Inicial development of protoargumentation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/7005 |
Resumo: | The present article focuses on the genesis of proto-oppositional conduct, defined as infantile actions interpreted as opposition to commands, desires and actions. The article assumes, as proposed by Leitão (2010; LEITÃO; FERREIRA, 2006), that such conduct constitutes remote older verbal actions of contraposition and response to opposition, seen as central constituencies of the argumentation. Based on references which place the genesis of human action and cognition in the realm of relations that are dialogically constituted (BAKHTIN; VOLOCHINOV, 2009; VYGOTSKY, 1998; 2001; WERTSCH, 1978), this article analyzes video-graphic records produced with two children, ages between the fourth week and six months of life, interacting with adults in a domestic context. Based on micro and macro-genetic analyses of these records (GRANOTT; PARZIALE, 2002), three moments were identified in the development process of proto-oppositional conduct: attribution of oppositional sense to crying; construction of infantile actions such as ‘refusal’ and, finally, interpretation of the infantile action as complex contraposition. In this last one, which implicates a displacement of the discursive place attributed to the child (LEITÃO, 2012), the child is seen not only as opposing the initiated actions by an adult, but also as proponent of new actions. |
id |
UNESP-4_3c88ffcc071208b4d4974ede55b3447c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7005 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-4 |
network_name_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Inicial development of protoargumentationDesenvolvimento da protoargumentação na interação adulto-bebêProtoargumentationChild argumentationCognitive developmentProtoargumentaçãoArgumentação infantilDesenvolvimento cognitivoThe present article focuses on the genesis of proto-oppositional conduct, defined as infantile actions interpreted as opposition to commands, desires and actions. The article assumes, as proposed by Leitão (2010; LEITÃO; FERREIRA, 2006), that such conduct constitutes remote older verbal actions of contraposition and response to opposition, seen as central constituencies of the argumentation. Based on references which place the genesis of human action and cognition in the realm of relations that are dialogically constituted (BAKHTIN; VOLOCHINOV, 2009; VYGOTSKY, 1998; 2001; WERTSCH, 1978), this article analyzes video-graphic records produced with two children, ages between the fourth week and six months of life, interacting with adults in a domestic context. Based on micro and macro-genetic analyses of these records (GRANOTT; PARZIALE, 2002), three moments were identified in the development process of proto-oppositional conduct: attribution of oppositional sense to crying; construction of infantile actions such as ‘refusal’ and, finally, interpretation of the infantile action as complex contraposition. In this last one, which implicates a displacement of the discursive place attributed to the child (LEITÃO, 2012), the child is seen not only as opposing the initiated actions by an adult, but also as proponent of new actions.O presente artigo focaliza a gênese de produções proto-opositivas infantis, definidas como movimentos corporais, gestuais e vocalizações infantis interpretadas como oposições a comandos, vontades e ações. Assume-se, como proposto em Leitão (2010; LEITÃO; FERREIRA, 2006), que tais produções constituam antecedentes remotos da contraposição e da resposta à oposição, vistas como constituintes centrais da argumentação. Fundamentandose em referências que inserem a gênese da ação e cognição humanas no âmbito das relações dialogicamente constituídas (BAKHTIN; VOLOCHINOV, 2009; VYGOTSKY, 1998, 2001; WERTSCH, 1978), este estudo analisa registros videográficos produzidos com duas crianças, entre a quarta semana e os seis meses de vida, em interação com adultos, em contexto doméstico. Com base em análises micro e macrogenéticas desses registros (GRANOTT; PARZIALE, 2002), três momentos foram identificados no processo de desenvolvimento de produções proto-opositivas: atribuição de sentido opositivo ao choro; construção de produções infantis como ‘recusa’ e, por fim, interpretação da ação infantil como contraposição complexa. Neste último, que implica um deslocamento do lugar discursivo atribuído à criança (LEITÃO, 2012), esta passa a ser vista não só como oponente de ações iniciadas pelo adulto, mas, também, como proponente de novas ações.UNESP2016-04-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/700510.1590/1981-5794-1604-6ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 60 n. 1 (2016)1981-5794reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporenghttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/7005/5718https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/7005/5726Copyright (c) 2016 ALFA: Revista de Linguísticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVasconcelos, Angelina Nunes deLeitão, Selma2016-06-28T20:07:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7005Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1981-5794&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpalfa@unesp.br1981-57940002-5216opendoar:2016-06-28T20:07:04Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Inicial development of protoargumentation Desenvolvimento da protoargumentação na interação adulto-bebê |
title |
Inicial development of protoargumentation |
spellingShingle |
Inicial development of protoargumentation Vasconcelos, Angelina Nunes de Protoargumentation Child argumentation Cognitive development Protoargumentação Argumentação infantil Desenvolvimento cognitivo |
title_short |
Inicial development of protoargumentation |
title_full |
Inicial development of protoargumentation |
title_fullStr |
Inicial development of protoargumentation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inicial development of protoargumentation |
title_sort |
Inicial development of protoargumentation |
author |
Vasconcelos, Angelina Nunes de |
author_facet |
Vasconcelos, Angelina Nunes de Leitão, Selma |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leitão, Selma |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vasconcelos, Angelina Nunes de Leitão, Selma |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Protoargumentation Child argumentation Cognitive development Protoargumentação Argumentação infantil Desenvolvimento cognitivo |
topic |
Protoargumentation Child argumentation Cognitive development Protoargumentação Argumentação infantil Desenvolvimento cognitivo |
description |
The present article focuses on the genesis of proto-oppositional conduct, defined as infantile actions interpreted as opposition to commands, desires and actions. The article assumes, as proposed by Leitão (2010; LEITÃO; FERREIRA, 2006), that such conduct constitutes remote older verbal actions of contraposition and response to opposition, seen as central constituencies of the argumentation. Based on references which place the genesis of human action and cognition in the realm of relations that are dialogically constituted (BAKHTIN; VOLOCHINOV, 2009; VYGOTSKY, 1998; 2001; WERTSCH, 1978), this article analyzes video-graphic records produced with two children, ages between the fourth week and six months of life, interacting with adults in a domestic context. Based on micro and macro-genetic analyses of these records (GRANOTT; PARZIALE, 2002), three moments were identified in the development process of proto-oppositional conduct: attribution of oppositional sense to crying; construction of infantile actions such as ‘refusal’ and, finally, interpretation of the infantile action as complex contraposition. In this last one, which implicates a displacement of the discursive place attributed to the child (LEITÃO, 2012), the child is seen not only as opposing the initiated actions by an adult, but also as proponent of new actions. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/7005 10.1590/1981-5794-1604-6 |
url |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/7005 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-5794-1604-6 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/7005/5718 https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/7005/5726 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 ALFA: Revista de Linguística info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 ALFA: Revista de Linguística |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 60 n. 1 (2016) 1981-5794 reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
collection |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alfa@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1800214376997715968 |