Virtues and Vices in Modern Brazilian Historiography: a reading of Historians of Brazil, by Francisco Iglésias
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | História da Historiografia |
Texto Completo: | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1475 |
Resumo: | In Historians of Brazil, Francisco Iglésias reviews some of the great names in Brazilian historiography as divided by him into three distinct moments: up to 1838, from 1838 to 1931, and from 1931 onwards. This article shall focus on the third of these moments, which has traditionally been considered the moment of the “modern Brazilian historiography”. More specifically, I would like to draw attention to Iglésias’ use of virtue and vice language to assess those historians and their works. Virtues and vices have long been used not only in moral evaluations but also in epistemic ones. Being recognized as a historian includes cultivating repertoires of virtues which are deemed to be necessary for actually being a historian. As Iglésias evaluates his predecessors, we will have a glimpse into how a particular way of being a historian – that of the university professor in the 1980s – clashes against previous models of scholarly selfhood. |
id |
UFOP-2_0b274c51adc5d3f4574450d47855fa8f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1475 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOP-2 |
network_name_str |
História da Historiografia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Virtues and Vices in Modern Brazilian Historiography: a reading of Historians of Brazil, by Francisco IglésiasFalando de Virtudes e Estabelecendo Fronteiras na Historiografia Brasileira Moderna: uma leitura de Historiadores do Brasil, de Francisco IglésiasFrancisco IglésiasBrazilian historiographyEpistemic virtuesFrancisco IglésiasHistoriografía brasileñaVirtudes epistémicasFrancisco IglésiasHistoriografia brasileiraVirtudes epistêmicasIn Historians of Brazil, Francisco Iglésias reviews some of the great names in Brazilian historiography as divided by him into three distinct moments: up to 1838, from 1838 to 1931, and from 1931 onwards. This article shall focus on the third of these moments, which has traditionally been considered the moment of the “modern Brazilian historiography”. More specifically, I would like to draw attention to Iglésias’ use of virtue and vice language to assess those historians and their works. Virtues and vices have long been used not only in moral evaluations but also in epistemic ones. Being recognized as a historian includes cultivating repertoires of virtues which are deemed to be necessary for actually being a historian. As Iglésias evaluates his predecessors, we will have a glimpse into how a particular way of being a historian – that of the university professor in the 1980s – clashes against previous models of scholarly selfhood.Em Historiadores do Brasil, Francisco Iglésias avalia alguns dos grandes nomes da historiografia brasileira, dividindo-os em três momentos distintos: o primeiro, até 1838; o segundo, de 1838 a 1931; e o terceiro, de 1931 adiante. Este artigo focará no terceiro desses momentos, o qual tem sido tratado como o momento da "historiografia brasileira moderna". Mais especificamente, gostaria de focar no uso que Iglésias faz de uma linguagem de vícios e virtudes para avaliar aqueles historiadores e seus trabalhos. Vícios e virtudes têm sido usados há muito não apenas para avaliações morais, mas também para avaliações epistêmicas. Ser reconhecido como historiador inclui cultivar repertórios de virtudes consideradas necessárias para ser, de fato, historiador. Enquanto Iglésias avalia seus predecessores, veremos como uma maneira particular de ser historiador - aquela do professor universitário dos anos de 1980 - confronta modelos anteriores de subjetividade acadêmica.Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2019-08-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/147510.15848/hh.v12i30.1475História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 12 No. 30 (2019)História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 12 Núm. 30 (2019)História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 12 n. 30 (2019)1983-9928reponame:História da Historiografiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPenghttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1475/800Ohara, João Rodolfo Munhozinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-05-02T02:36:30Zoai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1475Revistahttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revistaPUBhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/oaivaldei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com1983-99281983-9928opendoar:2020-05-02T02:36:30História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Virtues and Vices in Modern Brazilian Historiography: a reading of Historians of Brazil, by Francisco Iglésias Falando de Virtudes e Estabelecendo Fronteiras na Historiografia Brasileira Moderna: uma leitura de Historiadores do Brasil, de Francisco Iglésias |
title |
Virtues and Vices in Modern Brazilian Historiography: a reading of Historians of Brazil, by Francisco Iglésias |
spellingShingle |
Virtues and Vices in Modern Brazilian Historiography: a reading of Historians of Brazil, by Francisco Iglésias Ohara, João Rodolfo Munhoz Francisco Iglésias Brazilian historiography Epistemic virtues Francisco Iglésias Historiografía brasileña Virtudes epistémicas Francisco Iglésias Historiografia brasileira Virtudes epistêmicas |
title_short |
Virtues and Vices in Modern Brazilian Historiography: a reading of Historians of Brazil, by Francisco Iglésias |
title_full |
Virtues and Vices in Modern Brazilian Historiography: a reading of Historians of Brazil, by Francisco Iglésias |
title_fullStr |
Virtues and Vices in Modern Brazilian Historiography: a reading of Historians of Brazil, by Francisco Iglésias |
title_full_unstemmed |
Virtues and Vices in Modern Brazilian Historiography: a reading of Historians of Brazil, by Francisco Iglésias |
title_sort |
Virtues and Vices in Modern Brazilian Historiography: a reading of Historians of Brazil, by Francisco Iglésias |
author |
Ohara, João Rodolfo Munhoz |
author_facet |
Ohara, João Rodolfo Munhoz |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ohara, João Rodolfo Munhoz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Francisco Iglésias Brazilian historiography Epistemic virtues Francisco Iglésias Historiografía brasileña Virtudes epistémicas Francisco Iglésias Historiografia brasileira Virtudes epistêmicas |
topic |
Francisco Iglésias Brazilian historiography Epistemic virtues Francisco Iglésias Historiografía brasileña Virtudes epistémicas Francisco Iglésias Historiografia brasileira Virtudes epistêmicas |
description |
In Historians of Brazil, Francisco Iglésias reviews some of the great names in Brazilian historiography as divided by him into three distinct moments: up to 1838, from 1838 to 1931, and from 1931 onwards. This article shall focus on the third of these moments, which has traditionally been considered the moment of the “modern Brazilian historiography”. More specifically, I would like to draw attention to Iglésias’ use of virtue and vice language to assess those historians and their works. Virtues and vices have long been used not only in moral evaluations but also in epistemic ones. Being recognized as a historian includes cultivating repertoires of virtues which are deemed to be necessary for actually being a historian. As Iglésias evaluates his predecessors, we will have a glimpse into how a particular way of being a historian – that of the university professor in the 1980s – clashes against previous models of scholarly selfhood. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1475 10.15848/hh.v12i30.1475 |
url |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1475 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15848/hh.v12i30.1475 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1475/800 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 12 No. 30 (2019) História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 12 Núm. 30 (2019) História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 12 n. 30 (2019) 1983-9928 reponame:História da Historiografia instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) instacron:UFOP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
instacron_str |
UFOP |
institution |
UFOP |
reponame_str |
História da Historiografia |
collection |
História da Historiografia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
valdei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1797220359768899584 |