Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ceron, Marcos Speroni
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Vladimir de, Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira, Muniz, Henrique da Costa Mendes, Brito, Kenya Kreismann de, Chimainski, Michael, Krebs, Giovane, Kessler, Alexandre de Mello
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253325
Resumo: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of birth weight on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of immunocastrated male pigs. Seventy-two boars were assigned to three birth weight categories (BiW): light BiW pigs (LP: 0.98±0.083 kg BW; n = 24), normal BiW pigs (NP: 1.42±0.067 kg BW; n = 24), and heavy BiW pigs (HP: 1.85±0.096 kg BW; n = 24). For treatment design, we considered a weight range of two standard deviations (SD) in relation to the average population body weight (from 0.785 to 2.155 kg BW−1 ). The animals were housed in six pens with 12 animals per pen, with ad libitum access to water and feed throughout the study. In the growing and finishing phases, pigs were immunocastrated with two doses of vaccine at 112 and 161 days of age. The three BiW categories were different up to departure from the nursery (70 days). After this period, there was no difference between NP and HP in terms of BiW. Measurements showed that a low BiW reduced the loin eye area (9.4%), longissimus thoracis muscle depth (7.6%), and meat:fat ratio (21.6%). Backfat thickness (21.5%) and fat area (11.8%) were higher in LP as compared with the NP and HP categories. Light BiW pigs presented a lower weight steak (7.0%) and belly + rib (8.6%) compared with NP and HP, but did not differ within the LP group. Light BiW pigs required a greater lodging time (14 days), generating higher accumulated feed intake to reach the same slaughter BiW as the other categories. Growth performance and carcass characteristics are influenced by the birth weight (BiW) category. Light BiW pigs require more time and feed intake to reach the same slaughter weight. Birth weight has positive effects on meat quality and weight of commercial cuts.
id UFRGS-2_541e830d40a3ec14a1e40cd192290313
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/253325
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Ceron, Marcos SperoniOliveira, Vladimir deMoraes, Priscila de OliveiraMuniz, Henrique da Costa MendesBrito, Kenya Kreismann deChimainski, MichaelKrebs, GiovaneKessler, Alexandre de Mello2023-01-02T05:09:06Z20211516-3598http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253325001153837The objective of this study was to determine the effect of birth weight on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of immunocastrated male pigs. Seventy-two boars were assigned to three birth weight categories (BiW): light BiW pigs (LP: 0.98±0.083 kg BW; n = 24), normal BiW pigs (NP: 1.42±0.067 kg BW; n = 24), and heavy BiW pigs (HP: 1.85±0.096 kg BW; n = 24). For treatment design, we considered a weight range of two standard deviations (SD) in relation to the average population body weight (from 0.785 to 2.155 kg BW−1 ). The animals were housed in six pens with 12 animals per pen, with ad libitum access to water and feed throughout the study. In the growing and finishing phases, pigs were immunocastrated with two doses of vaccine at 112 and 161 days of age. The three BiW categories were different up to departure from the nursery (70 days). After this period, there was no difference between NP and HP in terms of BiW. Measurements showed that a low BiW reduced the loin eye area (9.4%), longissimus thoracis muscle depth (7.6%), and meat:fat ratio (21.6%). Backfat thickness (21.5%) and fat area (11.8%) were higher in LP as compared with the NP and HP categories. Light BiW pigs presented a lower weight steak (7.0%) and belly + rib (8.6%) compared with NP and HP, but did not differ within the LP group. Light BiW pigs required a greater lodging time (14 days), generating higher accumulated feed intake to reach the same slaughter BiW as the other categories. Growth performance and carcass characteristics are influenced by the birth weight (BiW) category. Light BiW pigs require more time and feed intake to reach the same slaughter weight. Birth weight has positive effects on meat quality and weight of commercial cuts.application/pdfengRevista brasileira de zootecnia. Vol. 50 (2021), e20200052, 9 p.Produção animalSuínoCarcaçaCarcass qualityMeat qualityPig productionEvaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001153837.pdf.txt001153837.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain35519http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253325/2/001153837.pdf.txt66100a4e492fac9f75e75e42d124405cMD52ORIGINAL001153837.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf295325http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253325/1/001153837.pdf1158e146cad458db9bf91433fddead91MD5110183/2533252024-05-25 06:48:13.694987oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/253325Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2024-05-25T09:48:13Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs
title Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs
spellingShingle Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs
Ceron, Marcos Speroni
Produção animal
Suíno
Carcaça
Carcass quality
Meat quality
Pig production
title_short Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs
title_full Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs
title_fullStr Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs
title_sort Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs
author Ceron, Marcos Speroni
author_facet Ceron, Marcos Speroni
Oliveira, Vladimir de
Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
Muniz, Henrique da Costa Mendes
Brito, Kenya Kreismann de
Chimainski, Michael
Krebs, Giovane
Kessler, Alexandre de Mello
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Vladimir de
Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
Muniz, Henrique da Costa Mendes
Brito, Kenya Kreismann de
Chimainski, Michael
Krebs, Giovane
Kessler, Alexandre de Mello
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ceron, Marcos Speroni
Oliveira, Vladimir de
Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
Muniz, Henrique da Costa Mendes
Brito, Kenya Kreismann de
Chimainski, Michael
Krebs, Giovane
Kessler, Alexandre de Mello
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Produção animal
Suíno
Carcaça
topic Produção animal
Suíno
Carcaça
Carcass quality
Meat quality
Pig production
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Carcass quality
Meat quality
Pig production
description The objective of this study was to determine the effect of birth weight on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of immunocastrated male pigs. Seventy-two boars were assigned to three birth weight categories (BiW): light BiW pigs (LP: 0.98±0.083 kg BW; n = 24), normal BiW pigs (NP: 1.42±0.067 kg BW; n = 24), and heavy BiW pigs (HP: 1.85±0.096 kg BW; n = 24). For treatment design, we considered a weight range of two standard deviations (SD) in relation to the average population body weight (from 0.785 to 2.155 kg BW−1 ). The animals were housed in six pens with 12 animals per pen, with ad libitum access to water and feed throughout the study. In the growing and finishing phases, pigs were immunocastrated with two doses of vaccine at 112 and 161 days of age. The three BiW categories were different up to departure from the nursery (70 days). After this period, there was no difference between NP and HP in terms of BiW. Measurements showed that a low BiW reduced the loin eye area (9.4%), longissimus thoracis muscle depth (7.6%), and meat:fat ratio (21.6%). Backfat thickness (21.5%) and fat area (11.8%) were higher in LP as compared with the NP and HP categories. Light BiW pigs presented a lower weight steak (7.0%) and belly + rib (8.6%) compared with NP and HP, but did not differ within the LP group. Light BiW pigs required a greater lodging time (14 days), generating higher accumulated feed intake to reach the same slaughter BiW as the other categories. Growth performance and carcass characteristics are influenced by the birth weight (BiW) category. Light BiW pigs require more time and feed intake to reach the same slaughter weight. Birth weight has positive effects on meat quality and weight of commercial cuts.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-01-02T05:09:06Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253325
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1516-3598
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001153837
identifier_str_mv 1516-3598
001153837
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253325
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de zootecnia. Vol. 50 (2021), e20200052, 9 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253325/2/001153837.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253325/1/001153837.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 66100a4e492fac9f75e75e42d124405c
1158e146cad458db9bf91433fddead91
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447815833255936