PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Florestal (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/35106 |
Resumo: | Vertical stratification – as well as other environmental phytosociological parameters for uneven-aged stands in forest structures – is one of the factors that regulates the amount of energy present in a forest, although it is often disregarded. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of some commonly used methodologies to characterize the vertical stratification of a forest fragment. Researchers from UESB – State University of Southwest Bahia collected data in a Seasonal Forest fragment located in the city of Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil. The standard method used in the study was the Sociological Position Method. Results were compared to six other methods: IUFRO; Vega; Longhi; Calegário; Souza and Leite; and Hasenauer. The performance of each method was assessed according to the “c” coefficient. Results of the standard method showed 954 individuals (656 dominant; 232 codominant; and 66 dominated). The “c” coefficient was found to be efficient to interpret the performance of these methods. The IUFRO Method showed the best performance when compared to the Sociological Position Methods |
id |
UFSM-6_b5737761847be7eb370c5413682cf60e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35106 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-6 |
network_name_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTSAVALIAÇÃO DO DESEMPENHO DE METODOLOGIAS PARA ESTRATIFICAÇÃO VERTICAL EM FLORESTAS NATIVASphytosociologyuneven-aged standssociological position.fitossociologiaflorestas inequiâneasposição sociológica.Vertical stratification – as well as other environmental phytosociological parameters for uneven-aged stands in forest structures – is one of the factors that regulates the amount of energy present in a forest, although it is often disregarded. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of some commonly used methodologies to characterize the vertical stratification of a forest fragment. Researchers from UESB – State University of Southwest Bahia collected data in a Seasonal Forest fragment located in the city of Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil. The standard method used in the study was the Sociological Position Method. Results were compared to six other methods: IUFRO; Vega; Longhi; Calegário; Souza and Leite; and Hasenauer. The performance of each method was assessed according to the “c” coefficient. Results of the standard method showed 954 individuals (656 dominant; 232 codominant; and 66 dominated). The “c” coefficient was found to be efficient to interpret the performance of these methods. The IUFRO Method showed the best performance when compared to the Sociological Position MethodsA estratificação vertical, bem como vários parâmetros ecológicos de suma importância para a estrutura fitossociológica em florestas inequiâneas, reflete a quantidade de energia existente na floresta. O presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o desempenho das metodologias usuais de caracterização da estratificação vertical em florestas. O levantamento de dados foi realizado em um fragmento de Floresta Estacional, no município de Vitória da Conquista, no campus da Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia. A Posição Sociológica foi considerada como método padrão neste estudo. Os resultados obtidos foram comparados com outros seis diferentes métodos: IUFRO, Vega, Longhi, Calegário, Souza e Leite e Hasenauer. O desempenho dos métodos foi avaliado segundo o coeficiente “c”. Foram classificados pelo método padrão 954 indivíduos obtendo os seguintes resultados: 656 dominantes, 232 codominantes e 66 dominados. O coeficiente “c” mostrou-se eficiente na interpretação do desempenho dos métodos. O método da IUFRO apresentou o melhor desempenho em comparação ao Método da Posição Sociológica.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2018-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/3510610.5902/1980509835106Ciência Florestal; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2018); 1583-1591Ciência Florestal; v. 28 n. 4 (2018); 1583-15911980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/35106/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 Ciência Florestalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSousa Neto, Edvaldo NogueiraPaula, Alessandro deTagliaferre, CristianoGarcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto-Longue Júnior, Dalton2018-12-17T16:28:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35106Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2018-12-17T16:28:52Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS AVALIAÇÃO DO DESEMPENHO DE METODOLOGIAS PARA ESTRATIFICAÇÃO VERTICAL EM FLORESTAS NATIVAS |
title |
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS |
spellingShingle |
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS Sousa Neto, Edvaldo Nogueira phytosociology uneven-aged stands sociological position. fitossociologia florestas inequiâneas posição sociológica. |
title_short |
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS |
title_full |
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS |
title_fullStr |
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS |
title_full_unstemmed |
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS |
title_sort |
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS |
author |
Sousa Neto, Edvaldo Nogueira |
author_facet |
Sousa Neto, Edvaldo Nogueira Paula, Alessandro de Tagliaferre, Cristiano Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto- Longue Júnior, Dalton |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paula, Alessandro de Tagliaferre, Cristiano Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto- Longue Júnior, Dalton |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sousa Neto, Edvaldo Nogueira Paula, Alessandro de Tagliaferre, Cristiano Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto- Longue Júnior, Dalton |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
phytosociology uneven-aged stands sociological position. fitossociologia florestas inequiâneas posição sociológica. |
topic |
phytosociology uneven-aged stands sociological position. fitossociologia florestas inequiâneas posição sociológica. |
description |
Vertical stratification – as well as other environmental phytosociological parameters for uneven-aged stands in forest structures – is one of the factors that regulates the amount of energy present in a forest, although it is often disregarded. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of some commonly used methodologies to characterize the vertical stratification of a forest fragment. Researchers from UESB – State University of Southwest Bahia collected data in a Seasonal Forest fragment located in the city of Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil. The standard method used in the study was the Sociological Position Method. Results were compared to six other methods: IUFRO; Vega; Longhi; Calegário; Souza and Leite; and Hasenauer. The performance of each method was assessed according to the “c” coefficient. Results of the standard method showed 954 individuals (656 dominant; 232 codominant; and 66 dominated). The “c” coefficient was found to be efficient to interpret the performance of these methods. The IUFRO Method showed the best performance when compared to the Sociological Position Methods |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/35106 10.5902/1980509835106 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/35106 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5902/1980509835106 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/35106/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Ciência Florestal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Ciência Florestal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2018); 1583-1591 Ciência Florestal; v. 28 n. 4 (2018); 1583-1591 1980-5098 0103-9954 reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
collection |
Ciência Florestal (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br |
_version_ |
1799944134539083776 |