Exondontias success index performed with minimally traumatic extractor
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Ciência Plural |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/rcp/article/view/22516 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Techniques for tooth extraction have been improved aiming at a procedure that reduces professional effort, surgical time, pain and inflammatory processes. In this sense, minimally traumatic extractors with vertical extraction, propose to preserve the alveolar bone and provide a faster and more comfortable recovery for the patient. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Maximus® Minimally Traumatic Extraction Kit (Contagem / MG- Brazil) in the extraction of uniradicular residual roots from incisors, canines and premolars. Methodology: This is a clinical, prospective and analytical trial. Patients were operated on using the device, and demographic data, surgical time, pain and comfort after surgery were evaluated, as well as the degree of professional satisfaction with the use of the device. To verify significant differences, the Mann-Whitney test was used and the search for associations was performed with Fisher's exact test. For all tests, significance was set at p <0.05. Results: Forty elements were removed, surgical time averaged 16.28 minutes, levels of pain and comfort immediately after surgery remained low (p <0.0001), and the degree of job satisfaction remained high (p < 0.0001). The success rate of the device was 93.3% for the incisor elements and 20% for the canine and premolar elements (p <0.0001). Conclusions: The effectiveness of the extractor is determined by the size of the root surface covered with periodontal fibers and the location of the tooth. However, can be well indicated in planning implanted rehabilitation in the anterior region of the maxilla and mandible. Keywords: Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Alveolar Process; Tissue Preservation; Tooth Extraction. |
id |
UFRN-4_db382288176dbf4fb3c427eed38b1f47 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/22516 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Ciência Plural |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Exondontias success index performed with minimally traumatic extractorÍndice de éxito de exondonties realizado con extractor traumático mínimoÍNDICE DE SUCESSO DE EXODONTIAS REALIZADAS COM EXTRATOR MINIMAMENTE TRAUMÁTICOIntroduction: Techniques for tooth extraction have been improved aiming at a procedure that reduces professional effort, surgical time, pain and inflammatory processes. In this sense, minimally traumatic extractors with vertical extraction, propose to preserve the alveolar bone and provide a faster and more comfortable recovery for the patient. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Maximus® Minimally Traumatic Extraction Kit (Contagem / MG- Brazil) in the extraction of uniradicular residual roots from incisors, canines and premolars. Methodology: This is a clinical, prospective and analytical trial. Patients were operated on using the device, and demographic data, surgical time, pain and comfort after surgery were evaluated, as well as the degree of professional satisfaction with the use of the device. To verify significant differences, the Mann-Whitney test was used and the search for associations was performed with Fisher's exact test. For all tests, significance was set at p <0.05. Results: Forty elements were removed, surgical time averaged 16.28 minutes, levels of pain and comfort immediately after surgery remained low (p <0.0001), and the degree of job satisfaction remained high (p < 0.0001). The success rate of the device was 93.3% for the incisor elements and 20% for the canine and premolar elements (p <0.0001). Conclusions: The effectiveness of the extractor is determined by the size of the root surface covered with periodontal fibers and the location of the tooth. However, can be well indicated in planning implanted rehabilitation in the anterior region of the maxilla and mandible. Keywords: Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Alveolar Process; Tissue Preservation; Tooth Extraction.Introducción: se han mejorado las técnicas de extracción con el objetivo de un procedimiento que reduzca el esfuerzo profesional, el tiempo quirúrgico, el dolor y los procesos inflamatorios. En este sentido, los extractores mínimamente traumáticos con extracción vertical tienen como objetivo preservar el hueso alveolar y proporcionar una recuperación más rápida y cómoda para el paciente. Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad del Kit de Extracción Mínimamente Traumática Maximus® (Contagem / MG-Brasil) en la extracción de raíces residuales de incisivos, caninos y premolares uniradiculares. Metodología: Es un ensayo clínico, prospectivo y analítico. Los pacientes fueron intervenidos con el dispositivo y se evaluaron datos demográficos, tiempo quirúrgico, dolor y comodidad después de la cirugía, así como el grado de satisfacción laboral con el uso del dispositivo. Para verificar diferencias significativas se utilizó la prueba de Mann-Whitney y la búsqueda de asociaciones se realizó mediante la prueba exacta de Fisher. Para todas las pruebas, la significancia se estableció en p <0,05. Resultados: Se retiraron cuarenta ítems, el tiempo quirúrgico promedió 16.28 minutos, los niveles de dolor y comodidad inmediatamente después de la cirugía permanecieron bajos (p <0.0001) y el grado de satisfacción laboral se mantuvo alto (p <0,0001). La tasa de éxito del dispositivo fue del 93,3% para los elementos incisivos y del 20% para los elementos caninos y premolares (p <0,0001). Conclusiones: La efectividad del extractor está determinada por el tamaño de la superficie radicular cubierta por fibras periodontales y la ubicación del diente. Sin embargo, puede resultar muy adecuado para planificar la rehabilitación con implantes en la región anterior del maxilar y la mandíbula. Palabras clave: Procedimientos quirúrgicos mínimamente invasivos; Proceso alveolar; Preservación de tejidos; Extracción dental.Introdução: Técnicas para extração dentária vêm sendo aperfeiçoadas objetivando um procedimento que diminua o esforço profissional, o tempo cirúrgico, amenize as dores e os processos inflamatórios. Neste sentido os extratores minimamente traumáticos com a exodontia vertical, propõem-se a preservar o osso alveolar e proporcionar uma recuperação mais rápida e confortável para o paciente. Objetivo: Avaliar a efetividade do Kit para Extração Minimamente traumática da Maximus® (Contagem/MG- Brasil) na exodontia de raízes residuais de