Cirurgia segura : construção e validação de tecnologia educacional

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes, Gisele Silva
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMT
Texto Completo: http://ri.ufmt.br/handle/1/2583
Resumo: This research has the objective of building and validating an educational technology about safe surgery for education of health professionals. This is a research of mixed methods, sequential and exploratory, with qualitative emphasis, performed in three steps, using the Meaningful Learning and the Pasquali Model as benchmarks. The research was performed in the Surgical Center and Surgical Clinic of the University Hospital of Cuiabá-MT, being conducted in the following steps: 1) Survey of knowledge of professionals about safe surgery, through semi-structured interviews with 24 professionals, whose data were analyzed by content analysis of the thematic type; 2) Taking the results of the first step, together with the literature review, a handbook about safe surgery was built; 3) Validation of content by 16 expert judges, using survey the monkey program and a questionnaire composed by 3 evaluative blocks: objectives, structure and relevance; followed by validation of appearance by the target audience, total of 26 health professionals of the surveyed institution, using an on-site questionnaire composed by 5 evaluative blocks: objectives, organization, structure, writing style and appearance. In order to analyze the questionnaires, simple descriptive statistics was used, and to evaluate the agreement, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated. The analysis of the interviews has resulted in the following categories: Conceptions of the multiprofessional health team about safe surgery – from primary care to hospital discharge; Management and safe surgery – planning, material resources, people management, infrastructure and protocols; and Educative actions for the implementation of safe surgery. In the understanding of interviewees, safe surgery starts in primary care and goes on after discharge. The dimensions involved in the safe surgery process are: management, human resources, materials and infrastructure. The actions required for the implementation, besides the correction of the problems found, have included education for professionals, students, teachers, caregivers and patients. The educative material produced titled “Safe Surgery: Technical handbook for health professionals” was comprised of 62 pages in the first version, and it was built in the Publisher program, with pictures obtained in the image database of the internet. From the evaluation of the content of the handbook by expert judges, we obtained approval in the three blocks: objectives, 91,25% (I), structure, 83,75% (II) and relevance, 87,5% (III), thus meeting the 80% starting level of consensus. The suggestions were: suitability for the language of the target audience, reduction of the number of pages and improvement in the resolution of images. The suggestions were mostly accepted, and the restructured handbook with 40 pages was submitted to the target audience. From their evaluation, we obtained approval in the blocks: objectives (94,8%), organization (93,9%), writing style (95,5%), appearance (87,5%) and motivation (93,5%). The suggestions were related to resolution of images and, once more, to reduction of content, which were accepted. We have concluded that professionals are concerned about patient safety, have partial knowledge about the safe surgery protocol and also point out actions for implementation. To that end, the institution needs to solve the identified problems. Regarding the handbook, it is suitable from the standpoint of validity of content and appearance to be used in the education of the multidisciplinary team.
id UFMT_9d1814d671ad3bf45a8a1bd50276a20c
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/2583
network_acronym_str UFMT
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMT
repository_id_str
spelling Cirurgia segura : construção e validação de tecnologia educacionalCirurgia seguraTecnologia educacionalEstudos de validaçãoCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEMSafe surgeryEducational technologyValidation studiesThis research has the objective of building and validating an educational technology about safe surgery for education of health professionals. This is a research of mixed methods, sequential and exploratory, with qualitative emphasis, performed in three steps, using the Meaningful Learning and the Pasquali Model as benchmarks. The research was performed in the Surgical Center and Surgical Clinic of the University Hospital of Cuiabá-MT, being conducted in the following steps: 1) Survey of knowledge of professionals about safe surgery, through semi-structured interviews with 24 professionals, whose data were analyzed by content analysis of the thematic type; 2) Taking the results of the first step, together with the literature review, a handbook about safe surgery was built; 3) Validation of content by 16 expert judges, using survey the monkey program and a questionnaire composed by 3 evaluative blocks: objectives, structure and relevance; followed by validation of appearance by the target audience, total of 26 health professionals of the surveyed institution, using an on-site questionnaire composed by 5 evaluative blocks: objectives, organization, structure, writing style and appearance. In order to analyze the questionnaires, simple descriptive statistics was used, and to evaluate the agreement, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated. The analysis of the interviews has resulted in the following categories: Conceptions of the multiprofessional health team about safe surgery – from primary care to hospital discharge; Management and safe surgery – planning, material resources, people management, infrastructure and protocols; and Educative actions for the implementation of safe surgery. In the understanding of interviewees, safe surgery starts in primary care and goes on after discharge. The dimensions involved in the safe surgery process are: management, human resources, materials and infrastructure. The actions required for the implementation, besides the correction of the problems found, have included education for professionals, students, teachers, caregivers and patients. The educative material produced titled “Safe Surgery: Technical handbook for health professionals” was comprised of 62 pages in the first version, and it was built in the