Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Passeron, Thierry
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Bouillon, Roger A., Callender, Valerie D., Cestari, Tania Ferreira, Diepgen, Thomas Ludwig, Green, Adele C., van der Pols, Jolieke C., Bernard, Bruno Alain, Ly, Fatoumata, Bernerd, Françoise, Marrot, Laurent, Nielsen, M., Verschoore, Michèle, Jablonski, Nina G., Young, Antony R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217867
Resumo: Background: Global concern about vitamin D deficiency has fuelled debates on photoprotection and the importance of solar exposure to meet vitamin D requirements. Objectives: To review the published evidence to reach a consensus on the influence of photoprotection by sunscreens on vitamin D status, considering other relevant factors. Methods: An international panel of 13 experts in endocrinology, dermatology, photobiology, epidemiology and biological anthropology reviewed the literature prior to a 1-day meeting in June 2017, during which the evidence was discussed. Methods of assessment and determining factors of vitamin D status, and public health perspectives were examined and consequences of sun exposure and the effects of photoprotection were assessed. Results: A serum level of ≥ 50 nmol L−1 25(OH)D is a target for all individuals. Broad-spectrum sunscreens that prevent erythema are unlikely to compromise vitamin D status in healthy populations. Vitamin D screening should be restricted to those at risk of hypovitaminosis, such as patients with photosensitivity disorders, who require rigorous photoprotection. Screening and supplementation are advised for this group. Conclusions: Sunscreen use for daily and recreational photoprotection does not compromise vitamin D synthesis, even when applied under optimal conditions.
id UFRGS-2_a28dca5faa3af774a02461e826eedde9
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/217867
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Passeron, ThierryBouillon, Roger A.Callender, Valerie D.Cestari, Tania FerreiraDiepgen, Thomas LudwigGreen, Adele C.van der Pols, Jolieke C.Bernard, Bruno AlainLy, FatoumataBernerd, FrançoiseMarrot, LaurentNielsen, M.Verschoore, MichèleJablonski, Nina G.Young, Antony R.2021-02-10T04:14:33Z20190007-0963http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217867001120622Background: Global concern about vitamin D deficiency has fuelled debates on photoprotection and the importance of solar exposure to meet vitamin D requirements. Objectives: To review the published evidence to reach a consensus on the influence of photoprotection by sunscreens on vitamin D status, considering other relevant factors. Methods: An international panel of 13 experts in endocrinology, dermatology, photobiology, epidemiology and biological anthropology reviewed the literature prior to a 1-day meeting in June 2017, during which the evidence was discussed. Methods of assessment and determining factors of vitamin D status, and public health perspectives were examined and consequences of sun exposure and the effects of photoprotection were assessed. Results: A serum level of ≥ 50 nmol L−1 25(OH)D is a target for all individuals. Broad-spectrum sunscreens that prevent erythema are unlikely to compromise vitamin D status in healthy populations. Vitamin D screening should be restricted to those at risk of hypovitaminosis, such as patients with photosensitivity disorders, who require rigorous photoprotection. Screening and supplementation are advised for this group. Conclusions: Sunscreen use for daily and recreational photoprotection does not compromise vitamin D synthesis, even when applied under optimal conditions.application/pdfengThe British journal of dermatology (1951). Oxford. vol. 181, no. 5 (Nov. 2019), p. 916-931Luz solarVitamina DProtetores solaresSunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D statusEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001120622.pdf.txt001120622.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain70858http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217867/2/001120622.pdf.txt79797454e52724024c3b865e6cd59a5bMD52ORIGINAL001120622.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1463475http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217867/1/001120622.pdf9f9edb78024539ad69308cd4b92c76a8MD5110183/2178672021-03-09 04:43:57.545881oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/217867Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-03-09T07:43:57Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status
title Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status
spellingShingle Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status
Passeron, Thierry
Luz solar
Vitamina D
Protetores solares
title_short Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status
title_full Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status
title_fullStr Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status
title_full_unstemmed Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status
title_sort Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status
author Passeron, Thierry
author_facet Passeron, Thierry
Bouillon, Roger A.
Callender, Valerie D.
Cestari, Tania Ferreira
Diepgen, Thomas Ludwig
Green, Adele C.
van der Pols, Jolieke C.
Bernard, Bruno Alain
Ly, Fatoumata
Bernerd, Françoise
Marrot, Laurent
Nielsen, M.
Verschoore, Michèle
Jablonski, Nina G.
Young, Antony R.
author_role author
author2 Bouillon, Roger A.
Callender, Valerie D.
Cestari, Tania Ferreira
Diepgen, Thomas Ludwig
Green, Adele C.
van der Pols, Jolieke C.
Bernard, Bruno Alain
Ly, Fatoumata
Bernerd, Françoise
Marrot, Laurent
Nielsen, M.
Verschoore, Michèle
Jablonski, Nina G.
Young, Antony R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Passeron, Thierry
Bouillon, Roger A.
Callender, Valerie D.
Cestari, Tania Ferreira
Diepgen, Thomas Ludwig
Green, Adele C.
van der Pols, Jolieke C.
Bernard, Bruno Alain
Ly, Fatoumata
Bernerd, Françoise
Marrot, Laurent
Nielsen, M.
Verschoore, Michèle
Jablonski, Nina G.
Young, Antony R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Luz solar
Vitamina D
Protetores solares
topic Luz solar
Vitamina D
Protetores solares
description Background: Global concern about vitamin D deficiency has fuelled debates on photoprotection and the importance of solar exposure to meet vitamin D requirements. Objectives: To review the published evidence to reach a consensus on the influence of photoprotection by sunscreens on vitamin D status, considering other relevant factors. Methods: An international panel of 13 experts in endocrinology, dermatology, photobiology, epidemiology and biological anthropology reviewed the literature prior to a 1-day meeting in June 2017, during which the evidence was discussed. Methods of assessment and determining factors of vitamin D status, and public health perspectives were examined and consequences of sun exposure and the effects of photoprotection were assessed. Results: A serum level of ≥ 50 nmol L−1 25(OH)D is a target for all individuals. Broad-spectrum sunscreens that prevent erythema are unlikely to compromise vitamin D status in healthy populations. Vitamin D screening should be restricted to those at risk of hypovitaminosis, such as patients with photosensitivity disorders, who require rigorous photoprotection. Screening and supplementation are advised for this group. Conclusions: Sunscreen use for daily and recreational photoprotection does not compromise vitamin D synthesis, even when applied under optimal conditions.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-02-10T04:14:33Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217867
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0007-0963
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001120622
identifier_str_mv 0007-0963
001120622
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217867
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv The British journal of dermatology (1951). Oxford. vol. 181, no. 5 (Nov. 2019), p. 916-931
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217867/2/001120622.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217867/1/001120622.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 79797454e52724024c3b865e6cd59a5b
9f9edb78024539ad69308cd4b92c76a8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447731392479232