Shambles on YouTube: an analysis of comments about Brazilian universities budget cuts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kleina, Nilton Cesar Monastier
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Brodbeck, Pedro, Alison, Murilo Brum, Silva, Tiago Philippini Ferreira Borges da, Marioto, Djiovanni Jonas França, Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso, Prudencio, Kelly Cristina de Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Intexto (Porto Alegre)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/111751
Resumo: The article presents a content analysis of the argumentative resources presented in the comments on YouTube videos about the budget cuts of educational institutions made by the Brazilian government in 2019. We collected 6,609 comments in six videos that dealt with the contingency of the discretionary budget of federal universities - a measure announced in May 2019 by the Ministry of Education. Three videos present themselves in favor of the cuts (from the channels MamãeFalei, Nando Moura and Diego Rox), while the other three are against them (the channels Meteoro Brasil, Henry Bugalho and O Historiador). The results evince a low interactivity among the commentators as well as with the video content itself, and a lack in taking a position on the topic. They also reinforce previous studies, showing greater popularity and better performance by conservative channels and revealing a low disagreement in the relationship between the commentator and the video producer.
id UFRGS-6_43126e6093eed38fce6d4984a4b16d9f
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/111751
network_acronym_str UFRGS-6
network_name_str Intexto (Porto Alegre)
repository_id_str
spelling Shambles on YouTube: an analysis of comments about Brazilian universities budget cutsBalbúrdia no YouTube: uma análise de comentários sobre os cortes nas universidades brasileirasConversações onlineDeliberação onlineYouTubeEnsino SuperiorOnline political talkOnline deliberationYouTubeBrazilian universitiesThe article presents a content analysis of the argumentative resources presented in the comments on YouTube videos about the budget cuts of educational institutions made by the Brazilian government in 2019. We collected 6,609 comments in six videos that dealt with the contingency of the discretionary budget of federal universities - a measure announced in May 2019 by the Ministry of Education. Three videos present themselves in favor of the cuts (from the channels MamãeFalei, Nando Moura and Diego Rox), while the other three are against them (the channels Meteoro Brasil, Henry Bugalho and O Historiador). The results evince a low interactivity among the commentators as well as with the video content itself, and a lack in taking a position on the topic. They also reinforce previous studies, showing greater popularity and better performance by conservative channels and revealing a low disagreement in the relationship between the commentator and the video producer.O artigo apresenta uma análise de conteúdo dos recursos argumentativos presentes nos comentários em vídeos do YouTube sobre os cortes na educação feitos pelo governo brasileiro no ano de 2019. Foram coletados 6.609 comentários de seis vídeos que tratam sobre o contingenciamento do orçamento discricionário das universidades federais — medida anunciada em maio de 2019 pelo Ministério da Educação. Três vídeos são a favor dos cortes (dos canais MamãeFalei, Nando Moura e Diego Rox), enquanto outros três foram contra (nos canais Meteoro Brasil, Henry Bugalho e O Historiador). Os resultados apontam para uma interatividade baixa, seja com outros usuários ou com o conteúdo do vídeo, e uma ausência de tomada de posição em relação ao tema. Também reforçam estudos anteriores, indicando maior popularidade e melhor desempenho dos canais conservadores e revelando uma baixa discordância na relação entre comentarista e o produtor do vídeo.