Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sader, Helio S. [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Fritsche, Thomas R., Jones, Ronald N.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/28758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.3.1101-1104.2006
Resumo: One hundred recent clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were used to assess the quantitative (MIC) and qualitative (susceptibility category) accuracies of the MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2 automated susceptibility test systems when five-broad spectrum beta-lactams, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam, were tested. Isolates were selected so that the MICs for the isolates over-represented the MICs near the breakpoints to assess precisely the agreement between the results obtained with the automated systems and the results obtained by the reference tests. the categorical and MIC results from the automated systems were compared to the consensus result of three reference methods: broth microdilution, agar dilution, and disk diffusion. the consensus categorical testing (susceptibility and resistance) rates were 47 and 27%, respectively, for aztreonam; 59 and 14%, respectively, for cefepime; 44 and 43%, respectively, for ceftazidime; 71 and 19%, respectively, for imipenem; and 50 and 50%, respectively, for piperacillin-tazobactam. All systems tested exhibited a high, unacceptable level of very major (false-susceptible) errors for piperacillin-tazobactam (19 to 27%). Major (false-resistant) error rates were generally acceptable (0 to 3%), but minor error rates were elevated (8 to 32%) for cefepime (VITEK 2 and VITEK) and for aztreonam (all three systems), leading to consistent trends toward false resistance. Manufacturer reevaluation of these automated systems for the testing of selected beta-lactams with current clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa that exhibit contemporary resistance mechanisms would be prudent to minimize the potential for serious reporting errors.
id UFSP_3011d0449a7f9379fc6c038c6efff66e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/28758
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Sader, Helio S. [UNIFESP]Fritsche, Thomas R.Jones, Ronald N.JMI Labs IncUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Tufts Univ2016-01-24T12:41:00Z2016-01-24T12:41:00Z2006-03-01Journal of Clinical Microbiology. Washington: Amer Soc Microbiology, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1101-1104, 2006.0095-1137http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/28758http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.3.1101-1104.2006WOS000236095000066.pdf10.1128/JCM.44.3.1101-1104.2006WOS:000236095000066One hundred recent clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were used to assess the quantitative (MIC) and qualitative (susceptibility category) accuracies of the MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2 automated susceptibility test systems when five-broad spectrum beta-lactams, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam, were tested. Isolates were selected so that the MICs for the isolates over-represented the MICs near the breakpoints to assess precisely the agreement between the results obtained with the automated systems and the results obtained by the reference tests. the categorical and MIC results from the automated systems were compared to the consensus result of three reference methods: broth microdilution, agar dilution, and disk diffusion. the consensus categorical testing (susceptibility and resistance) rates were 47 and 27%, respectively, for aztreonam; 59 and 14%, respectively, for cefepime; 44 and 43%, respectively, for ceftazidime; 71 and 19%, respectively, for imipenem; and 50 and 50%, respectively, for piperacillin-tazobactam. All systems tested exhibited a high, unacceptable level of very major (false-susceptible) errors for piperacillin-tazobactam (19 to 27%). Major (false-resistant) error rates were generally acceptable (0 to 3%), but minor error rates were elevated (8 to 32%) for cefepime (VITEK 2 and VITEK) and for aztreonam (all three systems), leading to consistent trends toward false resistance. Manufacturer reevaluation of these automated systems for the testing of selected beta-lactams with current clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa that exhibit contemporary resistance mechanisms would be prudent to minimize the potential for serious reporting errors.JMI Labs Inc, N Liberty, IA 52317 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Div Infect Dis, São Paulo, BrazilTufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Div Infect Dis, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Science1101-1104engAmer Soc MicrobiologyJournal of Clinical MicrobiologyAccuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agentsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESPORIGINALWOS000236095000066.pdfapplication/pdf55672${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/28758/1/WOS000236095000066.pdfe65b49adc9904c8afb93da409e3a5f4fMD51open accessTEXTWOS000236095000066.pdf.txtWOS000236095000066.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain24831${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/28758/2/WOS000236095000066.pdf.txtb91ad9b34ff50ade356133827e65b22fMD52open access11600/287582023-01-12 21:39:40.668open accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/28758Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-01-13T00:39:40Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents
title Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents
spellingShingle Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents
Sader, Helio S. [UNIFESP]
title_short Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents
title_full Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents
title_fullStr Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents
title_sort Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents
author Sader, Helio S. [UNIFESP]
author_facet Sader, Helio S. [UNIFESP]
Fritsche, Thomas R.
Jones, Ronald N.
author_role author
author2 Fritsche, Thomas R.
Jones, Ronald N.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv JMI Labs Inc
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Tufts Univ
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sader, Helio S. [UNIFESP]
Fritsche, Thomas R.
Jones, Ronald N.
description One hundred recent clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were used to assess the quantitative (MIC) and qualitative (susceptibility category) accuracies of the MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2 automated susceptibility test systems when five-broad spectrum beta-lactams, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam, were tested. Isolates were selected so that the MICs for the isolates over-represented the MICs near the breakpoints to assess precisely the agreement between the results obtained with the automated systems and the results obtained by the reference tests. the categorical and MIC results from the automated systems were compared to the consensus result of three reference methods: broth microdilution, agar dilution, and disk diffusion. the consensus categorical testing (susceptibility and resistance) rates were 47 and 27%, respectively, for aztreonam; 59 and 14%, respectively, for cefepime; 44 and 43%, respectively, for ceftazidime; 71 and 19%, respectively, for imipenem; and 50 and 50%, respectively, for piperacillin-tazobactam. All systems tested exhibited a high, unacceptable level of very major (false-susceptible) errors for piperacillin-tazobactam (19 to 27%). Major (false-resistant) error rates were generally acceptable (0 to 3%), but minor error rates were elevated (8 to 32%) for cefepime (VITEK 2 and VITEK) and for aztreonam (all three systems), leading to consistent trends toward false resistance. Manufacturer reevaluation of these automated systems for the testing of selected beta-lactams with current clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa that exhibit contemporary resistance mechanisms would be prudent to minimize the potential for serious reporting errors.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2006-03-01
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T12:41:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2016-01-24T12:41:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Journal of Clinical Microbiology. Washington: Amer Soc Microbiology, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1101-1104, 2006.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/28758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.3.1101-1104.2006
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0095-1137
dc.identifier.file.none.fl_str_mv WOS000236095000066.pdf
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1128/JCM.44.3.1101-1104.2006
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000236095000066
identifier_str_mv Journal of Clinical Microbiology. Washington: Amer Soc Microbiology, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1101-1104, 2006.
0095-1137
WOS000236095000066.pdf
10.1128/JCM.44.3.1101-1104.2006
WOS:000236095000066
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/28758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.3.1101-1104.2006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Clinical Microbiology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1101-1104
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Soc Microbiology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Soc Microbiology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv ${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/28758/1/WOS000236095000066.pdf
${dspace.ui.url}/bitstream/11600/28758/2/WOS000236095000066.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e65b49adc9904c8afb93da409e3a5f4f
b91ad9b34ff50ade356133827e65b22f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802764113521147904