The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fortes, Fábio
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Freitas, Fernando Adão de Sá
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Archai (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567
Resumo: The notion of linguistic correction (Latinitas) with which Augustine of Hippo introduced his Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata seems central to the philosopher's grammatical discussion, not only because of the various examples that Augustine offers about the definitions of barbarism and soloecism at the end of this treatise, but also because the subject of correction (Latinitas) and, consequently, of the deviations of language (barbarismus and soloecismus), are also presented in other non-grammatical works: The confessions, De ordine and De doctrina Christiana. In this article, we propose to evaluate the conceptual outlines of the notions of barbarism and solecism in the work of Augustine, considering, on the one hand, the definitions present in the Ars breuiata, and, on the other, the way in which Augustine also presents them in his philosophical work. We propose that the normative orientation contained in the text of ars must be relativised by ethical questions that arise from the comments present in the Confessions, the De ordine and the De doctrina Christiana.
id UNB-18_2e18a7b092233a4aba51b306ceb0e39b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26567
network_acronym_str UNB-18
network_name_str Revista Archai (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiataLinguistic correction (Latinitas)barbarismsolecismThe notion of linguistic correction (Latinitas) with which Augustine of Hippo introduced his Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata seems central to the philosopher's grammatical discussion, not only because of the various examples that Augustine offers about the definitions of barbarism and soloecism at the end of this treatise, but also because the subject of correction (Latinitas) and, consequently, of the deviations of language (barbarismus and soloecismus), are also presented in other non-grammatical works: The confessions, De ordine and De doctrina Christiana. In this article, we propose to evaluate the conceptual outlines of the notions of barbarism and solecism in the work of Augustine, considering, on the one hand, the definitions present in the Ars breuiata, and, on the other, the way in which Augustine also presents them in his philosophical work. We propose that the normative orientation contained in the text of ars must be relativised by ethical questions that arise from the comments present in the Confessions, the De ordine and the De doctrina Christiana.Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil2019-08-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticlesArtigosapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567Revista Archai; No. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e02710Archai Journal; n. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e027101984-249X2179-496010.14195/1984-249X_27reponame:Revista Archai (Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567/23230Copyright (c) 2019 Fábio Fortes, Fernando Adão de Sá Freitasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFortes, FábioFreitas, Fernando Adão de Sá2019-08-28T18:38:41Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26567Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archaiPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/oai||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br1984-249X1984-249Xopendoar:2019-08-28T18:38:41Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata
title The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata
spellingShingle The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata
Fortes, Fábio
Linguistic correction (Latinitas)
barbarism
solecism
title_short The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata
title_full The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata
title_fullStr The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata
title_full_unstemmed The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata
title_sort The notion of language deviations in St. Augustine’s Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata
author Fortes, Fábio
author_facet Fortes, Fábio
Freitas, Fernando Adão de Sá
author_role author
author2 Freitas, Fernando Adão de Sá
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fortes, Fábio
Freitas, Fernando Adão de Sá
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Linguistic correction (Latinitas)
barbarism
solecism
topic Linguistic correction (Latinitas)
barbarism
solecism
description The notion of linguistic correction (Latinitas) with which Augustine of Hippo introduced his Ars pro fratrum mediocritate breuiata seems central to the philosopher's grammatical discussion, not only because of the various examples that Augustine offers about the definitions of barbarism and soloecism at the end of this treatise, but also because the subject of correction (Latinitas) and, consequently, of the deviations of language (barbarismus and soloecismus), are also presented in other non-grammatical works: The confessions, De ordine and De doctrina Christiana. In this article, we propose to evaluate the conceptual outlines of the notions of barbarism and solecism in the work of Augustine, considering, on the one hand, the definitions present in the Ars breuiata, and, on the other, the way in which Augustine also presents them in his philosophical work. We propose that the normative orientation contained in the text of ars must be relativised by ethical questions that arise from the comments present in the Confessions, the De ordine and the De doctrina Christiana.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articles
Artigos
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/26567/23230
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Fábio Fortes, Fernando Adão de Sá Freitas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Fábio Fortes, Fernando Adão de Sá Freitas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cátedra UNESCO Archai (Universidade de Brasília); Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; Annablume Editora, São Paulo, Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Archai; No. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e02710
Archai Journal; n. 27 (2019): Archai 27 (2019 [3]); e02710
1984-249X
2179-4960
10.14195/1984-249X_27
reponame:Revista Archai (Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Revista Archai (Online)
collection Revista Archai (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Archai (Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||archaijournal@unb.br|| cornelli@unb.br
_version_ 1798319945452355584