Scrutiny of the Two-Dimensional Argument against Physicalism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendonça, Wilson
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Telles de Menezes, Julia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/88067
Resumo: Chalmers’s two-dimensional argument against materialism (aka the zombie argument) is arguably the most ingenious attempt to ground a view about fundamental reality on epistemic considerations. From the conceivability of a being that is physically identical to a conscious being but that is deprived of phenomenal consciousness (a zombie), the argument draws on the interplay of the primary and the second intensions of the zombie hypothesis to infer the metaphysical possibility of a zombie world, and thus the falsity of physicalism about phenomenality. By means of a detailed reconstruction of the two-dimensional argument, the paper tries to isolate its most central assumption: that the role played by an epistemic scenario (an intentional object) in the verification of the zombie hypothesis is played by a nonintentionally individuated metaphysical world (the zombie world) considered as actual. The paper argues that no non-viciously circular case for this assumption has been made. Thus, the two-dimensional argument is at best inconclusive.  
id UFSC-5_dcf0b077f8781c8c3228088c2176062f
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/88067
network_acronym_str UFSC-5
network_name_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Scrutiny of the Two-Dimensional Argument against PhysicalismEpistemic possibilitiesIntensionsMetaphysical plenitudeMetaphysical possibilitiesStrong necessitiesChalmers’s two-dimensional argument against materialism (aka the zombie argument) is arguably the most ingenious attempt to ground a view about fundamental reality on epistemic considerations. From the conceivability of a being that is physically identical to a conscious being but that is deprived of phenomenal consciousness (a zombie), the argument draws on the interplay of the primary and the second intensions of the zombie hypothesis to infer the metaphysical possibility of a zombie world, and thus the falsity of physicalism about phenomenality. By means of a detailed reconstruction of the two-dimensional argument, the paper tries to isolate its most central assumption: that the role played by an epistemic scenario (an intentional object) in the verification of the zombie hypothesis is played by a nonintentionally individuated metaphysical world (the zombie world) considered as actual. The paper argues that no non-viciously circular case for this assumption has been made. Thus, the two-dimensional argument is at best inconclusive.  Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2023-10-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/8806710.5007/1808-1711.2023.e88067Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2023); 263–279Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2023); 263–279Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 27 n. 2 (2023); 263–2791808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/88067/54358Copyright (c) 2023 Wilson Mendonça, Julia Telles de Menezeshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendonça, WilsonTelles de Menezes, Julia2023-10-22T20:38:02Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/88067Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2023-10-22T20:38:02Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scrutiny of the Two-Dimensional Argument against Physicalism
title Scrutiny of the Two-Dimensional Argument against Physicalism
spellingShingle Scrutiny of the Two-Dimensional Argument against Physicalism
Mendonça, Wilson
Epistemic possibilities
Intensions
Metaphysical plenitude
Metaphysical possibilities
Strong necessities
title_short Scrutiny of the Two-Dimensional Argument against Physicalism
title_full Scrutiny of the Two-Dimensional Argument against Physicalism
title_fullStr Scrutiny of the Two-Dimensional Argument against Physicalism
title_full_unstemmed Scrutiny of the Two-Dimensional Argument against Physicalism
title_sort Scrutiny of the Two-Dimensional Argument against Physicalism
author Mendonça, Wilson
author_facet Mendonça, Wilson
Telles de Menezes, Julia
author_role author
author2 Telles de Menezes, Julia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendonça, Wilson
Telles de Menezes, Julia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Epistemic possibilities
Intensions
Metaphysical plenitude
Metaphysical possibilities
Strong necessities
topic Epistemic possibilities
Intensions
Metaphysical plenitude
Metaphysical possibilities
Strong necessities
description Chalmers’s two-dimensional argument against materialism (aka the zombie argument) is arguably the most ingenious attempt to ground a view about fundamental reality on epistemic considerations. From the conceivability of a being that is physically identical to a conscious being but that is deprived of phenomenal consciousness (a zombie), the argument draws on the interplay of the primary and the second intensions of the zombie hypothesis to infer the metaphysical possibility of a zombie world, and thus the falsity of physicalism about phenomenality. By means of a detailed reconstruction of the two-dimensional argument, the paper tries to isolate its most central assumption: that the role played by an epistemic scenario (an intentional object) in the verification of the zombie hypothesis is played by a nonintentionally individuated metaphysical world (the zombie world) considered as actual. The paper argues that no non-viciously circular case for this assumption has been made. Thus, the two-dimensional argument is at best inconclusive.  
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/88067
10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e88067
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/88067
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1808-1711.2023.e88067
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/88067/54358
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Wilson Mendonça, Julia Telles de Menezes
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Wilson Mendonça, Julia Telles de Menezes
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2023); 263–279
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2023); 263–279
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 27 n. 2 (2023); 263–279
1808-1711
1414-4247
reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Principia (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1799875201221001216