Minimally invasive approach in esthetic dentistry: composite resin versus ceramics veneers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reis, Giselle Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Vilela, Ana Laura Rezende, Silva, Fernanda Pereira, Borges, Marcela Gonçalves, Santos-Filho, Paulo César de Freitas, Menezes, Murilo de Sousa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/34617
Resumo: Unsatisfactory anatomical shape of anterior tooth promotes disharmony in the smile esthetics. The conservative dental esthetic reestablishment treatments has been improved and evaluated with the development of adhesive materials. The adhesive dentistry allowed minimally invasive preparation through direct treatments with composite resin and indirect ceramic laminates veneers. These two treatments methods present advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this manuscript is to describe two clinical reports and compare alternatives to rehabilitate the smile esthetic appearance by direct and indirect minimally invasive treatments.  In the first case, a 24-years-old patient, female, complained of unsatisfactory anterior maxillary size and incisal wear. After the functional and esthetic planning, nanoparticle composite resin by free hand technique was indicated to rehabilitation. In the second case, a 24-years-old patient, male, reported dissatisfied with his anterior central incisive shape. On clinical examination, maxillary anterior conoid teeth were verified. Based on this evaluation, a conservative treatment using minimally invasive ceramic veneers in maxillary central and lateral incisor and ceramic fragments on canine was planed to the smile rehabilitation. It can be concluded that conservative treatment using direct composite resin restorations and minimum thickness ceramic veneers laminate, even with their specific limitations and advantages, provide satisfactory esthetic and functional treatment results, preserving the dental structure.
id UFU-14_8071221ec1c0df8e46ee957a6eaee6b1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/34617
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Minimally invasive approach in esthetic dentistry: composite resin versus ceramics veneers Abordagem minimamente invasiva em odontologia estética: resina composta versus facetas cerâmicasTooth PreparationDiastemataCosmetic DentistryHealth SciencesUnsatisfactory anatomical shape of anterior tooth promotes disharmony in the smile esthetics. The conservative dental esthetic reestablishment treatments has been improved and evaluated with the development of adhesive materials. The adhesive dentistry allowed minimally invasive preparation through direct treatments with composite resin and indirect ceramic laminates veneers. These two treatments methods present advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this manuscript is to describe two clinical reports and compare alternatives to rehabilitate the smile esthetic appearance by direct and indirect minimally invasive treatments.  In the first case, a 24-years-old patient, female, complained of unsatisfactory anterior maxillary size and incisal wear. After the functional and esthetic planning, nanoparticle composite resin by free hand technique was indicated to rehabilitation. In the second case, a 24-years-old patient, male, reported dissatisfied with his anterior central incisive shape. On clinical examination, maxillary anterior conoid teeth were verified. Based on this evaluation, a conservative treatment using minimally invasive ceramic veneers in maxillary central and lateral incisor and ceramic fragments on canine was planed to the smile rehabilitation. It can be concluded that conservative treatment using direct composite resin restorations and minimum thickness ceramic veneers laminate, even with their specific limitations and advantages, provide satisfactory esthetic and functional treatment results, preserving the dental structure.Dentes com formato anatômico insatisfatório podem causar desarmonia na estética do sorriso. Os tratamentos para restabelecer a estética do sorriso vêm evoluindo concomitantemente com o desenvolvimento dos materiais dentários. A odontologia estética permite um preparo minimamente invasivo através de resinas compostas e laminados cerâmicos.  Estes dois métodos de tratamento apresentam algumas vantagens e desvantagens. O objetivo deste artigo é descrever dois relatos de casos clínicos e comparar alternativas para a reabilitação da estética do sorriso pelos tratamentos minimamente invasivos diretos e indiretos. No primeiro caso, paciente de 24 anos do gênero feminino, estava descontente com o tamanho e com o desgaste incisal dos dentes maxilares anteriores. Após o planejamento funcional e estético foi indicado restauração direta com uma resina nanopartículada pela técnica da mão livre. No segundo caso, paciente de 24 anos do gênero masculino relatou insatisfação com a forma dos incisivos centrais superiores. No exame clínico foi observado incisivos conoídes. Baseado no exame clínico foi planejado um tratamento conservador