Publisher program, with pictures obtained in the image database of the internet. From the evaluation of the content of the handbook by expert judges, we obtained approval in the three blocks: objectives, 91,25% (I), structure, 83,75% (II) and relevance, 87,5% (III), thus meeting the 80% starting level of consensus. The suggestions were: suitability for the language of the target audience, reduction of the number of pages and improvement in the resolution of images. The suggestions were mostly accepted, and the restructured handbook with 40 pages was submitted to the target audience. From their evaluation, we obtained approval in the blocks: objectives (94,8%), organization (93,9%), writing style (95,5%), appearance (87,5%) and motivation (93,5%). The suggestions were related to resolution of images and, once more, to reduction of content, which were accepted. We have concluded that professionals are concerned about patient safety, have partial knowledge about the safe surgery protocol and also point out actions for implementation. To that end, the institution needs to solve the identified problems. Regarding the handbook, it is suitable from the standpoint of validity of content and appearance to be used in the education of the multidisciplinary team.This research has the objective of building and validating an educational technology about safe surgery for education of health professionals. This is a research of mixed methods, sequential and exploratory, with qualitative emphasis, performed in three steps, using the Meaningful Learning and the Pasquali Model as benchmarks. The research was performed in the Surgical Center and Surgical Clinic of the University Hospital of Cuiabá-MT, being conducted in the following steps: 1) Survey of knowledge of professionals about safe surgery, through semi-structured interviews with 24 professionals, whose data were analyzed by content analysis of the thematic type; 2) Taking the results of the first step, together with the literature review, a handbook about safe surgery was built; 3) Validation of content by 16 expert judges, using survey the monkey program and a questionnaire composed by 3 evaluative blocks: objectives, structure and relevance; followed by validation of appearance by the target audience, total of 26 health professionals of the surveyed institution, using an on-site questionnaire composed by 5 evaluative blocks: objectives, organization, structure, writing style and appearance. In order to analyze the questionnaires, simple descriptive statistics was used, and to evaluate the agreement, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated. The analysis of the interviews has resulted in the following categories: Conceptions of the multiprofessional health team about safe surgery – from primary care to hospital discharge; Management and safe surgery – planning, material resources, people management, infrastructure and protocols; and Educative actions for the implementation of safe surgery. In the understanding of interviewees, safe surgery starts in primary care and goes on after discharge. The dimensions involved in the safe surgery process are: management, human resources, materials and infrastructure. The actions required for the implementation, besides the correction of the problems found, have included education for professionals, students, teachers, caregivers and patients. The educative material produced titled “Safe Surgery: Technical handbook for health professionals” was comprised of 62 pages in the first version, and it was built in the Publisher program, with pictures obtained in the image database of the internet. From the evaluation of the content of the handbook by expert judges, we obtained approval in the three blocks: objectives, 91,25% (I), structure, 83,75% (II) and relevance, 87,5% (III), thus meeting the 80% starting level of consensus. The suggestions were: suitability for the language of the target audience, reduction of the number of pages and improvement in the resolution of images. The suggestions were mostly accepted, and the restructured handbook with 40 pages was submitted to the target audience. From their evaluation, we obtained approval in the blocks: objectives (94,8%), organization (93,9%), writing style (95,5%), appearance (87,5%) and motivation (93,5%). The suggestions were related to resolution of images and, once more, to reduction of content, which were accepted. We have concluded that professionals are concerned about patient safety, have partial knowledge about the safe surgery protocol and also point out actions for implementation. To that end, the institution needs to solve the identified problems. Regarding the handbook, it is suitable from the standpoint of validity of content and appearance to be used in the education of the multidisciplinary team.Universidade Federal de Mato GrossoBrasilFaculdade de Enfermagem (FAEN)UFMT CUC - CuiabáPrograma de Pós-Graduação em EnfermagemRibeiro, Mara Regina Rosahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7175732777073780Ribeiro, Mara Regina Rosa314.430.011-04http://lattes.cnpq.br/7175732777073780Mandú, Edir Nei Teixeira201.387.761-72http://lattes.cnpq.br/1038169352967574314.430.011-04Reiners, Annelita Almeida Oliveira193.893.451-20http://lattes.cnpq.br/3326141243194968Teixeira, Elizabeth431.073.467-72http://lattes.cnpq.br/6939587645193038Lopes, Gisele Silva2021-07-01T14:57:12Z2016-04-252021-07-01T14:57:12Z2016-02-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisLOPES, Gisele Silva. Cirurgia segura: construção e validação de tecnologia educacional. 2016. 114 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Enfermagem) - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Cuiabá, 2016.http://ri.ufmt.br/handle/1/2583porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMTinstname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)instacron:UFMT2021-07-04T07:01:28Zoai:localhost:1/2583Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://ri.ufmt.br/oai/requestjordanbiblio@gmail.comopendoar:2021-07-04T07:01:28Repositório Institucional da UFMT - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cirurgia segura : construção e validação de tecnologia educacional
title Cirurgia segura : construção e validação de tecnologia educacional
spellingShingle Cirurgia segura : construção e validação de tecnologia educacional
Lopes, Gisele Silva
Cirurgia segura
Tecnologia educacional
Estudos de validação
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM
Safe surgery
Educational technology
