Argumentation and ethos in TV debates about soccer

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Khalil, Lucas Martins Gama
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Domínios de Lingu@gem
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/31582
Resumo: This article aims to analyze the functioning of argumentation in debates of some sports TV shows. We assume that, although every text has an argumentative dimension, it is in strictu sensu argumentative texts, according nomenclature by Travaglia (1991), that we can identify, with a more manifest regularity, types of recurring arguments. Considering this perspective, Argumentative Semantics deals with several typological categorizations derived both from the Classical Rhetoric as the so-called New Rhetoric. Our hypothesis is based on the idea that in debates about soccer in TV shows, besides presenting some types of arguments with recurrence, the question of the ethos plays a crucial role. To develop this discussion, we will explore a counterpoint between the debates of two sports TV shows, one of the broadcast television and one of the cable television, in order to discuss the different constitutions of images of enunciators into these situations of argumentation.
id UFU-12_ac1b918d14406089ea63da056b725d4c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/31582
network_acronym_str UFU-12
network_name_str Domínios de Lingu@gem
repository_id_str
spelling Argumentation and ethos in TV debates about soccerArgumentação e ethos em debates televisivos sobre futebolArgumentaçãoEthosFutebolArgumentationEthosSoccerThis article aims to analyze the functioning of argumentation in debates of some sports TV shows. We assume that, although every text has an argumentative dimension, it is in strictu sensu argumentative texts, according nomenclature by Travaglia (1991), that we can identify, with a more manifest regularity, types of recurring arguments. Considering this perspective, Argumentative Semantics deals with several typological categorizations derived both from the Classical Rhetoric as the so-called New Rhetoric. Our hypothesis is based on the idea that in debates about soccer in TV shows, besides presenting some types of arguments with recurrence, the question of the ethos plays a crucial role. To develop this discussion, we will explore a counterpoint between the debates of two sports TV shows, one of the broadcast television and one of the cable television, in order to discuss the different constitutions of images of enunciators into these situations of argumentation.Este artigo objetiva analisar o funcionamento da argumentação em debates de determinados programas esportivos televisivos. Partimos da assunção de que, embora todo texto tenha uma dimensão argumentativa, é nos textos argumentativos strictu sensu, de acordo com nomenclatura de Travaglia (1991), que podemos identificar, com uma regularidade mais manifesta, tipos de argumentos recorrentes. Nessa perspectiva, a Semântica Argumentativa lida com várias categorizações tipológicas provenientes tanto da Retórica Clássica quanto da chamada Nova Retórica. Nossa hipótese reside na ideia de que, em mesas-redondas de futebol, além de determinados tipos de argumentos emergirem com recorrência, a questão do ethos exerce um papel fundamental. Para desenvolver essa discussão, realizaremos um contraponto entre os debates de dois programas esportivos, um da televisão aberta e outro da televisão fechada, a fim de abordar as diferentes constituições das imagens dos enunciadores nessas situações de argumentação.PP/UFU2016-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/3158210.14393/DL21-v10n1a2016-2Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2016): Número Atemático; 16-45Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2016): Número Atemático; 16-45Domínios de Lingu@gem; v. 10 n. 1 (2016): Número Atemático; 16-451980-5799reponame:Domínios de Lingu@geminstname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/31582/18081Copyright (c) 2016 Lucas Martins Gama Khalilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKhalil, Lucas Martins Gama2020-06-26T16:13:10Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/31582Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagemPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/oairevistadominios@ileel.ufu.br||1980-57991980-5799opendoar:2020-06-26T16:13:10Domínios de Lingu@gem - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Argumentation and ethos in TV debates about soccer
Argumentação e ethos em debates televisivos sobre futebol
title Argumentation and ethos in TV debates about soccer
spellingShingle Argumentation and ethos in TV debates about soccer
Khalil, Lucas Martins Gama
Argumentação
Ethos
Futebol
Argumentation
Ethos
Soccer
title_short Argumentation and ethos in TV debates about soccer
title_full Argumentation and ethos in TV debates about soccer
title_fullStr Argumentation and ethos in TV debates about soccer
title_full_unstemmed Argumentation and ethos in TV debates about soccer
title_sort Argumentation and ethos in TV debates about soccer
author Khalil, Lucas Martins Gama
author_facet Khalil, Lucas Martins Gama
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Khalil, Lucas Martins Gama
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Argumentação
Ethos
Futebol
Argumentation
Ethos
Soccer
topic Argumentação
Ethos
Futebol
Argumentation
Ethos
Soccer
description This article aims to analyze the functioning of argumentation in debates of some sports TV shows. We assume that, although every text has an argumentative dimension, it is in strictu sensu argumentative texts, according nomenclature by Travaglia (1991), that we can identify, with a more manifest regularity, types of recurring arguments. Considering this perspective, Argumentative Semantics deals with several typological categorizations derived both from the Classical Rhetoric as the so-called New Rhetoric. Our hypothesis is based on the idea that in debates about soccer in TV shows, besides presenting some types of arguments with recurrence, the question of the ethos plays a crucial role. To develop this discussion, we will explore a counterpoint between the debates of two sports TV shows, one of the broadcast television and one of the cable television, in order to discuss the different constitutions of images of enunciators into these situations of argumentation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/31582
10.14393/DL21-v10n1a2016-2
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/31582
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/DL21-v10n1a2016-2
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/dominiosdelinguagem/article/view/31582/18081
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Lucas Martins Gama Khalil
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Lucas Martins Gama Khalil
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PP/UFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PP/UFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2016): Número Atemático; 16-45
Domínios de Lingu@gem; Vol. 10 Núm. 1 (2016): Número Atemático; 16-45
Domínios de Lingu@gem; v. 10 n. 1 (2016): Número Atemático; 16-45
1980-5799
reponame:Domínios de Lingu@gem
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Domínios de Lingu@gem
collection Domínios de Lingu@gem
repository.name.fl_str_mv Domínios de Lingu@gem - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadominios@ileel.ufu.br||
_version_ 1797067714821357568

Registros relacionados