The Relationship between the political elite and democracy:: rethinking the role of radicalism in democratic stability

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Castro, Rodrigo Enrich
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/126519
Resumo: In recent decades, several analyzes have pointed out the role of the political elite inLatin America, with emphasis on the works of Linz and Stepan (1978) and O’Donnelland Schmitter (1986). In the 21st century, Mainwaring and Pérez-Liñán (2013) resumed theperspective of the previous authors about the importance of understanding howthe attitudes of the political elite can help to strengthen a democratic regime ortake it to a break. The work of O'Donnell and Schmitter (1986) is a studycomparative study focused specifically on transitions from authoritarian regimes tosome other type of regime, such a transition can be either the establishment of ademocracy as a way of restoring another type of authoritarian regime(O'DONNELL and SCHMITTER, 1986). The work advances the debate on the role of the elite by goingin addition to the importance of the role of the opposition, as it also highlights how disputesbetween the hard-liners and the soft-liners of the different regimes influenced the processesof “transition”, “liberalization” and “democratization”.
id UFRGS-26_72b560d9ebb43ffe961089f51dffc51e
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/126519
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling The Relationship between the political elite and democracy:: rethinking the role of radicalism in democratic stabilityLa Relación entre la élite política y la democracia:: repensar el papel del radicalismo en la estabilidad democráticaA Relação entre a elite política e a democracia:: repensando o papel do radicalismo na estabilidade democráticaIn recent decades, several analyzes have pointed out the role of the political elite inLatin America, with emphasis on the works of Linz and Stepan (1978) and O’Donnelland Schmitter (1986). In the 21st century, Mainwaring and Pérez-Liñán (2013) resumed theperspective of the previous authors about the importance of understanding howthe attitudes of the political elite can help to strengthen a democratic regime ortake it to a break. The work of O'Donnell and Schmitter (1986) is a studycomparative study focused specifically on transitions from authoritarian regimes tosome other type of regime, such a transition can be either the establishment of ademocracy as a way of restoring another type of authoritarian regime(O'DONNELL and SCHMITTER, 1986). The work advances the debate on the role of the elite by goingin addition to the importance of the role of the opposition, as it also highlights how disputesbetween the hard-liners and the soft-liners of the different regimes influenced the processesof “transition”, “liberalization” and “democratization”.En las últimas décadas, diversos análisis han señalado el papel de la élite política enLatinoamérica, con énfasis en los trabajos de Linz y Stepan (1978) y O’Donnelly Schmitter (1986). En el siglo XXI, Mainwaring y Pérez-Liñán (2013) retoman laperspectiva de los autores anteriores sobre la importancia de entender cómolas actitudes de la élite política pueden ayudar a fortalecer un régimen democrático ollevarlo a un descanso. El trabajo de O'Donnell y Schmitter (1986) es un estudioestudio comparativo centrado específicamente en las transiciones de regímenes autoritarios aalgún otro tipo de régimen, tal transición puede ser el establecimiento de unla democracia como forma de restaurar otro tipo de régimen autoritario(O'DONNELL y SCHMITTER, 1986). El trabajo avanza en el debate sobre el papel de la élite yendoademás de la importancia del papel de la oposición, pues también destaca cómo las disputasentre la línea dura y la línea blanda de los diferentes regímenes influyó en los procesosde “transición”, “liberalización” y “democratización”.Nas últimas décadas, diversas análises apontaram o papel da elite política na América Latina, com destaque para os trabalhos de Linz e Stepan (1978) e O’Donnel e Schmitter (1986). No século XXI, Mainwaring e Pérez-Liñán (2013) retomaram a perspectiva dos autores anteriores acerca da importância de se compreender como as atitudes da elite política podem ajudar a fortalecer um regime democrático ou levá-lo a uma ruptura. O trabalho de O’Donnell e Schmitter (1986) é um estudo comparativo focado especificamente nas transições de regimes autoritários para algum outro tipo de regime, tal transição pode ser tanto o estabelecimento de uma democracia quanto uma forma de restauração de um outro tipo de regime autoritário (O’DONNELL e SCHMITTER, 1986). A obra avança o debate sobre o papel da elite indo além da importância do papel da oposição, pois destaca também como as disputas entre os hard-liners e os soft-liners dos diferentes regimes influenciaram os processos de “transição”, “liberalização” e “democratização”.UFRGS2022-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/12651910.22456/1982-5269.126519Revista Debates; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2022): Contribuições para a análise da relação entre cultura e política; 148-153Revista Debates; v. 16 n. 2 (2022): Contribuições para a análise da relação entre cultura e política; 148-1531982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/126519/86075Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Castro, Rodrigo Enrich2022-12-30T03:34:58Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/126519Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2022-12-30T03:34:58Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Relationship between the political elite and democracy:: rethinking the role of radicalism in democratic stability
La Relación entre la élite política y la democracia:: repensar el papel del radicalismo en la estabilidad democrática
A Relação entre a elite política e a democracia:: repensando o papel do radicalismo na estabilidade democrática
title The Relationship between the political elite and democracy:: rethinking the role of radicalism in democratic stability
spellingShingle The Relationship between the political elite and democracy:: rethinking the role of radicalism in democratic stability
de Castro, Rodrigo Enrich
title_short The Relationship between the political elite and democracy:: rethinking the role of radicalism in democratic stability
title_full The Relationship between the political elite and democracy:: rethinking the role of radicalism in democratic stability
title_fullStr The Relationship between the political elite and democracy:: rethinking the role of radicalism in democratic stability
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship between the political elite and democracy:: rethinking the role of radicalism in democratic stability
title_sort The Relationship between the political elite and democracy:: rethinking the role of radicalism in democratic stability
author de Castro, Rodrigo Enrich
author_facet de Castro, Rodrigo Enrich
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Castro, Rodrigo Enrich
description In recent decades, several analyzes have pointed out the role of the political elite inLatin America, with emphasis on the works of Linz and Stepan (1978) and O’Donnelland Schmitter (1986). In the 21st century, Mainwaring and Pérez-Liñán (2013) resumed theperspective of the previous authors about the importance of understanding howthe attitudes of the political elite can help to strengthen a democratic regime ortake it to a break. The work of O'Donnell and Schmitter (1986) is a studycomparative study focused specifically on transitions from authoritarian regimes tosome other type of regime, such a transition can be either the establishment of ademocracy as a way of restoring another type of authoritarian regime(O'DONNELL and SCHMITTER, 1986). The work advances the debate on the role of the elite by goingin addition to the importance of the role of the opposition, as it also highlights how disputesbetween the hard-liners and the soft-liners of the different regimes influenced the processesof “transition”, “liberalization” and “democratization”.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/126519
10.22456/1982-5269.126519
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/126519
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.126519
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/126519/86075
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Debates
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Debates
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 16 Núm. 2 (2022): Contribuições para a análise da relação entre cultura e política; 148-153
Revista Debates; v. 16 n. 2 (2022): Contribuições para a análise da relação entre cultura e política; 148-153
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808845567160221696