Gestão de custos agropecuários sob o enfoque da análise do fluxo de caixa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caiki Calepso Fantini
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMS
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/8431
Resumo: The objective of this thesis was to evaluate the current scenario of beef cattle, market aspects and the management of agricultural costs as a tool in the face of adversity under the focus of cash flow analysis and technical-economic indicators. After surveying the cost management methodologies and the main indicators, they were applied in a property located in the municipality of Bodoquena – Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), with a “complete cycle” type creation system, in the period from July 2015 to June 2020. For the analyses, a chart of accounts was constructed, and the ABC cost curve methodology was adopted. The recorded inflows and outflows were classified according to the chart of accounts and presented through cash flow and the income statement for the year (DRE). Another management tool used were the technical-economic indicators: stocking rate, arrobas (unit equivalent to 15 kilograms) produced, revenues, total cost, and gross unit profit, measured per head, arrobas of carcass produced and per hectare. From the results it was possible to verify the composition of property costs, in addition to the level of importance that they exert on the activity, being the effective operating costs in order of relevance, nutritional inputs, labor, energy and fuels, maintenance, pasture, reproductive and sanitary inputs. Based on the cash flow, it was observed that the property obtained positive flow in all production cycles, being able to bear the investments, the total costs and still generate an accumulated final balance of R$3,521,873. Through the DRE, variations in gross profit were observed, with the lowest value recorded in the 2018/19 harvest (R$211,453), and the highest in the 2019/20 harvest (R$1,936,398). The lower profit values found were due to the increasing increase in costs and the significant reduction in the volume slaughtered. The recovery in the following season was due to the recovery in production volume and the inflationary effects. The form of financial calculation through the agricultural year (July to June) was evaluated in comparison to the calendar year (January to December) in order to identify the best methodology. In comparison, the values were very discrepant between the analyzes, including by viewing by calendar year there was a period of loss not previously identified. Allied to this, it was not possible to identify the criterion of seasonality in the production and marketing of animals, a basic premise to justify the use of the agricultural year.
id UFMS_f186956670713f99688d0b5def5212e6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufms.br:123456789/8431
network_acronym_str UFMS
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMS
repository_id_str 2124
spelling 2024-02-23T14:16:17Z2024-02-23T14:16:17Z2023https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/8431The objective of this thesis was to evaluate the current scenario of beef cattle, market aspects and the management of agricultural costs as a tool in the face of adversity under the focus of cash flow analysis and technical-economic indicators. After surveying the cost management methodologies and the main indicators, they were applied in a property located in the municipality of Bodoquena – Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), with a “complete cycle” type creation system, in the period from July 2015 to June 2020. For the analyses, a chart of accounts was constructed, and the ABC cost curve methodology was adopted. The recorded inflows and outflows were classified according to the chart of accounts and presented through cash flow and the income statement for the year (DRE). Another management tool used were the technical-economic indicators: stocking rate, arrobas (unit equivalent to 15 kilograms) produced, revenues, total cost, and gross unit profit, measured per head, arrobas of carcass produced and per hectare. From the results it was possible to verify the composition of property costs, in addition to the level of importance that they exert on the activity, being the effective operating costs in order of relevance, nutritional inputs, labor, energy and fuels, maintenance, pasture, reproductive and sanitary inputs. Based on the cash flow, it was observed that the property obtained positive flow in all production cycles, being able to bear the investments, the total costs and still generate an accumulated final balance of R$3,521,873. Through the DRE, variations in gross profit were observed, with the lowest value recorded in the 2018/19 harvest (R$211,453), and the highest in the 2019/20 harvest (R$1,936,398). The lower profit values found were due to the increasing increase in costs and the significant reduction in the volume slaughtered. The recovery in the following season was due to the recovery in production volume and the inflationary effects. The form of financial calculation through the agricultural year (July to June) was evaluated in comparison to the calendar year (January to December) in order to identify the best methodology. In comparison, the values were very discrepant between the analyzes, including by viewing by calendar year there was a period of loss not previously identified. Allied to this, it was not possible to identify the criterion of seasonality in the production and marketing of animals, a basic premise to justify the use of the agricultural year.O objetivo desta tese foi avaliar o cenário atual da pecuária de corte, aspectos mercadológicos e a gestão de custos agropecuários como ferramenta frente as adversidades sob o enfoque da análise de fluxo de caixa e de indicadores técnico-econômicos. Após o levantamento das metodologias de gestão de custos e dos principais indicadores, eles foram aplicados em uma propriedade localizada no munícipio de Bodoquena – Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), com sistema de criação do tipo “ciclo completo”, no período de julho de 2015 a junho de 2020. Para as análises foi construído um plano de contas e adotou-se a metodologia da curva de custos ABC. As entradas e saídas registradas foram classificadas de acordo com o plano de contas e apresentadas através do fluxo de caixa e do demonstrativo de resultados do exercício (DRE). Outra ferramenta de gestão utilizada foram os indicadores técnico-econômicos: taxa de lotação, arrobas produzidas, receitas, custo total e lucro bruto unitário, mensurados por cabeça, arrobas de carcaça produzidas e por hectare. A partir dos resultados foi possível verificar a composição de custos da propriedade, além do nível de importância que as elas exercem sobre a atividade, sendo