Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/879 |
Resumo: | The present paper maps the position of 51 Brazilian political scientists about electoral reform in the period after the 1988 Constitution. For this purpose, the research selected scientific articles, but also books, interviews and texts in newspapers. Five main streams were identified in the specialized literature on the reform of the electoral system: (1) the one that defends the proportional vote of the open list; (2) the proportional closed list voting; (3) the proportional vote of a flexible list, here also incorporated the model of “single transferable vote”; (4) the one that defends some type of majority vote; (5) and the one that seeks to mix proportional mechanisms with the majority in a system known as “mixed vote”. The paper concludes that the proportional system is preferred by most Brazilian political scientists who have intervened in the public sphere in the last twenty years, with a certain preference for the transition to the closed list model. |
id |
UFMG-21_d166f174b777bf1e6eb6289ade7affb2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/879 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-21 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think?Propostas de reforma do sistema eleitoral no Brasil: : o que pensa a ciência política brasileira?Reforma PolíticaSistema EleitoralDireito EleitoralCiência Política BrasileiraPolitical ReformElectoral SystemElectoral LawBrazilian Political ScienceThe present paper maps the position of 51 Brazilian political scientists about electoral reform in the period after the 1988 Constitution. For this purpose, the research selected scientific articles, but also books, interviews and texts in newspapers. Five main streams were identified in the specialized literature on the reform of the electoral system: (1) the one that defends the proportional vote of the open list; (2) the proportional closed list voting; (3) the proportional vote of a flexible list, here also incorporated the model of “single transferable vote”; (4) the one that defends some type of majority vote; (5) and the one that seeks to mix proportional mechanisms with the majority in a system known as “mixed vote”. The paper concludes that the proportional system is preferred by most Brazilian political scientists who have intervened in the public sphere in the last twenty years, with a certain preference for the transition to the closed list model.O presente artigo mapeia o posicionamento de 51 cientistas políticos brasileiros em relação ao tema da reforma eleitoral no período posterior ao da Constituição de 1988. Para tanto, a pesquisa selecionou artigos científicos, mas também livros, entrevistas e textos em jornais. Foram identificadas cinco correntes principais na literatura especializada acerca da reforma do sistema eleitoral: (1) a que defende o voto proporcional de lista aberta; (2) a do voto proporcional de lista fechada; (3) a do voto proporcional de lista flexível, aqui incorporado também o modelo de “voto único transferível”; (4) a que defende algum tipo de voto majoritário; (5) e a que busca mesclar mecanismos proporcionais com os majoritários em um sistema conhecido como “voto misto”. Conclui-se que o sistema proporcional é o preferido pela maior parte dos cientistas políticos brasileiros que intervieram na esfera pública nos últimos vinte anos, com certa preferência pela transição ao modelo de lista fechada.RBEP2022-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/87910.9732/2022.V124.879Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 124 (2022): Edição 124Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 124 (2022): Edição 124Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 124 (2022): Edição 1242359-57360034-7191reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/879/648Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues, Theófilo Machado2022-07-02T00:08:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/879Revistahttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/indexONGhttps://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/oairbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br2359-57360034-7191opendoar:2022-07-02T00:08:28Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think? Propostas de reforma do sistema eleitoral no Brasil: : o que pensa a ciência política brasileira? |
title |
Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think? |
spellingShingle |
Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think? Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado Reforma Política Sistema Eleitoral Direito Eleitoral Ciência Política Brasileira Political Reform Electoral System Electoral Law Brazilian Political Science |
title_short |
Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think? |
title_full |
Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think? |
title_fullStr |
Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think? |
title_sort |
Proposals for reform of the electoral system in Brazil: what does Brazilian political science think? what does Brazilian political science think? |
author |
Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Reforma Política Sistema Eleitoral Direito Eleitoral Ciência Política Brasileira Political Reform Electoral System Electoral Law Brazilian Political Science |
topic |
Reforma Política Sistema Eleitoral Direito Eleitoral Ciência Política Brasileira Political Reform Electoral System Electoral Law Brazilian Political Science |
description |
The present paper maps the position of 51 Brazilian political scientists about electoral reform in the period after the 1988 Constitution. For this purpose, the research selected scientific articles, but also books, interviews and texts in newspapers. Five main streams were identified in the specialized literature on the reform of the electoral system: (1) the one that defends the proportional vote of the open list; (2) the proportional closed list voting; (3) the proportional vote of a flexible list, here also incorporated the model of “single transferable vote”; (4) the one that defends some type of majority vote; (5) and the one that seeks to mix proportional mechanisms with the majority in a system known as “mixed vote”. The paper concludes that the proportional system is preferred by most Brazilian political scientists who have intervened in the public sphere in the last twenty years, with a certain preference for the transition to the closed list model. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/879 10.9732/2022.V124.879 |
url |
https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/879 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.9732/2022.V124.879 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://pos.direito.ufmg.br/rbep/index.php/rbep/article/view/879/648 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
RBEP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
RBEP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Political Studies; Vol. 124 (2022): Edição 124 Revista Brasileña de Estudios Políticos; Vol. 124 (2022): Edição 124 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos; v. 124 (2022): Edição 124 2359-5736 0034-7191 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbep.ufmg@gmail.com || ati@direito.ufmg.br |
_version_ |
1798042217080684544 |