FIELDS, WORLDS AND FIGURATIONS: USING ELIAS TO REVISIT DEPTH CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY AND EMANCIPATORY CRITIQUE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hughes,Jason
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Saramago,André, Dunning,Michael, Hughes,Kahryn
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Sociologia & Antropologia
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752022000100053
Resumo: Abstract We centrally explore the significance of conceptual imagery, particularly ideas of ‘depth’ and its relationship to ideals of critique, emancipatory action, and conceptions of social structure and action. We consider how depth imagery is invoked in critiques of sociological thinkers understood to employ ‘flat’ social ontologies. We develop a three-way comparison between Pierre Bourdieu’s ‘field,’ Howard Becker’s ‘world,’ and Norbert Elias’s ‘figuration’ to argue that not only is the ‘flatness’ charge unwarranted in the case of Becker’s and Elias’s ontologies, but the axioms upon which it is made are static, substantialist, and reductively mechanistic. Drawing on the work of Elias, we consider the merits of alternative more dynamically oriented conceptual imagery, reflecting upon its implications for how we might revisit the ‘politics’ of figurational sociology and understandings of emancipatory critique more generally.
id UFRJ-18_973a99c4a7b670b6c2c2ff17210c0b4e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2238-38752022000100053
network_acronym_str UFRJ-18
network_name_str Sociologia & Antropologia
repository_id_str
spelling FIELDS, WORLDS AND FIGURATIONS: USING ELIAS TO REVISIT DEPTH CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY AND EMANCIPATORY CRITIQUEconceptual imagerydepthfigurational sociologyemancipatory critiqueAbstract We centrally explore the significance of conceptual imagery, particularly ideas of ‘depth’ and its relationship to ideals of critique, emancipatory action, and conceptions of social structure and action. We consider how depth imagery is invoked in critiques of sociological thinkers understood to employ ‘flat’ social ontologies. We develop a three-way comparison between Pierre Bourdieu’s ‘field,’ Howard Becker’s ‘world,’ and Norbert Elias’s ‘figuration’ to argue that not only is the ‘flatness’ charge unwarranted in the case of Becker’s and Elias’s ontologies, but the axioms upon which it is made are static, substantialist, and reductively mechanistic. Drawing on the work of Elias, we consider the merits of alternative more dynamically oriented conceptual imagery, reflecting upon its implications for how we might revisit the ‘politics’ of figurational sociology and understandings of emancipatory critique more generally.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro2022-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752022000100053Sociologia & Antropologia v.12 n.1 2022reponame:Sociologia & Antropologiainstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2238-38752022v1212info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHughes,JasonSaramago,AndréDunning,MichaelHughes,Kahryneng2022-06-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2238-38752022000100053Revistahttp://www.revistappgsa.ifcs.ufrj.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistappgsa@gmail.com2238-38752236-7527opendoar:2022-06-01T00:00Sociologia & Antropologia - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv FIELDS, WORLDS AND FIGURATIONS: USING ELIAS TO REVISIT DEPTH CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY AND EMANCIPATORY CRITIQUE
title FIELDS, WORLDS AND FIGURATIONS: USING ELIAS TO REVISIT DEPTH CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY AND EMANCIPATORY CRITIQUE
spellingShingle FIELDS, WORLDS AND FIGURATIONS: USING ELIAS TO REVISIT DEPTH CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY AND EMANCIPATORY CRITIQUE
Hughes,Jason
conceptual imagery
depth
figurational sociology
emancipatory critique
title_short FIELDS, WORLDS AND FIGURATIONS: USING ELIAS TO REVISIT DEPTH CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY AND EMANCIPATORY CRITIQUE
title_full FIELDS, WORLDS AND FIGURATIONS: USING ELIAS TO REVISIT DEPTH CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY AND EMANCIPATORY CRITIQUE
title_fullStr FIELDS, WORLDS AND FIGURATIONS: USING ELIAS TO REVISIT DEPTH CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY AND EMANCIPATORY CRITIQUE
title_full_unstemmed FIELDS, WORLDS AND FIGURATIONS: USING ELIAS TO REVISIT DEPTH CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY AND EMANCIPATORY CRITIQUE
title_sort FIELDS, WORLDS AND FIGURATIONS: USING ELIAS TO REVISIT DEPTH CONCEPTUAL IMAGERY AND EMANCIPATORY CRITIQUE
author Hughes,Jason
author_facet Hughes,Jason
Saramago,André
Dunning,Michael
Hughes,Kahryn
author_role author
author2 Saramago,André
Dunning,Michael
Hughes,Kahryn
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hughes,Jason
Saramago,André
Dunning,Michael
Hughes,Kahryn
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv conceptual imagery
depth
figurational sociology
emancipatory critique
topic conceptual imagery
depth
figurational sociology
emancipatory critique
description Abstract We centrally explore the significance of conceptual imagery, particularly ideas of ‘depth’ and its relationship to ideals of critique, emancipatory action, and conceptions of social structure and action. We consider how depth imagery is invoked in critiques of sociological thinkers understood to employ ‘flat’ social ontologies. We develop a three-way comparison between Pierre Bourdieu’s ‘field,’ Howard Becker’s ‘world,’ and Norbert Elias’s ‘figuration’ to argue that not only is the ‘flatness’ charge unwarranted in the case of Becker’s and Elias’s ontologies, but the axioms upon which it is made are static, substantialist, and reductively mechanistic. Drawing on the work of Elias, we consider the merits of alternative more dynamically oriented conceptual imagery, reflecting upon its implications for how we might revisit the ‘politics’ of figurational sociology and understandings of emancipatory critique more generally.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752022000100053
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752022000100053
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2238-38752022v1212
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociologia & Antropologia v.12 n.1 2022
reponame:Sociologia & Antropologia
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Sociologia & Antropologia
collection Sociologia & Antropologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociologia & Antropologia - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistappgsa@gmail.com
_version_ 1754734733570342912