Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barakat, Simone Ruchdi
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Freitas, Livia Paulucci, Boaventura, João Maurício Gama, MacLennan, Maria Laura Ferranty
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciências da Administração
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66
Resumo: The present study aims to analyze how the concept of “legitimacy” has been evolving in the   Stakeholders Theory. To that end, an exploratory and qualitative research has been done based on integrative literature review. The results showed that the concept of “legitimacy” still is imprecise and rarely discussed in the stakeholder literature. Few authors have attempted to formulate a definition for the concept and the majority adopts the most accepted definition. Some studies, despite using the term "legitimacy", do not offer any definition employed. Discrepancy related to legitimacy typology, aspects and objectives were found. The concept is commonly adapted to the context and objective which it is being used to. An important factor that contributes to the imprecision in the definition of the term "legitimacy" derives from the use of a very broad concept for "stakeholder". Therefore, the study contributes to the development of the concept of “legitimacy” in regard to Stakeholders Theory.
id UFSC-15_c062fa80b83816d87ca7ad66163e2e7b
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/37650
network_acronym_str UFSC-15
network_name_str Revista de Ciências da Administração
repository_id_str
spelling Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders TheoryLegitimidade: uma análise da evolução do conceito na teoria dos stakeholdersThe present study aims to analyze how the concept of “legitimacy” has been evolving in the   Stakeholders Theory. To that end, an exploratory and qualitative research has been done based on integrative literature review. The results showed that the concept of “legitimacy” still is imprecise and rarely discussed in the stakeholder literature. Few authors have attempted to formulate a definition for the concept and the majority adopts the most accepted definition. Some studies, despite using the term "legitimacy", do not offer any definition employed. Discrepancy related to legitimacy typology, aspects and objectives were found. The concept is commonly adapted to the context and objective which it is being used to. An important factor that contributes to the imprecision in the definition of the term "legitimacy" derives from the use of a very broad concept for "stakeholder". Therefore, the study contributes to the development of the concept of “legitimacy” in regard to Stakeholders Theory.O presente estudo buscou analisar como o conceito de “legitimidade” tem evoluído na Teoria dos Stakeholders. Para isso, foi realizada uma pesquisa exploratória qualitativa baseada em pesquisa bibliográfica. Os resultados mostraram que o conceito de legitimidade é ainda bastante impreciso e pouco debatido na literatura de stakeholders. Poucos autores buscaram formular uma definição para o conceito e a maioria adota a definição mais aceita. Há ainda trabalhos que, apesar de utilizarem o termo “legitimidade”, não oferecem nenhum tipo de definição empregada. Foram encontradas divergências relativas a tipologias, aspectos e objetos da legitimidade. O conceito é comumente adaptado ao contexto e ao objetivo para o qual é utilizado. Um importante fator que contribui para a imprecisão na definição do termo “legitimidade” deriva da própria utilização de um conceito bastante amplo para “stakeholder”. Portanto, o presente estudo contribui com o desenvolvimento do conceito de “legitimidade” na Teoria dos Stakeholders.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2016-04-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p6610.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.18 N.44 Abril de 2016; 66-802175-80771516-3865reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarakat, Simone RuchdiFreitas, Livia PaulucciBoaventura, João Maurício GamaMacLennan, Maria Laura Ferranty2017-07-12T11:37:59Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/37650Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/admPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/oairevista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br2175-80771516-3865opendoar:2017-07-12T11:37:59Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory
Legitimidade: uma análise da evolução do conceito na teoria dos stakeholders
title Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory
spellingShingle Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory
Barakat, Simone Ruchdi
title_short Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory
title_full Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory
title_fullStr Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory
title_full_unstemmed Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory
title_sort Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory
author Barakat, Simone Ruchdi
author_facet Barakat, Simone Ruchdi
Freitas, Livia Paulucci
Boaventura, João Maurício Gama
MacLennan, Maria Laura Ferranty
author_role author
author2 Freitas, Livia Paulucci
Boaventura, João Maurício Gama
MacLennan, Maria Laura Ferranty
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barakat, Simone Ruchdi
Freitas, Livia Paulucci
Boaventura, João Maurício Gama
MacLennan, Maria Laura Ferranty
description The present study aims to analyze how the concept of “legitimacy” has been evolving in the   Stakeholders Theory. To that end, an exploratory and qualitative research has been done based on integrative literature review. The results showed that the concept of “legitimacy” still is imprecise and rarely discussed in the stakeholder literature. Few authors have attempted to formulate a definition for the concept and the majority adopts the most accepted definition. Some studies, despite using the term "legitimacy", do not offer any definition employed. Discrepancy related to legitimacy typology, aspects and objectives were found. The concept is commonly adapted to the context and objective which it is being used to. An important factor that contributes to the imprecision in the definition of the term "legitimacy" derives from the use of a very broad concept for "stakeholder". Therefore, the study contributes to the development of the concept of “legitimacy” in regard to Stakeholders Theory.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66
10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administração
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administração
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.18 N.44 Abril de 2016; 66-80
2175-8077
1516-3865
reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administração
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista de Ciências da Administração
collection Revista de Ciências da Administração
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435142471680000