Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253325 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to determine the effect of birth weight on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of immunocastrated male pigs. Seventy-two boars were assigned to three birth weight categories (BiW): light BiW pigs (LP: 0.98±0.083 kg BW; n = 24), normal BiW pigs (NP: 1.42±0.067 kg BW; n = 24), and heavy BiW pigs (HP: 1.85±0.096 kg BW; n = 24). For treatment design, we considered a weight range of two standard deviations (SD) in relation to the average population body weight (from 0.785 to 2.155 kg BW−1 ). The animals were housed in six pens with 12 animals per pen, with ad libitum access to water and feed throughout the study. In the growing and finishing phases, pigs were immunocastrated with two doses of vaccine at 112 and 161 days of age. The three BiW categories were different up to departure from the nursery (70 days). After this period, there was no difference between NP and HP in terms of BiW. Measurements showed that a low BiW reduced the loin eye area (9.4%), longissimus thoracis muscle depth (7.6%), and meat:fat ratio (21.6%). Backfat thickness (21.5%) and fat area (11.8%) were higher in LP as compared with the NP and HP categories. Light BiW pigs presented a lower weight steak (7.0%) and belly + rib (8.6%) compared with NP and HP, but did not differ within the LP group. Light BiW pigs required a greater lodging time (14 days), generating higher accumulated feed intake to reach the same slaughter BiW as the other categories. Growth performance and carcass characteristics are influenced by the birth weight (BiW) category. Light BiW pigs require more time and feed intake to reach the same slaughter weight. Birth weight has positive effects on meat quality and weight of commercial cuts. |
id |
UFRGS-2_541e830d40a3ec14a1e40cd192290313 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/253325 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ceron, Marcos SperoniOliveira, Vladimir deMoraes, Priscila de OliveiraMuniz, Henrique da Costa MendesBrito, Kenya Kreismann deChimainski, MichaelKrebs, GiovaneKessler, Alexandre de Mello2023-01-02T05:09:06Z20211516-3598http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253325001153837The objective of this study was to determine the effect of birth weight on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of immunocastrated male pigs. Seventy-two boars were assigned to three birth weight categories (BiW): light BiW pigs (LP: 0.98±0.083 kg BW; n = 24), normal BiW pigs (NP: 1.42±0.067 kg BW; n = 24), and heavy BiW pigs (HP: 1.85±0.096 kg BW; n = 24). For treatment design, we considered a weight range of two standard deviations (SD) in relation to the average population body weight (from 0.785 to 2.155 kg BW−1 ). The animals were housed in six pens with 12 animals per pen, with ad libitum access to water and feed throughout the study. In the growing and finishing phases, pigs were immunocastrated with two doses of vaccine at 112 and 161 days of age. The three BiW categories were different up to departure from the nursery (70 days). After this period, there was no difference between NP and HP in terms of BiW. Measurements showed that a low BiW reduced the loin eye area (9.4%), longissimus thoracis muscle depth (7.6%), and meat:fat ratio (21.6%). Backfat thickness (21.5%) and fat area (11.8%) were higher in LP as compared with the NP and HP categories. Light BiW pigs presented a lower weight steak (7.0%) and belly + rib (8.6%) compared with NP and HP, but did not differ within the LP group. Light BiW pigs required a greater lodging time (14 days), generating higher accumulated feed intake to reach the same slaughter BiW as the other categories. Growth performance and carcass characteristics are influenced by the birth weight (BiW) category. Light BiW pigs require more time and feed intake to reach the same slaughter weight. Birth weight has positive effects on meat quality and weight of commercial cuts.application/pdfengRevista brasileira de zootecnia. Vol. 50 (2021), e20200052, 9 p.Produção animalSuínoCarcaçaCarcass qualityMeat qualityPig productionEvaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001153837.pdf.txt001153837.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain35519http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253325/2/001153837.pdf.txt66100a4e492fac9f75e75e42d124405cMD52ORIGINAL001153837.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf295325http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253325/1/001153837.pdf1158e146cad458db9bf91433fddead91MD5110183/2533252024-05-25 06:48:13.694987oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/253325Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2024-05-25T09:48:13Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs |
title |
Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs Ceron, Marcos Speroni Produção animal Suíno Carcaça Carcass quality Meat quality Pig production |
title_short |
Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs |
title_full |
Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs |
title_sort |
Evaluation of piglet birth weight on growth performance and qualitative and quantitative characteristics of carcasses of immunocastrated pigs |
author |
Ceron, Marcos Speroni |
author_facet |
Ceron, Marcos Speroni Oliveira, Vladimir de Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira Muniz, Henrique da Costa Mendes Brito, Kenya Kreismann de Chimainski, Michael Krebs, Giovane Kessler, Alexandre de Mello |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Vladimir de Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira Muniz, Henrique da Costa Mendes Brito, Kenya Kreismann de Chimainski, Michael Krebs, Giovane Kessler, Alexandre de Mello |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ceron, Marcos Speroni Oliveira, Vladimir de Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira Muniz, Henrique da Costa Mendes Brito, Kenya Kreismann de Chimainski, Michael Krebs, Giovane Kessler, Alexandre de Mello |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Produção animal Suíno Carcaça |
topic |
Produção animal Suíno Carcaça Carcass quality Meat quality Pig production |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Carcass quality Meat quality Pig production |
description |
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of birth weight on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of immunocastrated male pigs. Seventy-two boars were assigned to three birth weight categories (BiW): light BiW pigs (LP: 0.98±0.083 kg BW; n = 24), normal BiW pigs (NP: 1.42±0.067 kg BW; n = 24), and heavy BiW pigs (HP: 1.85±0.096 kg BW; n = 24). For treatment design, we considered a weight range of two standard deviations (SD) in relation to the average population body weight (from 0.785 to 2.155 kg BW−1 ). The animals were housed in six pens with 12 animals per pen, with ad libitum access to water and feed throughout the study. In the growing and finishing phases, pigs were immunocastrated with two doses of vaccine at 112 and 161 days of age. The three BiW categories were different up to departure from the nursery (70 days). After this period, there was no difference between NP and HP in terms of BiW. Measurements showed that a low BiW reduced the loin eye area (9.4%), longissimus thoracis muscle depth (7.6%), and meat:fat ratio (21.6%). Backfat thickness (21.5%) and fat area (11.8%) were higher in LP as compared with the NP and HP categories. Light BiW pigs presented a lower weight steak (7.0%) and belly + rib (8.6%) compared with NP and HP, but did not differ within the LP group. Light BiW pigs required a greater lodging time (14 days), generating higher accumulated feed intake to reach the same slaughter BiW as the other categories. Growth performance and carcass characteristics are influenced by the birth weight (BiW) category. Light BiW pigs require more time and feed intake to reach the same slaughter weight. Birth weight has positive effects on meat quality and weight of commercial cuts. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-02T05:09:06Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253325 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1516-3598 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001153837 |
identifier_str_mv |
1516-3598 001153837 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253325 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de zootecnia. Vol. 50 (2021), e20200052, 9 p. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253325/2/001153837.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253325/1/001153837.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
66100a4e492fac9f75e75e42d124405c 1158e146cad458db9bf91433fddead91 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447815833255936 |