Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural Targets

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Gustavo Ferreira de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Gutierrez, Lorena Avelina Rojas, Barbassa, Ademir Paceli, Pereira, Luciana Escalante, Cândido, Anny Keli Aparecida Alves, Marcato Júnior, José, Oliveira, José Renato Silva de, Paranhos Filho, Antonio Conceição
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/7858
Resumo: The particularities of the remote sensing instruments, even when they have the same characteristics, made the images generated, different among themselves. With that in mind, the goals of this work were to analyze the applicability and the limits of detection in the identification of natural targets in different satellite images. The area of study is located in Onda Verde in the state of São Paulo. The natural targets were selected from the analyses taken of the images and in the field trip. The images chosen presented the best contrast with the surroundings and easy to locate in the satellite images. For the digital processing of them the free software gvSIG was used. In this study, data of the mean spatial resolution satellite images were used such as Landsat-5, CBERS-2B e IRS-P6, available in the public domain database of the INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais) and images of high spatial resolution of the satellites RapidEye and WorldView-2. In the mean spatial resolution sensors, the smallest spatial resolutions of the TM and LISS-3 sensors didn't interfered the visualization of the spectral targets analyzed, since the CCD have the higher spatial resolution, it wasn't possible the identification of the selected targets. The high spatial resolution images RapidEye and WorldView-2 showed great levels of details for the land cover, hence the high radiometric resolution of these satellites.
id UFRJ-21_27d8584b396d39a4ff64d568d434e858
oai_identifier_str oai:www.revistas.ufrj.br:article/7858
network_acronym_str UFRJ-21
network_name_str Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural TargetsUso de Diferentes Sensores de Satélite na Discriminação de Alvos NaturaisOnda Verde city; Remote sensing; Geothecnologies; Orbital imagesOnda Verde; Sensoriamento remoto; Geotecnologias; Imagens orbitaisThe particularities of the remote sensing instruments, even when they have the same characteristics, made the images generated, different among themselves. With that in mind, the goals of this work were to analyze the applicability and the limits of detection in the identification of natural targets in different satellite images. The area of study is located in Onda Verde in the state of São Paulo. The natural targets were selected from the analyses taken of the images and in the field trip. The images chosen presented the best contrast with the surroundings and easy to locate in the satellite images. For the digital processing of them the free software gvSIG was used. In this study, data of the mean spatial resolution satellite images were used such as Landsat-5, CBERS-2B e IRS-P6, available in the public domain database of the INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais) and images of high spatial resolution of the satellites RapidEye and WorldView-2. In the mean spatial resolution sensors, the smallest spatial resolutions of the TM and LISS-3 sensors didn't interfered the visualization of the spectral targets analyzed, since the CCD have the higher spatial resolution, it wasn't possible the identification of the selected targets. The high spatial resolution images RapidEye and WorldView-2 showed great levels of details for the land cover, hence the high radiometric resolution of these satellites.As particularidades nos instrumentos de sensoriamento remoto, mesmo quando possuem características semelhantes, torna as imagens geradas por estes, diferentes entre si. Visando isto, o objetivo do trabalho foi analisar a aplicabilidade e os limites de detecção na identificação de alvos naturais em diferentes imagens de satélites. A área de estudo está localizada no Estado de São Paulo dentro do Município de Onda Verde, os alvos naturais foram selecionados a partir de análises realizadas nas imagens e visita desses pontos em campo. Foram escolhidas áreas que apresentaram bom contraste com o entorno e fácil localização nas imagens de satélite. Para o processamento digital de imagem foi utilizado o software livre gvSIG. Neste estudo foram empregados dados de satélites de média resolução espacial como Landsat-5, CBERS-2B e IRS-P6, disponíveis na base de dados de domínio público do INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais) e imagens de alta resolução espacial dos satélites RapidEye e WorldView-2. Nos sensores de média resolução espacial, as menores resoluções espaciais dos sensores TM e LISS-3, não impediram a visualização dos alvos espectrais analisados, visto que, no CCD que possui uma maior resolução espacial, não foi possível a identificação dos alvos escolhidos. As imagens de alta resolução espacial RapidEye e WorldView apresentaram grande riqueza de detalhamento para a cobertura do solo, a isto atrela-se a alta resolução radiométrica desses satélites.