Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teixeira, Marcelo Markus
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Pereira, Reginaldo, Bieger, Andrey Luciano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n80p179
Resumo: The article deals, in the light of conventional control, with the receipt of the recommendation of the Inter-American Human Rights System to decriminalize crimes of contempt by the Superior Court of Justice. The analysis is limited to two features that guide the Court’s positions: Special Appeal 1,640,084/SP and Habeas Corpus 379,269/MS. The method is inductive and bibliographic review and documentary analysis are used as research techniques. It is concluded that the Superior Court of Justice considered only decisions in which the State was party to the litigation, which rules out the reception through the mechanism of external conventionality control.
id UFSC-3_fed608d3705bac3173769d3f00b9cd15
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/58920
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality controlOs critérios de recepção das decisões acerca dos delitos de desacato do sistema interamericano de direitos humanos no Superior Tribunal de Justiça à luz do controle de convencionalidade externoThe article deals, in the light of conventional control, with the receipt of the recommendation of the Inter-American Human Rights System to decriminalize crimes of contempt by the Superior Court of Justice. The analysis is limited to two features that guide the Court’s positions: Special Appeal 1,640,084/SP and Habeas Corpus 379,269/MS. The method is inductive and bibliographic review and documentary analysis are used as research techniques. It is concluded that the Superior Court of Justice considered only decisions in which the State was party to the litigation, which rules out the reception through the mechanism of external conventionality control.O artigo trata, à luz do controle de convencionalidade, da recepção da recomendação do Sistema Interamericano de Direitos Humanos de descriminalizar os crimes de desacato pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Restringe-se à análise de dois recursos orientadores dos posicionamentos do Tribunal: o Recurso Especial n. 1.640.084/SP e o Habeas Corpus n. 379.269/ MS. O método é indutivo e são utilizadas a revisão bibliográfica e a análise documental como técnicas de pesquisa. Conclui-se que o Superior Tribunal de Justiça considerou apenas decisões nas quais o Estado tenha sido parte no litígio, o que descarta a recepção via mecanismo do controle de convencionalidade externo.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2019-01-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n80p17910.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n80p179Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 39 No. 80 (2018); 179-201Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 39 Núm. 80 (2018); 179-201Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 39 n. 80 (2018); 179-2012177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n80p179/38197Copyright (c) 2019 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira, Marcelo MarkusPereira, ReginaldoBieger, Andrey Luciano2019-01-31T08:14:03Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/58920Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:35:04.756429Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
Os critérios de recepção das decisões acerca dos delitos de desacato do sistema interamericano de direitos humanos no Superior Tribunal de Justiça à luz do controle de convencionalidade externo
title Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
spellingShingle Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
Teixeira, Marcelo Markus
title_short Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
title_full Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
title_fullStr Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
title_full_unstemmed Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
title_sort Criteria for reception of decisions on the crimes of contempt of the interamerican human rights system in the superior court of justice in light of the external conventionality control
author Teixeira, Marcelo Markus
author_facet Teixeira, Marcelo Markus
Pereira, Reginaldo
Bieger, Andrey Luciano
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Reginaldo
Bieger, Andrey Luciano
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira, Marcelo Markus
Pereira, Reginaldo
Bieger, Andrey Luciano
description The article deals, in the light of conventional control, with the receipt of the recommendation of the Inter-American Human Rights System to decriminalize crimes of contempt by the Superior Court of Justice. The analysis is limited to two features that guide the Court’s positions: Special Appeal 1,640,084/SP and Habeas Corpus 379,269/MS. The method is inductive and bibliographic review and documentary analysis are used as research techniques. It is concluded that the Superior Court of Justice considered only decisions in which the State was party to the litigation, which rules out the reception through the mechanism of external conventionality control.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n80p179
10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n80p179
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n80p179
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n80p179
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n80p179/38197
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 39 No. 80 (2018); 179-201
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 39 Núm. 80 (2018); 179-201
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 39 n. 80 (2018); 179-201
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434803045531648

Registros relacionados