RECASTING THE NATURALISM–NORMATIVITY DEBATE: NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, NEUROETHICS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Princípios (Natal. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7510 |
Resumo: | Assuming that there is a "neuroscientific turn" in moral philosophy, I will be discussing in this paper how neurophilosophy could shed light on the normative problems raised by a naturalistic project of ethical and social research, particularly related to the question of the articulation between the biological evolution of human species and the social and historical evolution of society and social groups. Taking a critical approach to naturalism and normative theories, I argue that there is a neurophenomenological deficit in naturalism (particularly in the versions of naturalism that follow the program of a naturalized epistemology) and in the normative theories (particularly in the critical theory) and I put forward a version of social constructivism that combines the neuroscientific and neurophilosophical models of Antonio Damasio and Jesse Prinz. |
id |
UFRN-5_cd13685a9db491248147eed0f6934e7d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/7510 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-5 |
network_name_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
RECASTING THE NATURALISM–NORMATIVITY DEBATE: NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, NEUROETHICSNeurophilosophyNeuroscienceNaturalismNormativetyNeuroethicsAssuming that there is a "neuroscientific turn" in moral philosophy, I will be discussing in this paper how neurophilosophy could shed light on the normative problems raised by a naturalistic project of ethical and social research, particularly related to the question of the articulation between the biological evolution of human species and the social and historical evolution of society and social groups. Taking a critical approach to naturalism and normative theories, I argue that there is a neurophenomenological deficit in naturalism (particularly in the versions of naturalism that follow the program of a naturalized epistemology) and in the normative theories (particularly in the critical theory) and I put forward a version of social constructivism that combines the neuroscientific and neurophilosophical models of Antonio Damasio and Jesse Prinz.EDUFRN2015-07-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7510Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 20 n. 33 (2013): Princípios: revista de filosofia; 79-1031983-21090104-8694reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNenghttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7510/5581Copyright (c) 2013 Nythamar de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Nythamar de2016-12-16T17:05:02Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/7510Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2016-12-16T17:05:02Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
RECASTING THE NATURALISM–NORMATIVITY DEBATE: NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, NEUROETHICS |
title |
RECASTING THE NATURALISM–NORMATIVITY DEBATE: NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, NEUROETHICS |
spellingShingle |
RECASTING THE NATURALISM–NORMATIVITY DEBATE: NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, NEUROETHICS Oliveira, Nythamar de Neurophilosophy Neuroscience Naturalism Normativety Neuroethics |
title_short |
RECASTING THE NATURALISM–NORMATIVITY DEBATE: NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, NEUROETHICS |
title_full |
RECASTING THE NATURALISM–NORMATIVITY DEBATE: NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, NEUROETHICS |
title_fullStr |
RECASTING THE NATURALISM–NORMATIVITY DEBATE: NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, NEUROETHICS |
title_full_unstemmed |
RECASTING THE NATURALISM–NORMATIVITY DEBATE: NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, NEUROETHICS |
title_sort |
RECASTING THE NATURALISM–NORMATIVITY DEBATE: NEUROSCIENCE, NEUROPHILOSOPHY, NEUROETHICS |
author |
Oliveira, Nythamar de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Nythamar de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Nythamar de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Neurophilosophy Neuroscience Naturalism Normativety Neuroethics |
topic |
Neurophilosophy Neuroscience Naturalism Normativety Neuroethics |
description |
Assuming that there is a "neuroscientific turn" in moral philosophy, I will be discussing in this paper how neurophilosophy could shed light on the normative problems raised by a naturalistic project of ethical and social research, particularly related to the question of the articulation between the biological evolution of human species and the social and historical evolution of society and social groups. Taking a critical approach to naturalism and normative theories, I argue that there is a neurophenomenological deficit in naturalism (particularly in the versions of naturalism that follow the program of a naturalized epistemology) and in the normative theories (particularly in the critical theory) and I put forward a version of social constructivism that combines the neuroscientific and neurophilosophical models of Antonio Damasio and Jesse Prinz. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7510 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7510 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7510/5581 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Nythamar de Oliveira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Nythamar de Oliveira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 20 n. 33 (2013): Princípios: revista de filosofia; 79-103 1983-2109 0104-8694 reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
collection |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||principios@cchla.ufrn.br |
_version_ |
1799769978290831360 |