incisivos, caninos e pré-molares unirradiculares. Metodologia: Trata-se de um ensaio clínico, prospectivo e analítico. Os pacientes foram operados utilizando o dispositivo, sendo avaliados os dados demográficos, tempo cirúrgico, dor e conforto após a cirurgia, bem como o grau de satisfação profissional com o uso do dispositivo. Para verificar diferenças significativas foi utilizado o teste de Mann-Whitney e a busca de associações foi realizada com o Exato de Fisher. Para todos os testes foi estabelecida uma significância com p<0,05. Resultados: Quarenta elementos foram removidos, o tempo cirúrgico foi em média 16,28 minutos, níveis de dor e conforto imediatamente após a cirurgia se mantiveram baixos (p<0,0001), e o grau de satisfação profissional se manteve alto (p<0,0001). A taxa de sucesso do dispositivo foi de 93,3% para os elementos incisivos e 20% para os elementos caninos e pré-molares (p<0,0001). Conclusões: A eficácia do extrator é determinada pelo tamanho da superfície radicular cobertas com fibras periodontais e a localização do dente. No entanto pode ser bem indicada no planejamento de reabilitações implantosuportadas em região anterior de maxila e mandíbula. Palavras-Chave: Procedimentos cirúrgicos minimamente invasivos; Processo alveolar; Preservação de tecidos; Extração de dente.Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN2021-01-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/rcp/article/view/2251610.21680/2446-7286.2021v7n1ID22516Revista Ciência Plural; v. 7 n. 1 (2021): Revista Ciência Plural; 14-292446-728610.21680/2446-7286.2021v7n1reponame:Revista Ciência Pluralinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/rcp/article/view/22516/13717Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Ciência Pluralinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMayara Rodrigues Xavier, Cinthia Freitas de Souza Junior, ErasmoDantas Ribeiro, Adyelle Azevedo Silva, Janielma Euler de Souza Lucena, Eudes Henrrique Araújo de Morais, Hécio 2021-06-23T11:43:14Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/22516Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/rcpPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/rcp/oai||irisdoceu.ufrn@gmail.com2446-72862446-7286opendoar:2021-06-23T11:43:14Revista Ciência Plural - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Exondontias success index performed with minimally traumatic extractor Índice de éxito de exondonties realizado con extractor traumático mínimo ÍNDICE DE SUCESSO DE EXODONTIAS REALIZADAS COM EXTRATOR MINIMAMENTE TRAUMÁTICO |
title |
Exondontias success index performed with minimally traumatic extractor |
spellingShingle |
Exondontias success index performed with minimally traumatic extractor Mayara Rodrigues Xavier, Cinthia |
title_short |
Exondontias success index performed with minimally traumatic extractor |
title_full |
Exondontias success index performed with minimally traumatic extractor |
title_fullStr |
Exondontias success index performed with minimally traumatic extractor |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exondontias success index performed with minimally traumatic extractor |
title_sort |
Exondontias success index performed with minimally traumatic extractor |
author |
Mayara Rodrigues Xavier, Cinthia |
author_facet |
Mayara Rodrigues Xavier, Cinthia Freitas de Souza Junior, Erasmo Dantas Ribeiro, Adyelle Azevedo Silva, Janielma Euler de Souza Lucena, Eudes Henrrique Araújo de Morais, Hécio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freitas de Souza Junior, Erasmo Dantas Ribeiro, Adyelle Azevedo Silva, Janielma Euler de Souza Lucena, Eudes Henrrique Araújo de Morais, Hécio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mayara Rodrigues Xavier, Cinthia Freitas de Souza Junior, Erasmo Dantas Ribeiro, Adyelle Azevedo Silva, Janielma Euler de Souza Lucena, Eudes Henrrique Araújo de Morais, Hécio |
description |
Introduction: Techniques for tooth extraction have been improved aiming at a procedure that reduces professional effort, surgical time, pain and inflammatory processes. In this sense, minimally traumatic extractors with vertical extraction, propose to preserve the alveolar bone and provide a faster and more comfortable recovery for the patient. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Maximus® Minimally Traumatic Extraction Kit (Contagem / MG- Brazil) in the extraction of uniradicular residual roots from incisors, canines and premolars. Methodology: This is a clinical, prospective and analytical trial. Patients were operated on using the device, and demographic data, surgical time, pain and comfort after surgery were evaluated, as well as the degree of professional satisfaction with the use of the device. To verify significant differences, the Mann-Whitney test was used and the search for associations was performed with Fisher's exact test. For all tests, significance was set at p <0.05. Results: Forty elements were removed, surgical time averaged 16.28 minutes, levels of pain and comfort immediately after surgery remained low (p <0.0001), and the degree of job satisfaction remained high (p < 0.0001). The success rate of the device was 93.3% for the incisor elements and 20% for the canine and premolar elements (p <0.0001). Conclusions: The effectiveness of the extractor is determined by the size of the root surface covered with periodontal fibers and the location of the tooth. However, can be well indicated in planning implanted rehabilitation in the anterior region of the maxilla and mandible. Keywords: Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Alveolar Process; Tissue Preservation; Tooth Extraction. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/rcp/article/view/22516 10.21680/2446-7286.2021v7n1ID22516 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/rcp/article/view/22516 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21680/2446-7286.2021v7n1ID22516 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/rcp/article/view/22516/13717 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Ciência Plural info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Ciência Plural |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ciência Plural; v. 7 n. 1 (2021): Revista Ciência Plural; 14-29 2446-7286 10.21680/2446-7286.2021v7n1 reponame:Revista Ciência Plural instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Revista Ciência Plural |
collection |
Revista Ciência Plural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ciência Plural - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||irisdoceu.ufrn@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1809455198698995712 |