os custos operacionais efetivos em ordem de relevância, insumos nutricionais, mão de obra, energia e combustíveis, manutenção, insumos de pastagens, reprodutivos e sanitários. Com base no fluxo de caixa, observou-se que a propriedade obteve fluxo positivo em todos os ciclos produtivos, sendo capaz de arcar com os investimentos, os custos totais e ainda gerar um saldo final acumulado de R$3.521.873 ao final da avaliação. Através do DRE observou-se variações no lucro bruto, com menor valor registrado na safra 2018/19 (R$211.453), e o maior na safra 2019/20 (R$1.936.398). Os menores valores de lucro encontrados se deram pela crescente alta dos custos e a redução significativa do volume abatido. Já a recuperação na safra seguinte se deu pela recuperação do volume de produção e pelos efeitos inflacionários do período. A forma de apuração financeira através do ano agrícola (julho a junho) foi avaliada em comparação ao ano civil (janeiro a dezembro) no intuito de identificar a melhor metodologia. No comparativo, os valores foram muito discrepantes entre as análises, inclusive pela visualização por ano civil verificou-se um período de prejuízo não identificado anteriormente. Aliado a isso, não foi possível identificar o critério da sazonalidade na produção e comercialização dos animais, a premissa básica para se justificar a utilização do ano agrícola.Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do SulUFMSBrasilGestãocustos agropecuáriosfluxo de caixa.Gestão de custos agropecuários sob o enfoque da análise do fluxo de caixainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisRicardo Carneiro BrumattiCaiki Calepso Fantiniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMSinstname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)instacron:UFMSORIGINALTese Caiki C. Fantini - Gestão de Custos.pdfTese Caiki C. Fantini - Gestão de Custos.pdfapplication/pdf630271https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/8431/-1/Tese%20Caiki%20C.%20Fantini%20-%20Gest%c3%a3o%20de%20Custos.pdf02d3cfb52a4f05c2abac8862a799a952MD5-1123456789/84312024-02-23 10:16:17.933oai:repositorio.ufms.br:123456789/8431Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufms.br/oai/requestri.prograd@ufms.bropendoar:21242024-02-23T14:16:17Repositório Institucional da UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Gestão de custos agropecuários sob o enfoque da análise do fluxo de caixa
title Gestão de custos agropecuários sob o enfoque da análise do fluxo de caixa
spellingShingle Gestão de custos agropecuários sob o enfoque da análise do fluxo de caixa
Caiki Calepso Fantini
Gestão
custos agropecuários
fluxo de caixa.
title_short Gestão de custos agropecuários sob o enfoque da análise do fluxo de caixa
title_full Gestão de custos agropecuários sob o enfoque da análise do fluxo de caixa
title_fullStr Gestão de custos agropecuários sob o enfoque da análise do fluxo de caixa
title_full_unstemmed Gestão de custos agropecuários sob o enfoque da análise do fluxo de caixa
title_sort Gestão de custos agropecuários sob o enfoque da análise do fluxo de caixa
author Caiki Calepso Fantini
author_facet Caiki Calepso Fantini
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Ricardo Carneiro Brumatti
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caiki Calepso Fantini
contributor_str_mv Ricardo Carneiro Brumatti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gestão
custos agropecuários
fluxo de caixa.
topic Gestão
custos agropecuários
fluxo de caixa.
description The objective of this thesis was to evaluate the current scenario of beef cattle, market aspects and the management of agricultural costs as a tool in the face of adversity under the focus of cash flow analysis and technical-economic indicators. After surveying the cost management methodologies and the main indicators, they were applied in a property located in the municipality of Bodoquena – Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), with a “complete cycle” type creation system, in the period from July 2015 to June 2020. For the analyses, a chart of accounts was constructed, and the ABC cost curve methodology was adopted. The recorded inflows and outflows were classified according to the chart of accounts and presented through cash flow and the income statement for the year (DRE). Another management tool used were the technical-economic indicators: stocking rate, arrobas (unit equivalent to 15 kilograms) produced, revenues, total cost, and gross unit profit, measured per head, arrobas of carcass produced and per hectare. From the results it was possible to verify the composition of property costs, in addition to the level of importance that they exert on the activity, being the effective operating costs in order of relevance, nutritional inputs, labor, energy and fuels, maintenance, pasture, reproductive and sanitary inputs. Based on the cash flow, it was observed that the property obtained positive flow in all production cycles, being able to bear the investments, the total costs and still generate an accumulated final balance of R$3,521,873. Through the DRE, variations in gross profit were observed, with the lowest value recorded in the 2018/19 harvest (R$211,453), and the highest in the 2019/20 harvest (R$1,936,398). The lower profit values found were due to the increasing increase in costs and the significant reduction in the volume slaughtered. The recovery in the following season was due to the recovery in production volume and the inflationary effects. The form of financial calculation through the agricultural year (July to June) was evaluated in comparison to the calendar year (January to December) in order to identify the best methodology. In comparison, the values were very discrepant between the analyzes, including by viewing by calendar year there was a period of loss not previously identified. Allied to this, it was not possible to identify the criterion of seasonality in the production and marketing of animals, a basic premise to justify the use of the agricultural year.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2024-02-23T14:16:17Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2024-02-23T14:16:17Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/8431
url https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/8431
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFMS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMS
instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
instacron:UFMS
instname_str Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
instacron_str UFMS
institution UFMS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/8431/-1/Tese%20Caiki%20C.%20Fantini%20-%20Gest%c3%a3o%20de%20Custos.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 02d3cfb52a4f05c2abac8862a799a952
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri.prograd@ufms.br
_version_ 1807552808517369856