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro2017-02-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/785810.11137/2016_1_13_22Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; Vol 39, No 1 (2016); 13-22Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; Vol 39, No 1 (2016); 13-221982-39080101-9759reponame:Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJporhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/7858/6339Copyright (c) 2016 Anuário do Instituto de Geociênciashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Gustavo Ferreira deGutierrez, Lorena Avelina RojasBarbassa, Ademir PaceliPereira, Luciana EscalanteCândido, Anny Keli Aparecida AlvesMarcato Júnior, JoséOliveira, José Renato Silva deParanhos Filho, Antonio Conceição2017-02-15T18:21:34Zoai:www.revistas.ufrj.br:article/7858Revistahttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/oaianuario@igeo.ufrj.br||1982-39080101-9759opendoar:2017-02-15T18:21:34Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural Targets
Uso de Diferentes Sensores de Satélite na Discriminação de Alvos Naturais
title Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural Targets
spellingShingle Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural Targets
Souza, Gustavo Ferreira de
Onda Verde city; Remote sensing; Geothecnologies; Orbital images
Onda Verde; Sensoriamento remoto; Geotecnologias; Imagens orbitais
title_short Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural Targets
title_full Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural Targets
title_fullStr Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural Targets
title_full_unstemmed Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural Targets
title_sort Use of Different Satellite Sensors on Discrimination of Natural Targets
author Souza, Gustavo Ferreira de
author_facet Souza, Gustavo Ferreira de
Gutierrez, Lorena Avelina Rojas
Barbassa, Ademir Paceli
Pereira, Luciana Escalante
Cândido, Anny Keli Aparecida Alves
Marcato Júnior, José
Oliveira, José Renato Silva de
Paranhos Filho, Antonio Conceição
author_role author
author2 Gutierrez, Lorena Avelina Rojas
Barbassa, Ademir Paceli
Pereira, Luciana Escalante
Cândido, Anny Keli Aparecida Alves
Marcato Júnior, José
Oliveira, José Renato Silva de
Paranhos Filho, Antonio Conceição
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Gustavo Ferreira de
Gutierrez, Lorena Avelina Rojas
Barbassa, Ademir Paceli
Pereira, Luciana Escalante
Cândido, Anny Keli Aparecida Alves
Marcato Júnior, José
Oliveira, José Renato Silva de
Paranhos Filho, Antonio Conceição
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Onda Verde city; Remote sensing; Geothecnologies; Orbital images
Onda Verde; Sensoriamento remoto; Geotecnologias; Imagens orbitais
topic Onda Verde city; Remote sensing; Geothecnologies; Orbital images
Onda Verde; Sensoriamento remoto; Geotecnologias; Imagens orbitais
description The particularities of the remote sensing instruments, even when they have the same characteristics, made the images generated, different among themselves. With that in mind, the goals of this work were to analyze the applicability and the limits of detection in the identification of natural targets in different satellite images. The area of study is located in Onda Verde in the state of São Paulo. The natural targets were selected from the analyses taken of the images and in the field trip. The images chosen presented the best contrast with the surroundings and easy to locate in the satellite images. For the digital processing of them the free software gvSIG was used. In this study, data of the mean spatial resolution satellite images were used such as Landsat-5, CBERS-2B e IRS-P6, available in the public domain database of the INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais) and images of high spatial resolution of the satellites RapidEye and WorldView-2. In the mean spatial resolution sensors, the smallest spatial resolutions of the TM and LISS-3 sensors didn't interfered the visualization of the spectral targets analyzed, since the CCD have the higher spatial resolution, it wasn't possible the identification of the selected targets. The high spatial resolution images RapidEye and WorldView-2 showed great levels of details for the land cover, hence the high radiometric resolution of these satellites.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/7858
10.11137/2016_1_13_22
url https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/7858
identifier_str_mv 10.11137/2016_1_13_22
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/7858/6339
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Anuário do Instituto de Geociências
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Anuário do Instituto de Geociências
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; Vol 39, No 1 (2016); 13-22
Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; Vol 39, No 1 (2016); 13-22
1982-3908
0101-9759
reponame:Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
collection Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv anuario@igeo.ufrj.br||
_version_ 1797053539639361536