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2022-08-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa empíricaapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/11175110.19132/1807-8583202253.111751Intexto; No. 53 (2022); 111751Intexto; Núm. 53 (2022); 111751Intexto; No. 53 (2022); 111751Intexto; N. 53 (2022); 111751Intexto; n. 53 (2022); 1117511807-8583reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/111751/85896Copyright (c) 2022 Nilton Cesar Monastier Kleina, Pedro Brodbeck, Murilo Brum Alison, Tiago Tiago Philippini Ferreira Borges da Silva, Djiovanni Jonas França Marioto, Rafael Cardoso Sampaio, Kelly Cristina de Souza Prudenciohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKleina, Nilton Cesar MonastierBrodbeck, PedroAlison, Murilo BrumSilva, Tiago Philippini Ferreira Borges daMarioto, Djiovanni Jonas FrançaSampaio, Rafael CardosoPrudencio, Kelly Cristina de Souza2023-07-17T18:27:40Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/111751Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intextoONGhttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intexto/oai||intexto@ufrgs.br1807-85831807-8583opendoar:2023-07-17T18:27:40Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Shambles on YouTube: an analysis of comments about Brazilian universities budget cuts
Balbúrdia no YouTube: uma análise de comentários sobre os cortes nas universidades brasileiras
title Shambles on YouTube: an analysis of comments about Brazilian universities budget cuts
spellingShingle Shambles on YouTube: an analysis of comments about Brazilian universities budget cuts
Kleina, Nilton Cesar Monastier
Conversações online
Deliberação online
YouTube
Ensino Superior
Online political talk
Online deliberation
YouTube
Brazilian universities
title_short Shambles on YouTube: an analysis of comments about Brazilian universities budget cuts
title_full Shambles on YouTube: an analysis of comments about Brazilian universities budget cuts
title_fullStr Shambles on YouTube: an analysis of comments about Brazilian universities budget cuts
title_full_unstemmed Shambles on YouTube: an analysis of comments about Brazilian universities budget cuts
title_sort Shambles on YouTube: an analysis of comments about Brazilian universities budget cuts
author Kleina, Nilton Cesar Monastier
author_facet Kleina, Nilton Cesar Monastier
Brodbeck, Pedro
Alison, Murilo Brum
Silva, Tiago Philippini Ferreira Borges da
Marioto, Djiovanni Jonas França
Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso
Prudencio, Kelly Cristina de Souza
author_role author
author2 Brodbeck, Pedro
Alison, Murilo Brum
Silva, Tiago Philippini Ferreira Borges da
Marioto, Djiovanni Jonas França
Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso
Prudencio, Kelly Cristina de Souza
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kleina, Nilton Cesar Monastier
Brodbeck, Pedro
Alison, Murilo Brum
Silva, Tiago Philippini Ferreira Borges da
Marioto, Djiovanni Jonas França
Sampaio, Rafael Cardoso
Prudencio, Kelly Cristina de Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conversações online
Deliberação online
YouTube
Ensino Superior
Online political talk
Online deliberation
YouTube
Brazilian universities
topic Conversações online
Deliberação online
YouTube
Ensino Superior
Online political talk
Online deliberation
YouTube
Brazilian universities
description The article presents a content analysis of the argumentative resources presented in the comments on YouTube videos about the budget cuts of educational institutions made by the Brazilian government in 2019. We collected 6,609 comments in six videos that dealt with the contingency of the discretionary budget of federal universities - a measure announced in May 2019 by the Ministry of Education. Three videos present themselves in favor of the cuts (from the channels MamãeFalei, Nando Moura and Diego Rox), while the other three are against them (the channels Meteoro Brasil, Henry Bugalho and O Historiador). The results evince a low interactivity among the commentators as well as with the video content itself, and a lack in taking a position on the topic. They also reinforce previous studies, showing greater popularity and better performance by conservative channels and revealing a low disagreement in the relationship between the commentator and the video producer.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa empírica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/111751
10.19132/1807-8583202253.111751
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/111751
identifier_str_mv 10.19132/1807-8583202253.111751
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/111751/85896
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Intexto; No. 53 (2022); 111751
Intexto; Núm. 53 (2022); 111751
Intexto; No. 53 (2022); 111751
Intexto; N. 53 (2022); 111751
Intexto; n. 53 (2022); 111751
1807-8583
reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Intexto (Porto Alegre)
collection Intexto (Porto Alegre)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||intexto@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1789438580413693952

Registros relacionados