Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardinal, Kátia Maria
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Andretta, Ines, Silva, Marcos Kipper da, Stefanello, Thais Bastos, Schroeder, Bruna, Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/256171
Resumo: This study was designed to simulate productive and economic losses due to the withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) from pig diets. Articles that compared diets with AGP (AGP+) or without AGP (AGP–) for pigs were collected from electronic databases and the performance results were entered in a database. A meta-analysis was performed following the sequence: graphical analysis, correlation, and variance-covariance. The performance results observed in the meta-analysis, feed cost, and AGP costs were used to build equations to estimate the economic effect of withdrawing AGP. The database comprised 81 scientific articles containing 103 experiments totalizing 42,923 pigs. Avilamycin (24.7 %) was the most frequent AGP in the database, followed by Colistin (15.4 %), Tiamulin (11.7 %), Tylosin (8.0 %), Lincomycin (9.4 %), and Bacitracin (5.4 %). Weight gain (p < 0.05) increased in AGP+ diets during post- weaning (6.5 %). However, there was no effect of AGP on weight gain of growing-finishing pigs. There was better (p < 0.05) feed conversion in pigs fed AGP+ diets in all rearing phases. Weight gain and feed conversion improved (p < 0.05) with the addition of Avilamycin, Bacitracin, and Tylosin. AGP withdrawal in the post-weaning phase increased feed costs by US$ 0.86 per animal and in growing-finishing phase the increase was US$ 3.11. Thus, pigs fed AGP+ diets have a better performance than pigs fed AGP- diets and the withdrawal of AGP increases feed costs.
id UFRGS-2_2662fe2f474120879ba612b7779e3d6d
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/256171
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Cardinal, Kátia MariaAndretta, InesSilva, Marcos Kipper daStefanello, Thais BastosSchroeder, BrunaRibeiro, Andrea Machado Leal2023-03-22T03:24:40Z20210103-9016http://hdl.handle.net/10183/256171001164060This study was designed to simulate productive and economic losses due to the withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) from pig diets. Articles that compared diets with AGP (AGP+) or without AGP (AGP–) for pigs were collected from electronic databases and the performance results were entered in a database. A meta-analysis was performed following the sequence: graphical analysis, correlation, and variance-covariance. The performance results observed in the meta-analysis, feed cost, and AGP costs were used to build equations to estimate the economic effect of withdrawing AGP. The database comprised 81 scientific articles containing 103 experiments totalizing 42,923 pigs. Avilamycin (24.7 %) was the most frequent AGP in the database, followed by Colistin (15.4 %), Tiamulin (11.7 %), Tylosin (8.0 %), Lincomycin (9.4 %), and Bacitracin (5.4 %). Weight gain (p < 0.05) increased in AGP+ diets during post- weaning (6.5 %). However, there was no effect of AGP on weight gain of growing-finishing pigs. There was better (p < 0.05) feed conversion in pigs fed AGP+ diets in all rearing phases. Weight gain and feed conversion improved (p < 0.05) with the addition of Avilamycin, Bacitracin, and Tylosin. AGP withdrawal in the post-weaning phase increased feed costs by US$ 0.86 per animal and in growing-finishing phase the increase was US$ 3.11. Thus, pigs fed AGP+ diets have a better performance than pigs fed AGP- diets and the withdrawal of AGP increases feed costs.application/pdfengScientia Agricola. Piracicaba. Vol. 78, supl (2021), e20200266, 9 p.Nutricao animalSuínoAditivo alimentarConversao alimentarCusto de produçãoRaçãoEstimulante de crescimento animalAddditiveFeed conversionFeed costProductive costSwineEstimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001164060.pdf.txt001164060.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain47969http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/256171/2/001164060.pdf.txt819bf4532b1318ee62ed2daaa00d35a2MD52ORIGINAL001164060.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf445169http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/256171/1/001164060.pdff6cf8aac18208db347db387050f0d83eMD5110183/2561712023-03-23 03:24:35.223926oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/256171Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-03-23T06:24:35Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
title Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
spellingShingle Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
Cardinal, Kátia Maria
Nutricao animal
Suíno
Aditivo alimentar
Conversao alimentar
Custo de produção
Ração
Estimulante de crescimento animal
Addditive
Feed conversion
Feed cost
Productive cost
Swine
title_short Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
title_full Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
title_sort Estimation of productive losses caused by withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoter from pig diets – Meta-analysis
author Cardinal, Kátia Maria
author_facet Cardinal, Kátia Maria
Andretta, Ines
Silva, Marcos Kipper da
Stefanello, Thais Bastos
Schroeder, Bruna
Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
author_role author
author2 Andretta, Ines
Silva, Marcos Kipper da
Stefanello, Thais Bastos
Schroeder, Bruna
Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardinal, Kátia Maria
Andretta, Ines
Silva, Marcos Kipper da
Stefanello, Thais Bastos
Schroeder, Bruna
Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nutricao animal
Suíno
Aditivo alimentar
Conversao alimentar
Custo de produção
Ração
Estimulante de crescimento animal
topic Nutricao animal
Suíno
Aditivo alimentar
Conversao alimentar
Custo de produção
Ração
Estimulante de crescimento animal
Addditive
Feed conversion
Feed cost
Productive cost
Swine
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Addditive
Feed conversion
Feed cost
Productive cost
Swine
description This study was designed to simulate productive and economic losses due to the withdrawal of antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) from pig diets. Articles that compared diets with AGP (AGP+) or without AGP (AGP–) for pigs were collected from electronic databases and the performance results were entered in a database. A meta-analysis was performed following the sequence: graphical analysis, correlation, and variance-covariance. The performance results observed in the meta-analysis, feed cost, and AGP costs were used to build equations to estimate the economic effect of withdrawing AGP. The database comprised 81 scientific articles containing 103 experiments totalizing 42,923 pigs. Avilamycin (24.7 %) was the most frequent AGP in the database, followed by Colistin (15.4 %), Tiamulin (11.7 %), Tylosin (8.0 %), Lincomycin (9.4 %), and Bacitracin (5.4 %). Weight gain (p < 0.05) increased in AGP+ diets during post- weaning (6.5 %). However, there was no effect of AGP on weight gain of growing-finishing pigs. There was better (p < 0.05) feed conversion in pigs fed AGP+ diets in all rearing phases. Weight gain and feed conversion improved (p < 0.05) with the addition of Avilamycin, Bacitracin, and Tylosin. AGP withdrawal in the post-weaning phase increased feed costs by US$ 0.86 per animal and in growing-finishing phase the increase was US$ 3.11. Thus, pigs fed AGP+ diets have a better performance than pigs fed AGP- diets and the withdrawal of AGP increases feed costs.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-03-22T03:24:40Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/256171
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0103-9016
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001164060
identifier_str_mv 0103-9016
001164060
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/256171
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola. Piracicaba. Vol. 78, supl (2021), e20200266, 9 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/256171/2/001164060.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/256171/1/001164060.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 819bf4532b1318ee62ed2daaa00d35a2
f6cf8aac18208db347db387050f0d83e
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801225083784527872