Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
Texto Completo: https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/879
Resumo: The present paper maps the position of 51 Brazilian political scientists about electoral reform in the period after the 1988 Constitution. For this purpose, the research selected scientific articles, but also books, interviews and texts in newspapers. Five main streams were identified in the specialized literature on the reform of the electoral system: (1) the one that defends the proportional vote of the open list; (2) the proportional closed list voting; (3) the proportional vote of a flexible list, here also incorporated the model of “single transferable vote”; (4) the one that defends some type of majority vote; (5) and the one that seeks to mix proportional mechanisms with the majority in a system known as “mixed vote”. The paper concludes that the proportional system is preferred by most Brazilian political scientists who have intervened in the public sphere in the last twenty years, with a certain preference for the transition to the closed list model.
id UFMG-21_d166f174b777bf1e6eb6289ade7affb2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/879
network_acronym_str UFMG-21
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?Propostas de reforma do sistema eleitoral no Brasil: : o que pensa a ciência política brasileira?Reforma PolíticaSistema EleitoralDireito EleitoralCiência Política BrasileiraPolitical ReformElectoral SystemElectoral LawBrazilian Political ScienceThe present paper maps the position of 51 Brazilian political scientists about electoral reform in the period after the 1988 Constitution. For this purpose, the research selected scientific articles, but also books, interviews and texts in newspapers. Five main streams were identified in the specialized literature on the reform of the electoral system: (1) the one that defends the proportional vote of the open list; (2) the proportional closed list voting; (3) the proportional vote of a flexible list, here also incorporated the model of “single transferable vote”; (4) the one that defends some type of majority vote; (5) and the one that seeks to mix proportional mechanisms with the majority in a system known as “mixed vote”. The paper concludes that the proportional system is preferred by most Brazilian political scientists who have intervened in the public sphere in the last twenty years, with a certain preference for the transition to the closed list model.O presente artigo mapeia o posicionamento de 51 cientistas políticos brasileiros em relação ao tema da reforma eleitoral no período posterior ao da Constituição de 1988. Para tanto, a pesquisa selecionou artigos científicos, mas também livros, entrevistas e textos em jornais. Foram identificadas cinco correntes principais na literatura especializada acerca da reforma do sistema eleitoral: (1) a que defende o voto proporcional de lista aberta; (2) a do voto proporcional de lista fechada; (3) a do voto proporcional de lista flexível, aqui incorporado também o modelo de “voto único transferível”; (4) a que defende algum tipo de voto majoritário; (5) e a que busca mesclar mecanismos proporcionais com os majoritários em um sistema conhecido como “voto misto”. Conclui-se que o sistema proporcional é o preferido pela maior parte dos cientistas políticos brasileiros que intervieram na esfera pública nos últimos vinte anos, com certa preferência pela transição ao modelo de lista fechada.RBEP2022-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/87910.9732/2022.V124.879Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 124 (2022): Edição 124Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 124 (2022): Edição 124Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 124 (2022): Edição 1242359-57360034-7191reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/879/648Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues, Theófilo Machado2022-07-02T00:08:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/879Revistahttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/indexONGhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/oairbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br2359-57360034-7191opendoar:2022-07-02T00:08:28Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?
Propostas de reforma do sistema eleitoral no Brasil: : o que pensa a ciência política brasileira?
title Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?
spellingShingle Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?
Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado
Reforma Política
Sistema Eleitoral
Direito Eleitoral
Ciência Política Brasileira
Political Reform
Electoral System
Electoral Law
Brazilian Political Science
title_short Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?
title_full Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?
title_fullStr Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?
title_full_unstemmed Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?
title_sort Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?
author Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado
author_facet Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reforma Política
Sistema Eleitoral
Direito Eleitoral
Ciência Política Brasileira
Political Reform
Electoral System
Electoral Law
Brazilian Political Science
topic Reforma Política
Sistema Eleitoral
Direito Eleitoral
Ciência Política Brasileira
Political Reform
Electoral System
Electoral Law
Brazilian Political Science
description The present paper maps the position of 51 Brazilian political scientists about electoral reform in the period after the 1988 Constitution. For this purpose, the research selected scientific articles, but also books, interviews and texts in newspapers. Five main streams were identified in the specialized literature on the reform of the electoral system: (1) the one that defends the proportional vote of the open list; (2) the proportional closed list voting; (3) the proportional vote of a flexible list, here also incorporated the model of “single transferable vote”; (4) the one that defends some type of majority vote; (5) and the one that seeks to mix proportional mechanisms with the majority in a system known as “mixed vote”. The paper concludes that the proportional system is preferred by most Brazilian political scientists who have intervened in the public sphere in the last twenty years, with a certain preference for the transition to the closed list model.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/879
10.9732/2022.V124.879
url https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/879
identifier_str_mv 10.9732/2022.V124.879
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/879/648
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv RBEP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv RBEP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 124 (2022): Edição 124
Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 124 (2022): Edição 124
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 124 (2022): Edição 124
2359-5736
0034-7191
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br
_version_ 1798042217080684544