Methacholine vs adenosine on intra and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with cough variant asthma

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, M. [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Pereira, C. A. C. [UNIFESP], Nery, L. E. [UNIFESP], Beppu, O. S. [UNIFESP], Silva, C. O. S. [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01589.x
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/30616
Resumo: Background: Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) can be studied by bronchoprovocation test (BPT) using direct (methacholine - MCh) or indirect (adenosine 5'-monophosphate - AMP) stimuli. These two substances have not been compared in cough variant asthma (CVA).Objective: We designed a randomized, single-blind, cross-over study to compare AMP and MCh in the detection of CVA. Additionally, we examined whether assessment of extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness (EAHR) during MCh and AMP helped in the evaluation of CVA.Methods: Patients with CVA with previous positive MCh BPT performed challenges with AMP and MCh. the variables were: (i) a provocative dose producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) value (PD(20)MCh); (ii) a provocative dose producing a 25% fall in the maximal mid-inspiratory flow (FIF(50)) from baseline (PD(25)MCh) for MCh; (iii) a provocative concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV(1) value (PC(20)AMP) and (iv) a provocative concentration producing a 25% fall in the FIF(50) from baseline (PC(25)AMP) for AMP.Results: All 113 patients with CVA responded to PD(20)MCh and 96% and 69% responded to PC(20)AMP, if we used PC(20) <= 200 mg/ml or PC(20) <= 100 mg/ml, respectively, with an excellent correlation between these two tests (r = 0.87 and 0.76, respectively). Extrathoracic AHR associated with AHR was found in 10% in MCh challenge and in 11% with AMP challenge and no patients had EAHR alone.Conclusion: Adenosine challenges correlate well with MCh in patients with CVA. A minority (c. 10%) of CVA patients have EAHR as measured by these tests, while most had AHR as assessed with each of the challenge agents.
id UFSP_30c5a89a3fe29c1c445fb441d15d1e57
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/30616
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Methacholine vs adenosine on intra and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with cough variant asthmaBackground: Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) can be studied by bronchoprovocation test (BPT) using direct (methacholine - MCh) or indirect (adenosine 5'-monophosphate - AMP) stimuli. These two substances have not been compared in cough variant asthma (CVA).Objective: We designed a randomized, single-blind, cross-over study to compare AMP and MCh in the detection of CVA. Additionally, we examined whether assessment of extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness (EAHR) during MCh and AMP helped in the evaluation of CVA.Methods: Patients with CVA with previous positive MCh BPT performed challenges with AMP and MCh. the variables were: (i) a provocative dose producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) value (PD(20)MCh); (ii) a provocative dose producing a 25% fall in the maximal mid-inspiratory flow (FIF(50)) from baseline (PD(25)MCh) for MCh; (iii) a provocative concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV(1) value (PC(20)AMP) and (iv) a provocative concentration producing a 25% fall in the FIF(50) from baseline (PC(25)AMP) for AMP.Results: All 113 patients with CVA responded to PD(20)MCh and 96% and 69% responded to PC(20)AMP, if we used PC(20) <= 200 mg/ml or PC(20) <= 100 mg/ml, respectively, with an excellent correlation between these two tests (r = 0.87 and 0.76, respectively). Extrathoracic AHR associated with AHR was found in 10% in MCh challenge and in 11% with AMP challenge and no patients had EAHR alone.Conclusion: Adenosine challenges correlate well with MCh in patients with CVA. A minority (c. 10%) of CVA patients have EAHR as measured by these tests, while most had AHR as assessed with each of the challenge agents.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, UNIFESP, Dept Med, Div Resp, BR-01228000 São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, UNIFESP, Dept Med, Div Resp, BR-01228000 São Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of ScienceWiley-BlackwellUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Ribeiro, M. [UNIFESP]Pereira, C. A. C. [UNIFESP]Nery, L. E. [UNIFESP]Beppu, O. S. [UNIFESP]Silva, C. O. S. [UNIFESP]2016-01-24T13:49:46Z2016-01-24T13:49:46Z2008-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion527-532http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01589.xAllergy. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc, v. 63, n. 5, p. 527-532, 2008.10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01589.x0105-4538http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/30616WOS:000254638700006engAllergyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.htmlreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2023-02-14T15:23:15Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/30616Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652023-02-14T15:23:15Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methacholine vs adenosine on intra and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with cough variant asthma
title Methacholine vs adenosine on intra and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with cough variant asthma
spellingShingle Methacholine vs adenosine on intra and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with cough variant asthma
Ribeiro, M. [UNIFESP]
title_short Methacholine vs adenosine on intra and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with cough variant asthma
title_full Methacholine vs adenosine on intra and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with cough variant asthma
title_fullStr Methacholine vs adenosine on intra and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with cough variant asthma
title_full_unstemmed Methacholine vs adenosine on intra and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with cough variant asthma
title_sort Methacholine vs adenosine on intra and extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with cough variant asthma
author Ribeiro, M. [UNIFESP]
author_facet Ribeiro, M. [UNIFESP]
Pereira, C. A. C. [UNIFESP]
Nery, L. E. [UNIFESP]
Beppu, O. S. [UNIFESP]
Silva, C. O. S. [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Pereira, C. A. C. [UNIFESP]
Nery, L. E. [UNIFESP]
Beppu, O. S. [UNIFESP]
Silva, C. O. S. [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, M. [UNIFESP]
Pereira, C. A. C. [UNIFESP]
Nery, L. E. [UNIFESP]
Beppu, O. S. [UNIFESP]
Silva, C. O. S. [UNIFESP]
description Background: Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) can be studied by bronchoprovocation test (BPT) using direct (methacholine - MCh) or indirect (adenosine 5'-monophosphate - AMP) stimuli. These two substances have not been compared in cough variant asthma (CVA).Objective: We designed a randomized, single-blind, cross-over study to compare AMP and MCh in the detection of CVA. Additionally, we examined whether assessment of extrathoracic airway hyperresponsiveness (EAHR) during MCh and AMP helped in the evaluation of CVA.Methods: Patients with CVA with previous positive MCh BPT performed challenges with AMP and MCh. the variables were: (i) a provocative dose producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) value (PD(20)MCh); (ii) a provocative dose producing a 25% fall in the maximal mid-inspiratory flow (FIF(50)) from baseline (PD(25)MCh) for MCh; (iii) a provocative concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV(1) value (PC(20)AMP) and (iv) a provocative concentration producing a 25% fall in the FIF(50) from baseline (PC(25)AMP) for AMP.Results: All 113 patients with CVA responded to PD(20)MCh and 96% and 69% responded to PC(20)AMP, if we used PC(20) <= 200 mg/ml or PC(20) <= 100 mg/ml, respectively, with an excellent correlation between these two tests (r = 0.87 and 0.76, respectively). Extrathoracic AHR associated with AHR was found in 10% in MCh challenge and in 11% with AMP challenge and no patients had EAHR alone.Conclusion: Adenosine challenges correlate well with MCh in patients with CVA. A minority (c. 10%) of CVA patients have EAHR as measured by these tests, while most had AHR as assessed with each of the challenge agents.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-05-01
2016-01-24T13:49:46Z
2016-01-24T13:49:46Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01589.x
Allergy. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc, v. 63, n. 5, p. 527-532, 2008.
10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01589.x
0105-4538
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/30616
WOS:000254638700006
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01589.x
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/30616
identifier_str_mv Allergy. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc, v. 63, n. 5, p. 527-532, 2008.
10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01589.x
0105-4538
WOS:000254638700006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Allergy
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 527-532
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley-Blackwell
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley-Blackwell
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268328376532992