TENSIONS BETWEEN THEORY AND HISTORY IN VON MISES'S CRITIQUE OF SOCIALISM
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/19878 |
Resumo: | The article investigates the relation between praxeology and history in the critique Mises directs at the possibility of the long-term existence of a socialist commonwealth. We argue that Mises makes no clear distinction between the praxeological concept of 'private property' (associated with the possession of means of production) and the historical concept of the ideal-type 'private property' (associated to property rights -- see HODGSON, 2015). The lack of precision between the theoretical and the historical concepts of private property prevents Mises's critique from being an 'exact law', as he would have it. Finally, we show in the last section the consequences for Mises's critique of socialism of having a historical and a praxeological concept of private property. |
id |
UFRJ-2_34f5b083890806e09b4aa4be1df3671c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19878 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRJ-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Economia Contemporânea |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
TENSIONS BETWEEN THEORY AND HISTORY IN VON MISES'S CRITIQUE OF SOCIALISMBoff, EmmanoelMisessocialismsocialist calculationcritiqueB13B14B15The article investigates the relation between praxeology and history in the critique Mises directs at the possibility of the long-term existence of a socialist commonwealth. We argue that Mises makes no clear distinction between the praxeological concept of 'private property' (associated with the possession of means of production) and the historical concept of the ideal-type 'private property' (associated to property rights -- see HODGSON, 2015). The lack of precision between the theoretical and the historical concepts of private property prevents Mises's critique from being an 'exact law', as he would have it. Finally, we show in the last section the consequences for Mises's critique of socialism of having a historical and a praxeological concept of private property. IE-UFRJ2018-08-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/19878Revista de Economia Contemporânea; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 22, n. 2, mai./ago. 2018Journal of Contemporary Economics; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 22, n. 2, mai./ago. 20181980-5527porhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/19878/11519Copyright (c) 2018 Emmanoel Boffoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/198782019-04-15T19:32:37Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
TENSIONS BETWEEN THEORY AND HISTORY IN VON MISES'S CRITIQUE OF SOCIALISM |
title |
TENSIONS BETWEEN THEORY AND HISTORY IN VON MISES'S CRITIQUE OF SOCIALISM |
spellingShingle |
TENSIONS BETWEEN THEORY AND HISTORY IN VON MISES'S CRITIQUE OF SOCIALISM Boff, Emmanoel Mises socialism socialist calculation critique B13 B14 B15 |
title_short |
TENSIONS BETWEEN THEORY AND HISTORY IN VON MISES'S CRITIQUE OF SOCIALISM |
title_full |
TENSIONS BETWEEN THEORY AND HISTORY IN VON MISES'S CRITIQUE OF SOCIALISM |
title_fullStr |
TENSIONS BETWEEN THEORY AND HISTORY IN VON MISES'S CRITIQUE OF SOCIALISM |
title_full_unstemmed |
TENSIONS BETWEEN THEORY AND HISTORY IN VON MISES'S CRITIQUE OF SOCIALISM |
title_sort |
TENSIONS BETWEEN THEORY AND HISTORY IN VON MISES'S CRITIQUE OF SOCIALISM |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Boff, Emmanoel |
author |
Boff, Emmanoel |
author_facet |
Boff, Emmanoel |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Mises socialism socialist calculation critique B13 B14 B15 |
topic |
Mises socialism socialist calculation critique B13 B14 B15 |
description |
The article investigates the relation between praxeology and history in the critique Mises directs at the possibility of the long-term existence of a socialist commonwealth. We argue that Mises makes no clear distinction between the praxeological concept of 'private property' (associated with the possession of means of production) and the historical concept of the ideal-type 'private property' (associated to property rights -- see HODGSON, 2015). The lack of precision between the theoretical and the historical concepts of private property prevents Mises's critique from being an 'exact law', as he would have it. Finally, we show in the last section the consequences for Mises's critique of socialism of having a historical and a praxeological concept of private property. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-28 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/19878 |
url |
https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/19878 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/19878/11519 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Emmanoel Boff |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Emmanoel Boff |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IE-UFRJ |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IE-UFRJ |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Economia Contemporânea; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 22, n. 2, mai./ago. 2018 Journal of Contemporary Economics; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 22, n. 2, mai./ago. 2018 1980-5527 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1789436682018226176 |