Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of Soils

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Heemann,Tagliane Puhl
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Arantes,Sayonara, Andrade,Ednaldo, Viana,Daniela, Sella,Heitor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Floresta e Ambiente
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000300111
Resumo: Abstract The present study aimed to evaluate the potential of forest species for herbicide phytoremediation. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse with a randomized block design and a 2x3x3 factorial scheme, using two soils (Red-Yellow Latosol - RYL and Quartzarenic sandy soil - QN), three herbicide solutions (without herbicides/water, 2,4-D and atrazine), and three forest species (Cecropia hololeuca, Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla and Hymenea coubaril), with four replications. After the experiment, Cucumis sativus was cultivated in order to investigate possible herbicide residues in the soils. The evaluated forest species reduced atrazine and 2,4-D residues in most treatments, except for the Jatobá (Hymenaea coubaril ) cultivated in the RYL soil. Eucalyptus was the species that showed the greatest tolerance to herbicide action, demonstrating the potential for phytoremediation of atrazine and 2,4-D. Cecropia hololeuca and Hymenaea coubaril presented the greatest potential for 2,4-D and atrazine, respectively.
id UFRJ-3_2097507463b15ad7b9bd80c07cd85611
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2179-80872018000300111
network_acronym_str UFRJ-3
network_name_str Floresta e Ambiente
repository_id_str
spelling Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of SoilsleachingeucalyptusJatobáEmbaubaAbstract The present study aimed to evaluate the potential of forest species for herbicide phytoremediation. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse with a randomized block design and a 2x3x3 factorial scheme, using two soils (Red-Yellow Latosol - RYL and Quartzarenic sandy soil - QN), three herbicide solutions (without herbicides/water, 2,4-D and atrazine), and three forest species (Cecropia hololeuca, Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla and Hymenea coubaril), with four replications. After the experiment, Cucumis sativus was cultivated in order to investigate possible herbicide residues in the soils. The evaluated forest species reduced atrazine and 2,4-D residues in most treatments, except for the Jatobá (Hymenaea coubaril ) cultivated in the RYL soil. Eucalyptus was the species that showed the greatest tolerance to herbicide action, demonstrating the potential for phytoremediation of atrazine and 2,4-D. Cecropia hololeuca and Hymenaea coubaril presented the greatest potential for 2,4-D and atrazine, respectively.Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000300111Floresta e Ambiente v.25 n.3 2018reponame:Floresta e Ambienteinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2179-8087.046517info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHeemann,Tagliane PuhlArantes,SayonaraAndrade,EdnaldoViana,DanielaSella,Heitoreng2018-06-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-80872018000300111Revistahttps://www.floram.org/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpfloramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br||2179-80871415-0980opendoar:2018-06-11T00:00Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of Soils
title Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of Soils
spellingShingle Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of Soils
Heemann,Tagliane Puhl
leaching
eucalyptus
Jatobá
Embauba
title_short Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of Soils
title_full Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of Soils
title_fullStr Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of Soils
title_full_unstemmed Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of Soils
title_sort Phytoremediation Capacity of Forest Species to Herbicides in Two Types of Soils
author Heemann,Tagliane Puhl
author_facet Heemann,Tagliane Puhl
Arantes,Sayonara
Andrade,Ednaldo
Viana,Daniela
Sella,Heitor
author_role author
author2 Arantes,Sayonara
Andrade,Ednaldo
Viana,Daniela
Sella,Heitor
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Heemann,Tagliane Puhl
Arantes,Sayonara
Andrade,Ednaldo
Viana,Daniela
Sella,Heitor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv leaching
eucalyptus
Jatobá
Embauba
topic leaching
eucalyptus
Jatobá
Embauba
description Abstract The present study aimed to evaluate the potential of forest species for herbicide phytoremediation. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse with a randomized block design and a 2x3x3 factorial scheme, using two soils (Red-Yellow Latosol - RYL and Quartzarenic sandy soil - QN), three herbicide solutions (without herbicides/water, 2,4-D and atrazine), and three forest species (Cecropia hololeuca, Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus urophylla and Hymenea coubaril), with four replications. After the experiment, Cucumis sativus was cultivated in order to investigate possible herbicide residues in the soils. The evaluated forest species reduced atrazine and 2,4-D residues in most treatments, except for the Jatobá (Hymenaea coubaril ) cultivated in the RYL soil. Eucalyptus was the species that showed the greatest tolerance to herbicide action, demonstrating the potential for phytoremediation of atrazine and 2,4-D. Cecropia hololeuca and Hymenaea coubaril presented the greatest potential for 2,4-D and atrazine, respectively.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000300111
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000300111
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2179-8087.046517
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Floresta e Ambiente v.25 n.3 2018
reponame:Floresta e Ambiente
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Floresta e Ambiente
collection Floresta e Ambiente
repository.name.fl_str_mv Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv floramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br||
_version_ 1750128142092075008