The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Archai (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567 |
Resumo: | The notion of linguistic correction (Latinitas) with which Augustine of Hippo introduced his Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata seems central to the philosopher's grammatical discussion, not only because of the various examples that Augustine offers about the definitions of barbarism and soloecism at the end of this treatise, but also because the subject of correction (Latinitas) and, consequently, of the deviations of language (barbarismus and soloecismus), are also presented in other non-grammatical works: The confessions, De ordine and De doctrina Christiana. In this article, we propose to evaluate the conceptual outlines of the notions of barbarism and solecism in the work of Augustine, considering, on the one hand, the definitions present in the Ars breuiata, and, on the other, the way in which Augustine also presents them in his philosophical work. We propose that the normative orientation contained in the text of ars must be relativised by ethical questions that arise from the comments present in the Confessions, the De ordine and the De doctrina Christiana. |
id |
UNB-18_2e18a7b092233a4aba51b306ceb0e39b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26567 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-18 |
network_name_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiataLinguistic correction (Latinitas)barbarismsolecismThe notion of linguistic correction (Latinitas) with which Augustine of Hippo introduced his Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata seems central to the philosopher's grammatical discussion, not only because of the various examples that Augustine offers about the definitions of barbarism and soloecism at the end of this treatise, but also because the subject of correction (Latinitas) and, consequently, of the deviations of language (barbarismus and soloecismus), are also presented in other non-grammatical works: The confessions, De ordine and De doctrina Christiana. In this article, we propose to evaluate the conceptual outlines of the notions of barbarism and solecism in the work of Augustine, considering, on the one hand, the definitions present in the Ars breuiata, and, on the other, the way in which Augustine also presents them in his philosophical work. We propose that the normative orientation contained in the text of ars must be relativised by ethical questions that arise from the comments present in the Confessions, the De ordine and the De doctrina Christiana.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2019-08-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567Revista Archai; No. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e02710Archai Journal; n. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e027101984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_27reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567/23230Copyright (c) 2019 Fábio Fortes, Fernando Adão de Sá Freitasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFortes, FábioFreitas, Fernando Adão de Sá2019-08-28T18:38:41Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26567Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2019-08-28T18:38:41Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata |
title |
The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata |
spellingShingle |
The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata Fortes, Fábio Linguistic correction (Latinitas) barbarism solecism |
title_short |
The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata |
title_full |
The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata |
title_fullStr |
The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata |
title_full_unstemmed |
The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata |
title_sort |
The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata |
author |
Fortes, Fábio |
author_facet |
Fortes, Fábio Freitas, Fernando Adão de Sá |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freitas, Fernando Adão de Sá |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fortes, Fábio Freitas, Fernando Adão de Sá |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Linguistic correction (Latinitas) barbarism solecism |
topic |
Linguistic correction (Latinitas) barbarism solecism |
description |
The notion of linguistic correction (Latinitas) with which Augustine of Hippo introduced his Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata seems central to the philosopher's grammatical discussion, not only because of the various examples that Augustine offers about the definitions of barbarism and soloecism at the end of this treatise, but also because the subject of correction (Latinitas) and, consequently, of the deviations of language (barbarismus and soloecismus), are also presented in other non-grammatical works: The confessions, De ordine and De doctrina Christiana. In this article, we propose to evaluate the conceptual outlines of the notions of barbarism and solecism in the work of Augustine, considering, on the one hand, the definitions present in the Ars breuiata, and, on the other, the way in which Augustine also presents them in his philosophical work. We propose that the normative orientation contained in the text of ars must be relativised by ethical questions that arise from the comments present in the Confessions, the De ordine and the De doctrina Christiana. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articles Artigos |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567/23230 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Fábio Fortes, Fernando Adão de Sá Freitas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Fábio Fortes, Fernando Adão de Sá Freitas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai; No. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e02710 Archai Journal; n. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e02710 1984-249X 2179-4960 10.14195/1984-249X_27 reponame:Revista Archai (Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Revista Archai (Online) |
collection |
Revista Archai (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br |
_version_ |
1798319945452355584 |