com laminados cerâmicos nos incisivos centrais e laterais, e fragmentos cerâmicos nos caninos. Pode-se concluir que os tratamentos conservadores utilizando resina composta e laminados cerâmicos, mesmo com suas limitações, promove uma estética satisfatória e resultados funcionais preservando a estrutura dental.EDUFU2017-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3461710.14393/BJ-v33n1a2017-34617Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017): Jan./Feb.; 238-246Bioscience Journal ; v. 33 n. 1 (2017): Jan./Feb.; 238-2461981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/34617/19775Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2017 Giselle Rodrigues Reis, Ana Laura Rezende Vilela, Fernanda Pereira Silva, Marcela Gonçalves Borges, Paulo César de Freitas Santos-Filho, Murilo de Sousa Menezeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReis, Giselle RodriguesVilela, Ana Laura RezendeSilva, Fernanda PereiraBorges, Marcela GonçalvesSantos-Filho, Paulo César de FreitasMenezes, Murilo de Sousa2022-02-16T16:20:50Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/34617Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-16T16:20:50Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Minimally invasive approach in esthetic dentistry: composite resin versus ceramics veneers
Abordagem minimamente invasiva em odontologia estética: resina composta versus facetas cerâmicas
title Minimally invasive approach in esthetic dentistry: composite resin versus ceramics veneers
spellingShingle Minimally invasive approach in esthetic dentistry: composite resin versus ceramics veneers
Reis, Giselle Rodrigues
Tooth Preparation
Diastemata
Cosmetic Dentistry
Health Sciences
title_short Minimally invasive approach in esthetic dentistry: composite resin versus ceramics veneers
title_full Minimally invasive approach in esthetic dentistry: composite resin versus ceramics veneers
title_fullStr Minimally invasive approach in esthetic dentistry: composite resin versus ceramics veneers
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive approach in esthetic dentistry: composite resin versus ceramics veneers
title_sort Minimally invasive approach in esthetic dentistry: composite resin versus ceramics veneers
author Reis, Giselle Rodrigues
author_facet Reis, Giselle Rodrigues
Vilela, Ana Laura Rezende
Silva, Fernanda Pereira
Borges, Marcela Gonçalves
Santos-Filho, Paulo César de Freitas
Menezes, Murilo de Sousa
author_role author
author2 Vilela, Ana Laura Rezende
Silva, Fernanda Pereira
Borges, Marcela Gonçalves
Santos-Filho, Paulo César de Freitas
Menezes, Murilo de Sousa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reis, Giselle Rodrigues
Vilela, Ana Laura Rezende
Silva, Fernanda Pereira
Borges, Marcela Gonçalves
Santos-Filho, Paulo César de Freitas
Menezes, Murilo de Sousa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tooth Preparation
Diastemata
Cosmetic Dentistry
Health Sciences
topic Tooth Preparation
Diastemata
Cosmetic Dentistry
Health Sciences
description Unsatisfactory anatomical shape of anterior tooth promotes disharmony in the smile esthetics. The conservative dental esthetic reestablishment treatments has been improved and evaluated with the development of adhesive materials. The adhesive dentistry allowed minimally invasive preparation through direct treatments with composite resin and indirect ceramic laminates veneers. These two treatments methods present advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this manuscript is to describe two clinical reports and compare alternatives to rehabilitate the smile esthetic appearance by direct and indirect minimally invasive treatments.  In the first case, a 24-years-old patient, female, complained of unsatisfactory anterior maxillary size and incisal wear. After the functional and esthetic planning, nanoparticle composite resin by free hand technique was indicated to rehabilitation. In the second case, a 24-years-old patient, male, reported dissatisfied with his anterior central incisive shape. On clinical examination, maxillary anterior conoid teeth were verified. Based on this evaluation, a conservative treatment using minimally invasive ceramic veneers in maxillary central and lateral incisor and ceramic fragments on canine was planed to the smile rehabilitation. It can be concluded that conservative treatment using direct composite resin restorations and minimum thickness ceramic veneers laminate, even with their specific limitations and advantages, provide satisfactory esthetic and functional treatment results, preserving the dental structure.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/34617
10.14393/BJ-v33n1a2017-34617
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/34617
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v33n1a2017-34617
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/34617/19775
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017): Jan./Feb.; 238-246
Bioscience Journal ; v. 33 n. 1 (2017): Jan./Feb.; 238-246
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069077061042176