Qualification of pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cauz, Marina
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Cassol, Jussara, Vanderlei, Franciele Marques, de Almeida, Josiane Schadeck
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
Texto Completo: https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3933
Resumo: Objective: To analyze and qualify pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study, with quantitative approach, in which 15 women workers were interviewed on a single day in May 2012. The assessments for pain qualification and analysis were performed by means of three instruments: multidimensional adapted questionnaire, Wisconsin Pain inventory (pain analysis) and McGill Pain questionnaire (qualification). For data analysis, descriptive statistics was employed, by calculating the average, standard deviation, percentage and absolute numbers. Results: The participants’ mean age was 33.4 (± 14.9) and they worked 9 hours a day. As for the painful posture in the workplace, the major complaint regarded abducted shoulders and flexed elbows (n=7, 46.6%). The most commonly painful anatomic sites were shoulders (n=8, 22.2%), cervical spine (n=7, 19.4%) and elbows (n=7, 19.4%). Pain analysis through the Wisconsin inventory, classified by the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), demonstrated moderate interference with work, sleep, mood, enjoyment of life and general activity. According to McGill questionnaire, the sensory level stood out, with highest frequencies to throbbing pain (n=10, 50%), needled (n=4, 20%) and tingling pain (n=4, 20%). Conclusion: The sample showed high frequency of pain in shoulders, elbows and cervical spine, in addition to painful symptomatology regarded moderate in most of the evaluated items, which might lead to significant interference with the labor activities and daily life.
id UFOR-2_9e12d3db800eb680c47e9ebda223c594
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/3933
network_acronym_str UFOR-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
repository_id_str
spelling Qualification of pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of BrazilCualificación del dolor de trabajadoras de una tienda de mallas del sur de BrasilQualificação da dor em trabalhadoras de uma malharia no sul do BrasilOccupational HealthTextile IndustryPhysical Therapy SpecialtyWomenPain.Salud LaboralIndustria TextilFisioterapiaMujeresDolor.Saúde do TrabalhadorIndústria TêxtilFisioterapiaMulheresDor.Objective: To analyze and qualify pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study, with quantitative approach, in which 15 women workers were interviewed on a single day in May 2012. The assessments for pain qualification and analysis were performed by means of three instruments: multidimensional adapted questionnaire, Wisconsin Pain inventory (pain analysis) and McGill Pain questionnaire (qualification). For data analysis, descriptive statistics was employed, by calculating the average, standard deviation, percentage and absolute numbers. Results: The participants’ mean age was 33.4 (± 14.9) and they worked 9 hours a day. As for the painful posture in the workplace, the major complaint regarded abducted shoulders and flexed elbows (n=7, 46.6%). The most commonly painful anatomic sites were shoulders (n=8, 22.2%), cervical spine (n=7, 19.4%) and elbows (n=7, 19.4%). Pain analysis through the Wisconsin inventory, classified by the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), demonstrated moderate interference with work, sleep, mood, enjoyment of life and general activity. According to McGill questionnaire, the sensory level stood out, with highest frequencies to throbbing pain (n=10, 50%), needled (n=4, 20%) and tingling pain (n=4, 20%). Conclusion: The sample showed high frequency of pain in shoulders, elbows and cervical spine, in addition to painful symptomatology regarded moderate in most of the evaluated items, which might lead to significant interference with the labor activities and daily life.Objetivo: Analizar y cualificar el dolor de mujeres de una tienda de mallas del sur de Brasil. Métodos: Estudio transversal y descriptivo de abordaje cuantitativo en el cual se entrevistaron 15 trabajadoras en un único día del mes de mayo de 2012. Las evaluaciones para la cualificación y el análisis del dolor se dieron a través de tres cuestionarios: el multidimensional adaptado, el inventario para el dolor de Wisconsin (análisis del dolor) y el cuestionario de McGill (cualificación). Para el análisis de los datos se realizó la estadística descriptiva con el cálculo de la media, la desviación típica, el porcentual y los valores absolutos. Resultados: Las participantes presentaron la media de edad de 33,4 (±14,9) años y 9 horas al día de trabajo. Respecto la postura de dolor en el sector de trabajo, se observó más quejas en los hombros en abducción y los codos en flexión (n=7, 46,6%). Los puntos anatómicos de dolor más frecuentes fueron los hombros (n=8, 22,2%), la columna cervical (n=7, 19,4%) y los codos (n=7, 19,4%). El análisis del dolor a través del inventario de Wisconsin clasificado por la Escala Visual Analógica de Dolor (EVA) ha demostrado interferencia moderada con el trabajo, el sueño, el humor, la apreciación de la vida y la actividad general. Según el cuestionario de McGill hubo importancia para el nível sensorial con más frecuencia para el dolor latigante (n=10, 50%), en agujada (n=4, 20%) y hormigueo (n=4, 20%). Conclusión: La muestra presentó elevada frecuencia para el dolor en los hombros, los codos, la columna cervical y sintomatología de dolor moderada para la mayoría de ítems evaluados lo que puede llevar a una interferencia importante en las actividades laborales y del cotidiano.Objetivo: Analisar e qualificar a dor em mulheres de uma malharia do sul do Brasil. Métodos: Estudo transversal, descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa, em que foram entrevistadas 15 trabalhadoras em um único dia de maio de 2012. As avaliações para qualificação e análise da dor aconteceram por meio de três questionários: multidimensional adaptado, inventário para dor de Wisconsin (análise da dor) e o questionário de McGill (qualificação). Para análise dos dados, foi realizada a estatística descritiva, com o calculo da média, desvio padrão, percentual e números absolutos. Resultados: As participantes apresentavam média de idade de 