PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa Neto, Edvaldo Nogueira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Paula, Alessandro de, Tagliaferre, Cristiano, Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto-, Longue Júnior, Dalton
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência Florestal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/35106
Resumo: Vertical stratification – as well as other environmental phytosociological parameters for uneven-aged stands in forest structures – is one of the factors that regulates the amount of energy present in a forest, although it is often disregarded. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of some commonly used methodologies to characterize the vertical stratification of a forest fragment. Researchers from UESB – State University of Southwest Bahia collected data in a Seasonal Forest fragment located in the city of Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil. The standard method used in the study was the Sociological Position Method. Results were compared to six other methods: IUFRO; Vega; Longhi; Calegário; Souza and Leite; and Hasenauer. The performance of each method was assessed according to the “c” coefficient. Results of the standard method showed 954 individuals (656 dominant; 232 codominant; and 66 dominated). The “c” coefficient was found to be efficient to interpret the performance of these methods. The IUFRO Method showed the best performance when compared to the Sociological Position Methods
id UFSM-6_b5737761847be7eb370c5413682cf60e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35106
network_acronym_str UFSM-6
network_name_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTSAVALIAÇÃO DO DESEMPENHO DE METODOLOGIAS PARA ESTRATIFICAÇÃO VERTICAL EM FLORESTAS NATIVASphytosociologyuneven-aged standssociological position.fitossociologiaflorestas inequiâneasposição sociológica.Vertical stratification – as well as other environmental phytosociological parameters for uneven-aged stands in forest structures – is one of the factors that regulates the amount of energy present in a forest, although it is often disregarded. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of some commonly used methodologies to characterize the vertical stratification of a forest fragment. Researchers from UESB – State University of Southwest Bahia collected data in a Seasonal Forest fragment located in the city of Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil. The standard method used in the study was the Sociological Position Method. Results were compared to six other methods: IUFRO; Vega; Longhi; Calegário; Souza and Leite; and Hasenauer. The performance of each method was assessed according to the “c” coefficient. Results of the standard method showed 954 individuals (656 dominant; 232 codominant; and 66 dominated). The “c” coefficient was found to be efficient to interpret the performance of these methods. The IUFRO Method showed the best performance when compared to the Sociological Position MethodsA estratificação vertical, bem como vários parâmetros ecológicos de suma importância para a estrutura fitossociológica em florestas inequiâneas, reflete a quantidade de energia existente na floresta. O presente trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o desempenho das metodologias usuais de caracterização da estratificação vertical em florestas. O levantamento de dados foi realizado em um fragmento de Floresta Estacional, no município de Vitória da Conquista, no campus da Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia. A Posição Sociológica foi considerada como método padrão neste estudo. Os resultados obtidos foram comparados com outros seis diferentes métodos: IUFRO, Vega, Longhi, Calegário, Souza e Leite e Hasenauer. O desempenho dos métodos foi avaliado segundo o coeficiente “c”. Foram classificados pelo método padrão 954 indivíduos obtendo os seguintes resultados: 656 dominantes, 232 codominantes e 66 dominados. O coeficiente “c” mostrou-se eficiente na interpretação do desempenho dos métodos. O método da IUFRO apresentou o melhor desempenho em comparação ao Método da Posição Sociológica.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2018-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/3510610.5902/1980509835106Ciência Florestal; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2018); 1583-1591Ciência Florestal; v. 28 n. 4 (2018); 1583-15911980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/35106/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 Ciência Florestalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSousa Neto, Edvaldo NogueiraPaula, Alessandro deTagliaferre, CristianoGarcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto-Longue Júnior, Dalton2018-12-17T16:28:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35106Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2018-12-17T16:28:52Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS
AVALIAÇÃO DO DESEMPENHO DE METODOLOGIAS PARA ESTRATIFICAÇÃO VERTICAL EM FLORESTAS NATIVAS
title PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS
spellingShingle PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS
Sousa Neto, Edvaldo Nogueira
phytosociology
uneven-aged stands
sociological position.
fitossociologia
florestas inequiâneas
posição sociológica.
title_short PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS
title_full PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS
title_fullStr PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS
title_full_unstemmed PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS
title_sort PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGIES FOR VERTICAL STRATIFICATION IN NATIVE FORESTS
author Sousa Neto, Edvaldo Nogueira
author_facet Sousa Neto, Edvaldo Nogueira
Paula, Alessandro de
Tagliaferre, Cristiano
Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto-
Longue Júnior, Dalton
author_role author
author2 Paula, Alessandro de
Tagliaferre, Cristiano
Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto-
Longue Júnior, Dalton
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa Neto, Edvaldo Nogueira
Paula, Alessandro de
Tagliaferre, Cristiano
Garcia, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto-
Longue Júnior, Dalton
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv phytosociology
uneven-aged stands
sociological position.
fitossociologia
florestas inequiâneas
posição sociológica.
topic phytosociology
uneven-aged stands
sociological position.
fitossociologia
florestas inequiâneas
posição sociológica.
description Vertical stratification – as well as other environmental phytosociological parameters for uneven-aged stands in forest structures – is one of the factors that regulates the amount of energy present in a forest, although it is often disregarded. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of some commonly used methodologies to characterize the vertical stratification of a forest fragment. Researchers from UESB – State University of Southwest Bahia collected data in a Seasonal Forest fragment located in the city of Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil. The standard method used in the study was the Sociological Position Method. Results were compared to six other methods: IUFRO; Vega; Longhi; Calegário; Souza and Leite; and Hasenauer. The performance of each method was assessed according to the “c” coefficient. Results of the standard method showed 954 individuals (656 dominant; 232 codominant; and 66 dominated). The “c” coefficient was found to be efficient to interpret the performance of these methods. The IUFRO Method showed the best performance when compared to the Sociological Position Methods
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/35106
10.5902/1980509835106
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/35106
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/1980509835106
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/35106/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Ciência Florestal
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Ciência Florestal
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal; Vol. 28 No. 4 (2018); 1583-1591
Ciência Florestal; v. 28 n. 4 (2018); 1583-1591
1980-5098
0103-9954
reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
collection Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br
_version_ 1799944134539083776