Influence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin composite

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tessarin, Fernanda Bastos Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Meirelles, Laura Célia Fernandes, Rocha, Rafael Santos, Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz, Bresciani, Eduardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648
Resumo: Objective: To evaluate the visual perception of surface gloss of resin composite under different illuminants by different observers. Material and methods: twelve cylindrical specimens (6mm x 1mm) were fabricated using a nanofilled resin composite (Z350, A2E shade) in order to compare different observers and to determine the limit of perceptibility of surface gloss. Bovine tooth specimen with similar dimensions was obtained for the comparison of different illuminants. Polishing of resin specimens was performed resulting in 6 groups, presenting surface gloss values at 10, 25, 40, 55, 70, and 85 GU (gloss units), measured by glossmeter (NOVOCURVE). Fifteen individuals were selected: 5 lay-person, 5 undergraduate students, and 5 dental professionals. Participants observed the specimens in a light booth (Gti lightbox) under three different illuminants, and rated the possible combinations between resin specimens or with the bovine enamel specimen (85GU). Data obtained were analyzed by PROBIT non-linear regression analysis (?=0.05). Results: Differences were observed among types of illuminants (p=0.042) and ?GU (p=0.004), with no interaction between factors (p=0.139). The fluorescent light presented lower surface gloss perceptibility values in relation to incandescent light. There was no influence by type of observers (p =0.598). The surface gloss perception limit was 17.6 GU under the presented tested conditions. Conclusion: the illuminant type influenced perception of gloss, with lower percentage of perceptibility for fluorescent light, while such perceptibility was not influence by different observers. Keywords Illuminants; Observer variation; Composite resins; Surface gloss.
id UNESP-20_e6f153fbcb36f61d5c6529172eaf8d43
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1648
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin compositeObjective: To evaluate the visual perception of surface gloss of resin composite under different illuminants by different observers. Material and methods: twelve cylindrical specimens (6mm x 1mm) were fabricated using a nanofilled resin composite (Z350, A2E shade) in order to compare different observers and to determine the limit of perceptibility of surface gloss. Bovine tooth specimen with similar dimensions was obtained for the comparison of different illuminants. Polishing of resin specimens was performed resulting in 6 groups, presenting surface gloss values at 10, 25, 40, 55, 70, and 85 GU (gloss units), measured by glossmeter (NOVOCURVE). Fifteen individuals were selected: 5 lay-person, 5 undergraduate students, and 5 dental professionals. Participants observed the specimens in a light booth (Gti lightbox) under three different illuminants, and rated the possible combinations between resin specimens or with the bovine enamel specimen (85GU). Data obtained were analyzed by PROBIT non-linear regression analysis (?=0.05). Results: Differences were observed among types of illuminants (p=0.042) and ?GU (p=0.004), with no interaction between factors (p=0.139). The fluorescent light presented lower surface gloss perceptibility values in relation to incandescent light. There was no influence by type of observers (p =0.598). The surface gloss perception limit was 17.6 GU under the presented tested conditions. Conclusion: the illuminant type influenced perception of gloss, with lower percentage of perceptibility for fluorescent light, while such perceptibility was not influence by different observers. Keywords Illuminants; Observer variation; Composite resins; Surface gloss.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2018-10-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentimage/tiffimage/tiffimage/tiffimage/tiffapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/164810.14295/bds.2018.v21i4.1648Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 21 No. 4 (2018): Oct. - Dec. / 2018 - Published October 2018; 451-460Brazilian Dental Science; v. 21 n. 4 (2018): Oct. - Dec. / 2018 - Published October 2018; 451-4602178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/1290https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3482https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3483https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3484https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3485https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3486https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3487https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3488Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTessarin, Fernanda Bastos PereiraMeirelles, Laura Célia FernandesRocha, Rafael SantosCaneppele, Taciana Marco FerrazBresciani, Eduardo2020-01-28T12:07:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1648Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:19.011505Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin composite
title Influence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin composite
spellingShingle Influence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin composite
Tessarin, Fernanda Bastos Pereira
title_short Influence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin composite
title_full Influence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin composite
title_fullStr Influence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin composite
title_full_unstemmed Influence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin composite
title_sort Influence of illuminants and different observers on the perception of surface gloss of resin composite
author Tessarin, Fernanda Bastos Pereira
author_facet Tessarin, Fernanda Bastos Pereira
Meirelles, Laura Célia Fernandes
Rocha, Rafael Santos
Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz
Bresciani, Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Meirelles, Laura Célia Fernandes
Rocha, Rafael Santos
Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz
Bresciani, Eduardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tessarin, Fernanda Bastos Pereira
Meirelles, Laura Célia Fernandes
Rocha, Rafael Santos
Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz
Bresciani, Eduardo
description Objective: To evaluate the visual perception of surface gloss of resin composite under different illuminants by different observers. Material and methods: twelve cylindrical specimens (6mm x 1mm) were fabricated using a nanofilled resin composite (Z350, A2E shade) in order to compare different observers and to determine the limit of perceptibility of surface gloss. Bovine tooth specimen with similar dimensions was obtained for the comparison of different illuminants. Polishing of resin specimens was performed resulting in 6 groups, presenting surface gloss values at 10, 25, 40, 55, 70, and 85 GU (gloss units), measured by glossmeter (NOVOCURVE). Fifteen individuals were selected: 5 lay-person, 5 undergraduate students, and 5 dental professionals. Participants observed the specimens in a light booth (Gti lightbox) under three different illuminants, and rated the possible combinations between resin specimens or with the bovine enamel specimen (85GU). Data obtained were analyzed by PROBIT non-linear regression analysis (?=0.05). Results: Differences were observed among types of illuminants (p=0.042) and ?GU (p=0.004), with no interaction between factors (p=0.139). The fluorescent light presented lower surface gloss perceptibility values in relation to incandescent light. There was no influence by type of observers (p =0.598). The surface gloss perception limit was 17.6 GU under the presented tested conditions. Conclusion: the illuminant type influenced perception of gloss, with lower percentage of perceptibility for fluorescent light, while such perceptibility was not influence by different observers. Keywords Illuminants; Observer variation; Composite resins; Surface gloss.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648
10.14295/bds.2018.v21i4.1648
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648
identifier_str_mv 10.14295/bds.2018.v21i4.1648
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/1290
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3482
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3483
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3484
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3485
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3486
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3487
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1648/3488
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Dental Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Brazilian Dental Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
image/tiff
image/tiff
image/tiff
image/tiff
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 21 No. 4 (2018): Oct. - Dec. / 2018 - Published October 2018; 451-460
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 21 n. 4 (2018): Oct. - Dec. / 2018 - Published October 2018; 451-460
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1788346900623130624