espécie de síntese de uma reflexão mais abrangente (a determinação do lógos filosófico, i.e., a dialética) e, por outro, que nela se entreveem camadas de significação produzidas pelo diálogo intertextual (o debate sobre a escrita encetado entre Alcidamante e Isócrates). Nesse sentido, propomos uma interpretação que leva em conta uma análise imanente da passagem, mostrando que ela carece dos significantes para uma dicotomia oralidade vs. escrita, seguida de uma reflexão que a repõe no enquadre do diálogo, ao analisarmos os sentidos filosóficos da imagem do “Jardim de Adônis” e da oposição entre paidiá e spoudé.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2021-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 No. 150 (2021)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 Núm. 150 (2021)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 62 No 150 (2021)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 62 N. 150 (2021)Revista Kriterion; v. 62 n. 150 (2021)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072/29081Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFortes, Fábio2021-12-07T20:11:25Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/36072Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:30.523240Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)
A IMAGEM DO “JARDIM DE ADÔNIS” E A REFLEXÃO SOBRE A ESCRITA COMO PARADIGMA PARA DETERMINAÇÃO DO LÓGOS NO FEDRO DE PLATÃO (276B1-277B3)
title THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)
spellingShingle THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)
Fortes, Fábio
Platão
escrita
oralidade
dialética
lógos
Plato
writing
orality
dialetics
lógos
title_short THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)
title_full THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)
title_fullStr THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)
title_full_unstemmed THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)
title_sort THE IMAGE OF THE “GARDENS OF ADONIS” AND THE REFLECTION ON WRITING AS A PARADIGM FOR DETERMINING THE LÓGOS IN PLATO’S PHAEDRUS (276B1-277B3)
author Fortes, Fábio
author_facet Fortes, Fábio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fortes, Fábio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Platão
escrita
oralidade
dialética
lógos
Plato
writing
orality
dialetics
lógos
topic Platão
escrita
oralidade
dialética
lógos
Plato
writing
orality
dialetics
lógos
description The passage between 276b1 and 277b3 of the dialogue Phaedrus has been used to indicate a dichotomy between orality and writing, as a sign of an irreconcilable relationship between dialectics and writing. Both of them are associated respectively to a serious activity (spoudé) and a game (paidiá). In our reading, we intend to show that it is not possible to subscribe to such association, considering, on the one hand, that the passage must be read as a kind of synthesis of a more comprehensive reflection (the determination of the philosophical lógos, i.e., dialectics) and, on the other hand, that it is possible to see in this context layers of meaning produced by an intertextual dialogue (the debate on writing between Alcidamas and Isocrate). In this sense, we propose an interpretation which takes into account an immanent analysis of the passage, showing that it does not display signifiers for subscribing the dichotomy between orality and writing, followed by a discussion that puts it back in the overall context of the dialogue, by analysing the philosophical meaning of the image of the “Garden of Adonis” and the opposition between paidiá and spoudé.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/36072/29081
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 No. 150 (2021)
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 62 Núm. 150 (2021)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 62 No 150 (2021)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 62 N. 150 (2021)
Revista Kriterion; v. 62 n. 150 (2021)
1981-5336
0100-512X
reponame:Kriterion (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Kriterion (Online)
collection Kriterion (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistakriterion@gmail.com
_version_ 1799711183388803072