33,4 (±14,9) anos e trabalhavam 9 horas diárias. Referente à postura dolorosa no posto de trabalho, observou-se maior queixa em ombros abduzidos e cotovelos flexionados (n=7, 46,6%). Os locais anatômicos dolorosos mais frequentes foram ombros (n=8, 22,2%), coluna cervical (n=7, 19,4%) e cotovelos (n=7, 19,4%). A análise da dor pelo inventário de Wisconsin, classificada por meio da Escala Visual Analógica de Dor (EVA), demonstrou interferência moderada no trabalho, sono, humor, apreciação da vida e na atividade geral. De acordo com o questionário de McGill, houve destaque para o nível sensorial, com maior frequência para dor latejante (n=10, 50%), agulhada (n=4, 20%) e formigamento (n=4, 20%). Conclusão: A amostra apresentou alta frequência de dor nos ombros, cotovelos, coluna cervical e sintomatologia dolorosa considerada moderada na maioria dos itens avaliados, o que pode levar a uma interferência importante nas atividades laborais e do cotidiano.Universidade de Fortaleza2016-05-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed Article""Avaliado pelos pares""Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/393310.5020/18061230.2016.p75Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2016); 75-83Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 29 Núm. 1 (2016); 75-83Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 29 n. 1 (2016); 75-831806-1230reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúdeinstname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)instacron:UFORporenghttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3933/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3933/pdf_1Cauz, MarinaCassol, JussaraVanderlei, Franciele Marquesde Almeida, Josiane Schadeckinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-02-16T12:32:31Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/3933Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/RBPS/oai1806-12301806-1222opendoar:2022-02-16T12:32:31Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Qualification of pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil
Cualificación del dolor de trabajadoras de una tienda de mallas del sur de Brasil
Qualificação da dor em trabalhadoras de uma malharia no sul do Brasil
title Qualification of pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil
spellingShingle Qualification of pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil
Cauz, Marina
Occupational Health
Textile Industry
Physical Therapy Specialty
Women
Pain.
Salud Laboral
Industria Textil
Fisioterapia
Mujeres
Dolor.
Saúde do Trabalhador
Indústria Têxtil
Fisioterapia
Mulheres
Dor.
title_short Qualification of pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil
title_full Qualification of pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil
title_fullStr Qualification of pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Qualification of pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil
title_sort Qualification of pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil
author Cauz, Marina
author_facet Cauz, Marina
Cassol, Jussara
Vanderlei, Franciele Marques
de Almeida, Josiane Schadeck
author_role author
author2 Cassol, Jussara
Vanderlei, Franciele Marques
de Almeida, Josiane Schadeck
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cauz, Marina
Cassol, Jussara
Vanderlei, Franciele Marques
de Almeida, Josiane Schadeck
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Occupational Health
Textile Industry
Physical Therapy Specialty
Women
Pain.
Salud Laboral
Industria Textil
Fisioterapia
Mujeres
Dolor.
Saúde do Trabalhador
Indústria Têxtil
Fisioterapia
Mulheres
Dor.
topic Occupational Health
Textile Industry
Physical Therapy Specialty
Women
Pain.
Salud Laboral
Industria Textil
Fisioterapia
Mujeres
Dolor.
Saúde do Trabalhador
Indústria Têxtil
Fisioterapia
Mulheres
Dor.
description Objective: To analyze and qualify pain in women workers of a textile factory in the south of Brazil. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study, with quantitative approach, in which 15 women workers were interviewed on a single day in May 2012. The assessments for pain qualification and analysis were performed by means of three instruments: multidimensional adapted questionnaire, Wisconsin Pain inventory (pain analysis) and McGill Pain questionnaire (qualification). For data analysis, descriptive statistics was employed, by calculating the average, standard deviation, percentage and absolute numbers. Results: The participants’ mean age was 33.4 (± 14.9) and they worked 9 hours a day. As for the painful posture in the workplace, the major complaint regarded abducted shoulders and flexed elbows (n=7, 46.6%). The most commonly painful anatomic sites were shoulders (n=8, 22.2%), cervical spine (n=7, 19.4%) and elbows (n=7, 19.4%). Pain analysis through the Wisconsin inventory, classified by the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), demonstrated moderate interference with work, sleep, mood, enjoyment of life and general activity. According to McGill questionnaire, the sensory level stood out, with highest frequencies to throbbing pain (n=10, 50%), needled (n=4, 20%) and tingling pain (n=4, 20%). Conclusion: The sample showed high frequency of pain in shoulders, elbows and cervical spine, in addition to painful symptomatology regarded moderate in most of the evaluated items, which might lead to significant interference with the labor activities and daily life.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed Article"
"Avaliado pelos pares"
"Avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3933
10.5020/18061230.2016.p75
url https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3933
identifier_str_mv 10.5020/18061230.2016.p75
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3933/pdf
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3933/pdf_1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2016); 75-83
Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 29 Núm. 1 (2016); 75-83
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 29 n. 1 (2016); 75-83
1806-1230
reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
instacron:UFOR
instname_str Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
instacron_str UFOR
institution UFOR
reponame_str Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
collection Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808844181314994176