Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217867 |
Resumo: | Background: Global concern about vitamin D deficiency has fuelled debates on photoprotection and the importance of solar exposure to meet vitamin D requirements. Objectives: To review the published evidence to reach a consensus on the influence of photoprotection by sunscreens on vitamin D status, considering other relevant factors. Methods: An international panel of 13 experts in endocrinology, dermatology, photobiology, epidemiology and biological anthropology reviewed the literature prior to a 1-day meeting in June 2017, during which the evidence was discussed. Methods of assessment and determining factors of vitamin D status, and public health perspectives were examined and consequences of sun exposure and the effects of photoprotection were assessed. Results: A serum level of ≥ 50 nmol L−1 25(OH)D is a target for all individuals. Broad-spectrum sunscreens that prevent erythema are unlikely to compromise vitamin D status in healthy populations. Vitamin D screening should be restricted to those at risk of hypovitaminosis, such as patients with photosensitivity disorders, who require rigorous photoprotection. Screening and supplementation are advised for this group. Conclusions: Sunscreen use for daily and recreational photoprotection does not compromise vitamin D synthesis, even when applied under optimal conditions. |
id |
UFRGS-2_a28dca5faa3af774a02461e826eedde9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/217867 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Passeron, ThierryBouillon, Roger A.Callender, Valerie D.Cestari, Tania FerreiraDiepgen, Thomas LudwigGreen, Adele C.van der Pols, Jolieke C.Bernard, Bruno AlainLy, FatoumataBernerd, FrançoiseMarrot, LaurentNielsen, M.Verschoore, MichèleJablonski, Nina G.Young, Antony R.2021-02-10T04:14:33Z20190007-0963http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217867001120622Background: Global concern about vitamin D deficiency has fuelled debates on photoprotection and the importance of solar exposure to meet vitamin D requirements. Objectives: To review the published evidence to reach a consensus on the influence of photoprotection by sunscreens on vitamin D status, considering other relevant factors. Methods: An international panel of 13 experts in endocrinology, dermatology, photobiology, epidemiology and biological anthropology reviewed the literature prior to a 1-day meeting in June 2017, during which the evidence was discussed. Methods of assessment and determining factors of vitamin D status, and public health perspectives were examined and consequences of sun exposure and the effects of photoprotection were assessed. Results: A serum level of ≥ 50 nmol L−1 25(OH)D is a target for all individuals. Broad-spectrum sunscreens that prevent erythema are unlikely to compromise vitamin D status in healthy populations. Vitamin D screening should be restricted to those at risk of hypovitaminosis, such as patients with photosensitivity disorders, who require rigorous photoprotection. Screening and supplementation are advised for this group. Conclusions: Sunscreen use for daily and recreational photoprotection does not compromise vitamin D synthesis, even when applied under optimal conditions.application/pdfengThe British journal of dermatology (1951). Oxford. vol. 181, no. 5 (Nov. 2019), p. 916-931Luz solarVitamina DProtetores solaresSunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D statusEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001120622.pdf.txt001120622.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain70858http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217867/2/001120622.pdf.txt79797454e52724024c3b865e6cd59a5bMD52ORIGINAL001120622.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1463475http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217867/1/001120622.pdf9f9edb78024539ad69308cd4b92c76a8MD5110183/2178672021-03-09 04:43:57.545881oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/217867Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-03-09T07:43:57Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status |
title |
Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status |
spellingShingle |
Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status Passeron, Thierry Luz solar Vitamina D Protetores solares |
title_short |
Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status |
title_full |
Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status |
title_fullStr |
Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status |
title_sort |
Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status |
author |
Passeron, Thierry |
author_facet |
Passeron, Thierry Bouillon, Roger A. Callender, Valerie D. Cestari, Tania Ferreira Diepgen, Thomas Ludwig Green, Adele C. van der Pols, Jolieke C. Bernard, Bruno Alain Ly, Fatoumata Bernerd, Françoise Marrot, Laurent Nielsen, M. Verschoore, Michèle Jablonski, Nina G. Young, Antony R. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bouillon, Roger A. Callender, Valerie D. Cestari, Tania Ferreira Diepgen, Thomas Ludwig Green, Adele C. van der Pols, Jolieke C. Bernard, Bruno Alain Ly, Fatoumata Bernerd, Françoise Marrot, Laurent Nielsen, M. Verschoore, Michèle Jablonski, Nina G. Young, Antony R. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Passeron, Thierry Bouillon, Roger A. Callender, Valerie D. Cestari, Tania Ferreira Diepgen, Thomas Ludwig Green, Adele C. van der Pols, Jolieke C. Bernard, Bruno Alain Ly, Fatoumata Bernerd, Françoise Marrot, Laurent Nielsen, M. Verschoore, Michèle Jablonski, Nina G. Young, Antony R. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Luz solar Vitamina D Protetores solares |
topic |
Luz solar Vitamina D Protetores solares |
description |
Background: Global concern about vitamin D deficiency has fuelled debates on photoprotection and the importance of solar exposure to meet vitamin D requirements. Objectives: To review the published evidence to reach a consensus on the influence of photoprotection by sunscreens on vitamin D status, considering other relevant factors. Methods: An international panel of 13 experts in endocrinology, dermatology, photobiology, epidemiology and biological anthropology reviewed the literature prior to a 1-day meeting in June 2017, during which the evidence was discussed. Methods of assessment and determining factors of vitamin D status, and public health perspectives were examined and consequences of sun exposure and the effects of photoprotection were assessed. Results: A serum level of ≥ 50 nmol L−1 25(OH)D is a target for all individuals. Broad-spectrum sunscreens that prevent erythema are unlikely to compromise vitamin D status in healthy populations. Vitamin D screening should be restricted to those at risk of hypovitaminosis, such as patients with photosensitivity disorders, who require rigorous photoprotection. Screening and supplementation are advised for this group. Conclusions: Sunscreen use for daily and recreational photoprotection does not compromise vitamin D synthesis, even when applied under optimal conditions. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-10T04:14:33Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217867 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
0007-0963 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001120622 |
identifier_str_mv |
0007-0963 001120622 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217867 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
The British journal of dermatology (1951). Oxford. vol. 181, no. 5 (Nov. 2019), p. 916-931 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217867/2/001120622.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217867/1/001120622.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
79797454e52724024c3b865e6cd59a5b 9f9edb78024539ad69308cd4b92c76a8 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447731392479232 |