Conflict resolution and democracy: an analisys of the National Council of Justice web page
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Debates |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/49888 |
Resumo: | The article discusses the role of the Judiciary as an institution in developing democracy through alternative conflict resolution practices. Such practices as Mediation and Conciliation are considered now in Brazil a possible new reference of Justice – a Justice of which the goal is citizens’ emancipation and autonomy. This article focuses specifically on Mediation, because of its potential to improve democracy. The first part of the study describes how Mediation procedure is captured by political institutional speech. The second part of the study describes how this speech relates with judicial programs and public policies in this sense. Both analyses are based on bibliography review and national legislation. The second part also is based on speeches and articles published by the Ministry of Justice on its website in 2014. The analysis reveals that the institutionalization of these practices in official speeches makes real the possibility that “citizens’ emancipation” becomes only political rhetoric. |
id |
UFRGS-26_e586c3ec446f4d4ba55997d27888f1c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/49888 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-26 |
network_name_str |
Revista Debates |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Conflict resolution and democracy: an analisys of the National Council of Justice web pageAdministração de conflitos e democracia: uma análise da página eletrônica do Conselho Nacional de JustiçaResolução de ConflitosMediaçãoDemocraciaMinistério da JustiçaBrasil.Conflict resolutionMediationDemocracyMinistry of JusticeBrazil.The article discusses the role of the Judiciary as an institution in developing democracy through alternative conflict resolution practices. Such practices as Mediation and Conciliation are considered now in Brazil a possible new reference of Justice – a Justice of which the goal is citizens’ emancipation and autonomy. This article focuses specifically on Mediation, because of its potential to improve democracy. The first part of the study describes how Mediation procedure is captured by political institutional speech. The second part of the study describes how this speech relates with judicial programs and public policies in this sense. Both analyses are based on bibliography review and national legislation. The second part also is based on speeches and articles published by the Ministry of Justice on its website in 2014. The analysis reveals that the institutionalization of these practices in official speeches makes real the possibility that “citizens’ emancipation” becomes only political rhetoric.Este trabalho discute o lugar do poder judiciário, enquanto instituição política de relevância nacional, na promoção da democracia por meio de práticas de resolução de conflitos orientadas à autonomia e à emancipação cidadã da população. Vistas como alternativas à adjudicação, as práticas da mediação e a conciliação de conflitos surgem neste cenário como promessas de um novo paradigma de justiça. Em função do potencial democrático que lhe é atribuído, este estudo estabelece foco no procedimento de mediação. Como estas novas práticas, especialmente a mediação, são apropriadas política e ideologicamente no cenário institucional é a primeira análise deste trabalho. Como estas orientações políticas institucionais são materializadas em programas institucionais e políticas públicas judiciárias na prática é a análise efetuada na sequência. A primeira análise tem como base a revisão da bibliografia e a legislação sobre o tema enquanto a segunda análise tem como base não apenas revisão bibliográfica, mas também, discursos, legislações, matérias jornalísticas referenciadas na página eletrônica do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ). Conclui-se que a institucionalização pasteuriza as práticas e reduz suas possibilidades emancipatórias à retórica.UFRGS2015-08-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Histórica e Análise de Discurso Institucionalapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/4988810.22456/1982-5269.49888Revista Debates; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2015): Capital Social e Democracia em Democracias Emergentes. Outras abordagens teórico metodológicas.; 185-203Revista Debates; v. 9 n. 2 (2015): Capital Social e Democracia em Democracias Emergentes. Outras abordagens teórico metodológicas.; 185-2031982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/49888/34728Moreira, Rafaela SelemFragale Filho, Robertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-10T13:10:20Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/49888Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2023-01-10T13:10:20Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Conflict resolution and democracy: an analisys of the National Council of Justice web page Administração de conflitos e democracia: uma análise da página eletrônica do Conselho Nacional de Justiça |
title |
Conflict resolution and democracy: an analisys of the National Council of Justice web page |
spellingShingle |
Conflict resolution and democracy: an analisys of the National Council of Justice web page Moreira, Rafaela Selem Resolução de Conflitos Mediação Democracia Ministério da Justiça Brasil. Conflict resolution Mediation Democracy Ministry of Justice Brazil. |
title_short |
Conflict resolution and democracy: an analisys of the National Council of Justice web page |
title_full |
Conflict resolution and democracy: an analisys of the National Council of Justice web page |
title_fullStr |
Conflict resolution and democracy: an analisys of the National Council of Justice web page |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conflict resolution and democracy: an analisys of the National Council of Justice web page |
title_sort |
Conflict resolution and democracy: an analisys of the National Council of Justice web page |
author |
Moreira, Rafaela Selem |
author_facet |
Moreira, Rafaela Selem Fragale Filho, Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fragale Filho, Roberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moreira, Rafaela Selem Fragale Filho, Roberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Resolução de Conflitos Mediação Democracia Ministério da Justiça Brasil. Conflict resolution Mediation Democracy Ministry of Justice Brazil. |
topic |
Resolução de Conflitos Mediação Democracia Ministério da Justiça Brasil. Conflict resolution Mediation Democracy Ministry of Justice Brazil. |
description |
The article discusses the role of the Judiciary as an institution in developing democracy through alternative conflict resolution practices. Such practices as Mediation and Conciliation are considered now in Brazil a possible new reference of Justice – a Justice of which the goal is citizens’ emancipation and autonomy. This article focuses specifically on Mediation, because of its potential to improve democracy. The first part of the study describes how Mediation procedure is captured by political institutional speech. The second part of the study describes how this speech relates with judicial programs and public policies in this sense. Both analyses are based on bibliography review and national legislation. The second part also is based on speeches and articles published by the Ministry of Justice on its website in 2014. The analysis reveals that the institutionalization of these practices in official speeches makes real the possibility that “citizens’ emancipation” becomes only political rhetoric. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-08-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Histórica e Análise de Discurso Institucional |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/49888 10.22456/1982-5269.49888 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/49888 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22456/1982-5269.49888 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/49888/34728 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Debates; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2015): Capital Social e Democracia em Democracias Emergentes. Outras abordagens teórico metodológicas.; 185-203 Revista Debates; v. 9 n. 2 (2015): Capital Social e Democracia em Democracias Emergentes. Outras abordagens teórico metodológicas.; 185-203 1982-5269 2236-479X reponame:Revista Debates instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Revista Debates |
collection |
Revista Debates |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808845565401759744 |