Quod Tibi Fieri Non Vis, Alteri ne Feceris: A Crítica de Habermas à Regra de Ouro

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dutra, Delamar José Volpato
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p377
Resumo: The text presents Habermas’ analysis and criticism of the role that the Golden Rule plays in Hobbes’s system. According to Habermas, the golden rule suggests the kind of arguments that Hobbes would need to deduce the natural laws, which Hobbes intends to draw only from the interested perspective of the rational selfish ego. Next, the paper presents the same criticism to Rawls, but this time based on the analysis of the strategy of the original position. The paper concludes that the contractualist strategy of both thinkers import a cognitive deficit in the sense of being unable to account for the principles of justice based on equality and freedom, that is, on the impartial point of view that would serve the interest of all.
id UFSC-5_59908380b5c0cea56d642ab1a42456f8
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/40804
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Quod Tibi Fieri Non Vis, Alteri ne Feceris: A Crítica de Habermas à Regra de OuroQuod tibi fieri non vis, alteri ne feceris: a crítica de Habermas à regra de ouroThe text presents Habermas’ analysis and criticism of the role that the Golden Rule plays in Hobbes’s system. According to Habermas, the golden rule suggests the kind of arguments that Hobbes would need to deduce the natural laws, which Hobbes intends to draw only from the interested perspective of the rational selfish ego. Next, the paper presents the same criticism to Rawls, but this time based on the analysis of the strategy of the original position. The paper concludes that the contractualist strategy of both thinkers import a cognitive deficit in the sense of being unable to account for the principles of justice based on equality and freedom, that is, on the impartial point of view that would serve the interest of all.O texto apresenta a análise e a crítica feita por Habermas do papel que a regra de ouro desempenha no sistema de Hobbes. Segundo Habermas, a regra de ouro sugere o tipo de argumentos que Hobbes precisaria para deduzir a leis naturais, as quais ele pretende extrair somente da perspectiva interessada do egoísta racional no estado de natureza. Ato contínuo, ele apresenta a mesma crítica a Rawls, mas desta feita com base na análise da estratégia da posição original. Ou seja, a estratégia contratualista de ambos os pensadores importaria em um déficit cognitivo no sentido de ser incapaz de dar conta dos princípios de justiça baseados na igualdade e na liberdade, ou seja, no ponto de vista imparcial que atenderia ao interesse de todos.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2016-09-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p37710.5007/808-1711.2016v20n3p377Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 No. 3 (2016); 377-392Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 Núm. 3 (2016); 377-392Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 20 n. 3 (2016); 377-3921808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p377/33940Copyright (c) 2021 Delamar José Volpato Dutrainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDutra, Delamar José Volpato2019-09-13T11:10:08Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/40804Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-13T11:10:08Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quod Tibi Fieri Non Vis, Alteri ne Feceris: A Crítica de Habermas à Regra de Ouro
Quod tibi fieri non vis, alteri ne feceris: a crítica de Habermas à regra de ouro
title Quod Tibi Fieri Non Vis, Alteri ne Feceris: A Crítica de Habermas à Regra de Ouro
spellingShingle Quod Tibi Fieri Non Vis, Alteri ne Feceris: A Crítica de Habermas à Regra de Ouro
Dutra, Delamar José Volpato
title_short Quod Tibi Fieri Non Vis, Alteri ne Feceris: A Crítica de Habermas à Regra de Ouro
title_full Quod Tibi Fieri Non Vis, Alteri ne Feceris: A Crítica de Habermas à Regra de Ouro
title_fullStr Quod Tibi Fieri Non Vis, Alteri ne Feceris: A Crítica de Habermas à Regra de Ouro
title_full_unstemmed Quod Tibi Fieri Non Vis, Alteri ne Feceris: A Crítica de Habermas à Regra de Ouro
title_sort Quod Tibi Fieri Non Vis, Alteri ne Feceris: A Crítica de Habermas à Regra de Ouro
author Dutra, Delamar José Volpato
author_facet Dutra, Delamar José Volpato
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dutra, Delamar José Volpato
description The text presents Habermas’ analysis and criticism of the role that the Golden Rule plays in Hobbes’s system. According to Habermas, the golden rule suggests the kind of arguments that Hobbes would need to deduce the natural laws, which Hobbes intends to draw only from the interested perspective of the rational selfish ego. Next, the paper presents the same criticism to Rawls, but this time based on the analysis of the strategy of the original position. The paper concludes that the contractualist strategy of both thinkers import a cognitive deficit in the sense of being unable to account for the principles of justice based on equality and freedom, that is, on the impartial point of view that would serve the interest of all.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p377
10.5007/808-1711.2016v20n3p377
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p377
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/808-1711.2016v20n3p377
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/808-1711.2016v20n3p377/33940
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Delamar José Volpato Dutra
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Delamar José Volpato Dutra
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 No. 3 (2016); 377-392
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 20 Núm. 3 (2016); 377-392
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 20 n. 3 (2016); 377-392
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435112578875392

Registros relacionados