Humeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of Physics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wheeler, Billy
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2017v21n3p317
Resumo: It has been argued that the fundamental laws of physics do not face a ‘problem of provisos’ equivalent to that found in other scientific disciplines (Earman, Roberts and Smith 2002) and there is only the appearance of exceptions to physical laws if they are confused with differential equations of evolution type (Smith 2002). In this paper I argue that even if this is true, fundamental laws in physics still pose a major challenge to standard Humean approaches to lawhood, as they are not in any obvious sense about regularities in behaviour. A Humean approach to physical laws with exceptions is possible, however, if we adopt a view of laws that takes them to be the algorithms in the algorithmic compressions of empirical data. When this is supplemented with a distinction between lossy and lossless compression, we can explain exceptions in terms of compression artefacts present in the application of the lossy laws.
id UFSC-5_311408f97ebfdd21b2026c173a773a2e
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51572
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Humeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of PhysicsHumeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of PhysicsIt has been argued that the fundamental laws of physics do not face a ‘problem of provisos’ equivalent to that found in other scientific disciplines (Earman, Roberts and Smith 2002) and there is only the appearance of exceptions to physical laws if they are confused with differential equations of evolution type (Smith 2002). In this paper I argue that even if this is true, fundamental laws in physics still pose a major challenge to standard Humean approaches to lawhood, as they are not in any obvious sense about regularities in behaviour. A Humean approach to physical laws with exceptions is possible, however, if we adopt a view of laws that takes them to be the algorithms in the algorithmic compressions of empirical data. When this is supplemented with a distinction between lossy and lossless compression, we can explain exceptions in terms of compression artefacts present in the application of the lossy laws.It has been argued that the fundamental laws of physics do not face a ‘problem of provisos’ equivalent to that found in other scientific disciplines (Earman, Roberts and Smith 2002) and there is only the appearance of exceptions to physical laws if they are confused with differential equations of evolution type (Smith 2002). In this paper I argue that even if this is true, fundamental laws in physics still pose a major challenge to standard Humean approaches to lawhood, as they are not in any obvious sense about regularities in behaviour. A Humean approach to physical laws with exceptions is possible, however, if we adopt a view of laws that takes them to be the algorithms in the algorithmic compressions of empirical data. When this is supplemented with a distinction between lossy and lossless compression, we can explain exceptions in terms of compression artefacts present in the application of the lossy laws.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2018-05-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2017v21n3p31710.5007/1808-1711.2017v21n3p317Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2017); 317-337Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 21 Núm. 3 (2017); 317-337Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 21 n. 3 (2017); 317-3371808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2017v21n3p317/pdfCopyright (c) 2021 Billy Wheelerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWheeler, Billy2018-05-07T14:02:03Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51572Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2018-05-07T14:02:03Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Humeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of Physics
Humeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of Physics
title Humeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of Physics
spellingShingle Humeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of Physics
Wheeler, Billy
title_short Humeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of Physics
title_full Humeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of Physics
title_fullStr Humeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of Physics
title_full_unstemmed Humeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of Physics
title_sort Humeanism and Exceptions in the Fundamental Laws of Physics
author Wheeler, Billy
author_facet Wheeler, Billy
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wheeler, Billy
description It has been argued that the fundamental laws of physics do not face a ‘problem of provisos’ equivalent to that found in other scientific disciplines (Earman, Roberts and Smith 2002) and there is only the appearance of exceptions to physical laws if they are confused with differential equations of evolution type (Smith 2002). In this paper I argue that even if this is true, fundamental laws in physics still pose a major challenge to standard Humean approaches to lawhood, as they are not in any obvious sense about regularities in behaviour. A Humean approach to physical laws with exceptions is possible, however, if we adopt a view of laws that takes them to be the algorithms in the algorithmic compressions of empirical data. When this is supplemented with a distinction between lossy and lossless compression, we can explain exceptions in terms of compression artefacts present in the application of the lossy laws.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2017v21n3p317
10.5007/1808-1711.2017v21n3p317
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2017v21n3p317
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2017v21n3p317
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2017v21n3p317/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Billy Wheeler
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Billy Wheeler
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 21 No. 3 (2017); 317-337
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 21 Núm. 3 (2017); 317-337
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 21 n. 3 (2017); 317-337
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435107632742400