Validation studies
title_short Cirurgia segura : construção e validação de tecnologia educacional
title_full Cirurgia segura : construção e validação de tecnologia educacional
title_fullStr Cirurgia segura : construção e validação de tecnologia educacional
title_full_unstemmed Cirurgia segura : construção e validação de tecnologia educacional
title_sort Cirurgia segura : construção e validação de tecnologia educacional
author Lopes, Gisele Silva
author_facet Lopes, Gisele Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Mara Regina Rosa
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7175732777073780
Ribeiro, Mara Regina Rosa
314.430.011-04
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7175732777073780
Mandú, Edir Nei Teixeira
201.387.761-72
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1038169352967574
314.430.011-04
Reiners, Annelita Almeida Oliveira
193.893.451-20
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3326141243194968
Teixeira, Elizabeth
431.073.467-72
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6939587645193038
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes, Gisele Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cirurgia segura
Tecnologia educacional
Estudos de validação
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM
Safe surgery
Educational technology
Validation studies
topic Cirurgia segura
Tecnologia educacional
Estudos de validação
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM
Safe surgery
Educational technology
Validation studies
description This research has the objective of building and validating an educational technology about safe surgery for education of health professionals. This is a research of mixed methods, sequential and exploratory, with qualitative emphasis, performed in three steps, using the Meaningful Learning and the Pasquali Model as benchmarks. The research was performed in the Surgical Center and Surgical Clinic of the University Hospital of Cuiabá-MT, being conducted in the following steps: 1) Survey of knowledge of professionals about safe surgery, through semi-structured interviews with 24 professionals, whose data were analyzed by content analysis of the thematic type; 2) Taking the results of the first step, together with the literature review, a handbook about safe surgery was built; 3) Validation of content by 16 expert judges, using survey the monkey program and a questionnaire composed by 3 evaluative blocks: objectives, structure and relevance; followed by validation of appearance by the target audience, total of 26 health professionals of the surveyed institution, using an on-site questionnaire composed by 5 evaluative blocks: objectives, organization, structure, writing style and appearance. In order to analyze the questionnaires, simple descriptive statistics was used, and to evaluate the agreement, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated. The analysis of the interviews has resulted in the following categories: Conceptions of the multiprofessional health team about safe surgery – from primary care to hospital discharge; Management and safe surgery – planning, material resources, people management, infrastructure and protocols; and Educative actions for the implementation of safe surgery. In the understanding of interviewees, safe surgery starts in primary care and goes on after discharge. The dimensions involved in the safe surgery process are: management, human resources, materials and infrastructure. The actions required for the implementation, besides the correction of the problems found, have included education for professionals, students, teachers, caregivers and patients. The educative material produced titled “Safe Surgery: Technical handbook for health professionals” was comprised of 62 pages in the first version, and it was built in the Publisher program, with pictures obtained in the image database of the internet. From the evaluation of the content of the handbook by expert judges, we obtained approval in the three blocks: objectives, 91,25% (I), structure, 83,75% (II) and relevance, 87,5% (III), thus meeting the 80% starting level of consensus. The suggestions were: suitability for the language of the target audience, reduction of the number of pages and improvement in the resolution of images. The suggestions were mostly accepted, and the restructured handbook with 40 pages was submitted to the target audience. From their evaluation, we obtained approval in the blocks: objectives (94,8%), organization (93,9%), writing style (95,5%), appearance (87,5%) and motivation (93,5%). The suggestions were related to resolution of images and, once more, to reduction of content, which were accepted. We have concluded that professionals are concerned about patient safety, have partial knowledge about the safe surgery protocol and also point out actions for implementation. To that end, the institution needs to solve the identified problems. Regarding the handbook, it is suitable from the standpoint of validity of content and appearance to be used in the education of the multidisciplinary team.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-25
2016-02-26
2021-07-01T14:57:12Z
2021-07-01T14:57:12Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv LOPES, Gisele Silva. Cirurgia segura: construção e validação de tecnologia educacional. 2016. 114 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Enfermagem) - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Cuiabá, 2016.
http://ri.ufmt.br/handle/1/2583
identifier_str_mv LOPES, Gisele Silva. Cirurgia segura: construção e validação de tecnologia educacional. 2016. 114 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Enfermagem) - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Cuiabá, 2016.
url http://ri.ufmt.br/handle/1/2583
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Brasil
Faculdade de Enfermagem (FAEN)
UFMT CUC - Cuiabá
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Brasil
Faculdade de Enfermagem (FAEN)
UFMT CUC - Cuiabá
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMT
instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
instacron:UFMT
instname_str Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
instacron_str UFMT
institution UFMT
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMT
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMT
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMT - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jordanbiblio@gmail.com
_version_ 1804648506536755200