Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bezerra, Valdir da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Mandelbaum, Henoch Gabriel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Conjuntura Austral
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConjunturaAustral/article/view/113353
Resumo: The concept of Eurasia is one of the most important elements of geopolitics, dating back to the beginning of the last century, and whose development owes much to the works of geographers and political thinkers alike. Nevertheless, although comprising a big portion of the planet’s political space, this region suffers from a relative ‘organizational gap’, especially if compared with neighboring regions such as Western Europe and Southeast Asia for instance. This paper contends that the lack of an overarching political arrangement in Eurasia owes much to particular aspects of the Russia-China relationship, which encompasses Great Power aspirations and competing organizational schemesin the region. Different views about Eurasia itself, associated with a quest for leadership in regional institution-building, put both Russia and China on competitive tracks, essentially obstructing the formation of a broad political design in the broader continent. To substantiate our point, the present work applies certain concepts from historical institutionalism, whose mechanisms enabled a thorough evaluation of patterns of inception, continuation, and change of political institutions, alliances and principles affecting the Sino-Russian relationship over time, as well as its effects on Eurasia’s ‘organizational gap’ per se. 
id UFRGS-29_7a23738dc635ac38fcd08c6384220e15
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/113353
network_acronym_str UFRGS-29
network_name_str Conjuntura Austral
repository_id_str https://seer.ufrgs.br/ConjunturaAustral/oaihttps://seer.ufrgs.br/ConjunturaAustral/oai
spelling Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relationsDesconfiança no Heartland: explicando o "Vazio Organizacional" eurasiático por meio das relações Russo-ChinesasHistorical InstitutionalismRussian Foreign PolicyChinese Foreign PolicyEurasiaInternational InstitutionsInstitucionalismo HistóricoPolítica Externa RussaPolítica Externa ChinesaEurásiaInstituições InternacionaisThe concept of Eurasia is one of the most important elements of geopolitics, dating back to the beginning of the last century, and whose development owes much to the works of geographers and political thinkers alike. Nevertheless, although comprising a big portion of the planet’s political space, this region suffers from a relative ‘organizational gap’, especially if compared with neighboring regions such as Western Europe and Southeast Asia for instance. This paper contends that the lack of an overarching political arrangement in Eurasia owes much to particular aspects of the Russia-China relationship, which encompasses Great Power aspirations and competing organizational schemesin the region. Different views about Eurasia itself, associated with a quest for leadership in regional institution-building, put both Russia and China on competitive tracks, essentially obstructing the formation of a broad political design in the broader continent. To substantiate our point, the present work applies certain concepts from historical institutionalism, whose mechanisms enabled a thorough evaluation of patterns of inception, continuation, and change of political institutions, alliances and principles affecting the Sino-Russian relationship over time, as well as its effects on Eurasia’s ‘organizational gap’ per se. O conceito de Eurásia é um dos elementos mais importantes da geopolítica, o qual remonta ao início do século passado, e cujo desenvolvimento deve muito às obras de geógrafos e de pensadores políticos. No entanto, embora englobe uma grande parte do espaço político do planeta, esta região sofre de uma relativa ‘lacuna organizacional’, especialmente se comparada com regiões vizinhas, como a Europa Ocidental e o Sudeste Asiático, por exemplo. Este artigo propõe que a falta de um arranjo político abrangente na Eurásia se deve muito a aspectos particulares da relação Rússia-China, que engloba aspirações por parte de duas Grandes Potências e esquemas organizacionais concorrentes na região. Diferentes visões sobre a própria Eurásia, associadas à busca pela liderança na construção de instituições regionais, colocaram a Rússia e a China em caminhos competitivos, essencialmente obstruindo a formação de um amplo desenho político no continente. Para substanciar nosso argumento, o presente trabalho aplica certos conceitos do institucionalismo histórico, cujos mecanismos permitiram-nos uma avaliação mais ampla dos padrões de surgimento, continuação e mudança das instituições políticas, alianças e princípios que afetaram a relação sino-russa ao longo do tempo, bem como sua efeitos na 'lacuna organizacional' da Eurásia em si.UFRGS2022-02-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConjunturaAustral/article/view/11335310.22456/2178-8839.113353Conjuntura Austral; Vol. 13 No. 61 (2022); 16 - 32Conjuntura Austral; Vol. 13 Núm. 61 (2022); 16 - 32Conjuntura Austral; v. 13 n. 61 (2022); 16 - 322178-8839reponame:Conjuntura Australinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSenghttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConjunturaAustral/article/view/113353/66446Copyright (c) 2022 VALDIR da SILVA BEZERRA, HENOCH Gabriel MANDELBAUMinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBezerra, Valdir da SilvaMandelbaum, Henoch Gabriel2022-02-25T01:04:51Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/113353Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/ConjunturaAustralPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/ConjunturaAustral/oaiconjunturaaustral@ufrgs.br||reisdasilva@hotmail.com||nerint@ufrgs.br||andre.reis@ufrgs.br2178-88392178-8839opendoar:https://seer.ufrgs.br/ConjunturaAustral/oaihttps://seer.ufrgs.br/ConjunturaAustral/oai2022-02-25T01:04:51Conjuntura Austral - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relations
Desconfiança no Heartland: explicando o "Vazio Organizacional" eurasiático por meio das relações Russo-Chinesas
title Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relations
spellingShingle Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relations
Bezerra, Valdir da Silva
Historical Institutionalism
Russian Foreign Policy
Chinese Foreign Policy
Eurasia
International Institutions
Institucionalismo Histórico
Política Externa Russa
Política Externa Chinesa
Eurásia
Instituições Internacionais
title_short Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relations
title_full Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relations
title_fullStr Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relations
title_full_unstemmed Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relations
title_sort Distrust in the heartland: explaining the Eurasian “Organization Gap” through the Russo-Chinese relations
author Bezerra, Valdir da Silva
author_facet Bezerra, Valdir da Silva
Mandelbaum, Henoch Gabriel
author_role author
author2 Mandelbaum, Henoch Gabriel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bezerra, Valdir da Silva
Mandelbaum, Henoch Gabriel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Historical Institutionalism
Russian Foreign Policy
Chinese Foreign Policy
Eurasia
International Institutions
Institucionalismo Histórico
Política Externa Russa
Política Externa Chinesa
Eurásia
Instituições Internacionais
topic Historical Institutionalism
Russian Foreign Policy
Chinese Foreign Policy
Eurasia
International Institutions
Institucionalismo Histórico
Política Externa Russa
Política Externa Chinesa
Eurásia
Instituições Internacionais
description The concept of Eurasia is one of the most important elements of geopolitics, dating back to the beginning of the last century, and whose development owes much to the works of geographers and political thinkers alike. Nevertheless, although comprising a big portion of the planet’s political space, this region suffers from a relative ‘organizational gap’, especially if compared with neighboring regions such as Western Europe and Southeast Asia for instance. This paper contends that the lack of an overarching political arrangement in Eurasia owes much to particular aspects of the Russia-China relationship, which encompasses Great Power aspirations and competing organizational schemesin the region. Different views about Eurasia itself, associated with a quest for leadership in regional institution-building, put both Russia and China on competitive tracks, essentially obstructing the formation of a broad political design in the broader continent. To substantiate our point, the present work applies certain concepts from historical institutionalism, whose mechanisms enabled a thorough evaluation of patterns of inception, continuation, and change of political institutions, alliances and principles affecting the Sino-Russian relationship over time, as well as its effects on Eurasia’s ‘organizational gap’ per se. 
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConjunturaAustral/article/view/113353
10.22456/2178-8839.113353
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConjunturaAustral/article/view/113353
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/2178-8839.113353
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConjunturaAustral/article/view/113353/66446
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 VALDIR da SILVA BEZERRA, HENOCH Gabriel MANDELBAUM
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 VALDIR da SILVA BEZERRA, HENOCH Gabriel MANDELBAUM
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conjuntura Austral; Vol. 13 No. 61 (2022); 16 - 32
Conjuntura Austral; Vol. 13 Núm. 61 (2022); 16 - 32
Conjuntura Austral; v. 13 n. 61 (2022); 16 - 32
2178-8839
reponame:Conjuntura Austral
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Conjuntura Austral
collection Conjuntura Austral
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conjuntura Austral - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv conjunturaaustral@ufrgs.br||reisdasilva@hotmail.com||nerint@ufrgs.br||andre.reis@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1797077476598349824