The (insistently) problematization of structural versus contextual for the treatment of significance: an analysis of the ‘semantic paradox’ by the Theory of Blocks Semantics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/8616 |
Resumo: | This Article shall elect the following key question: how to operate the clash or alliance between language structure and your functioning to reflect the significance in/of this relation? To apprehend this problematic, we will mobilize two objectives, which are issues that disturb the semanticist of any affiliation: how to stabilize, in Linguistic, theoretical aspects before (a) structures out of use, ambiguously semantics, and also before (b) structures that allow multiple uses, and therefore they show / produce various senses? To analyze these goals, we avail ourselves of a definition of “paradox” as corpus, which will allow us to operate, in fact, our object of study: the semantic paradox, neo-notion that observes contraries interdependent, and that we will take as a technique notion within the Theory of Semantic blocks, of Carel and Ducrot, basic theoretical affiliation of this research. Our hypothesis coincides with the our results: no matter the strategic procedure that is operating or that is named: the structural signification is way and return point on semantic analysis, which leads us to conclude that if we cannot understand the movement without the idea of inertia, we also cannot work the enunciation sense without structural signification. This condition seems to be imperative in Semantic. |
id |
UNESP-4_b8f0fae235d57e757ee6978941ea172b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8616 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-4 |
network_name_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The (insistently) problematization of structural versus contextual for the treatment of significance: an analysis of the ‘semantic paradox’ by the Theory of Blocks SemanticsA (insistente) problematização do estrutural versus contextual para o tratamento da significância: uma análise do ‘paradoxo semântico’ à luz da Teoria dos Blocos SemânticosSemantic paradoxStructural argumentContextual argumentParadoxo semânticoArgumentação estruturalArgumentação contextualThis Article shall elect the following key question: how to operate the clash or alliance between language structure and your functioning to reflect the significance in/of this relation? To apprehend this problematic, we will mobilize two objectives, which are issues that disturb the semanticist of any affiliation: how to stabilize, in Linguistic, theoretical aspects before (a) structures out of use, ambiguously semantics, and also before (b) structures that allow multiple uses, and therefore they show / produce various senses? To analyze these goals, we avail ourselves of a definition of “paradox” as corpus, which will allow us to operate, in fact, our object of study: the semantic paradox, neo-notion that observes contraries interdependent, and that we will take as a technique notion within the Theory of Semantic blocks, of Carel and Ducrot, basic theoretical affiliation of this research. Our hypothesis coincides with the our results: no matter the strategic procedure that is operating or that is named: the structural signification is way and return point on semantic analysis, which leads us to conclude that if we cannot understand the movement without the idea of inertia, we also cannot work the enunciation sense without structural signification. This condition seems to be imperative in Semantic.O presente artigo elege a seguinte questão fulcral: como operar o confronto ou aliança entre estrutura da linguagem e seu funcionamento para refletir a significância nesta/desta relação? Para apreendermos esta problemática, mobilizaremos dois objetivos, que são questões que inquietam o semanticista de qualquer filiação: como estabilizar, em Linguística, aspectos teóricos diante de (a) estruturas fora do uso, ambiguamente semânticas, e também diante de (b) estruturas que permitem vários usos, e por isso apresentam/produzem vários sentidos? Para analisar tais objetivos, valer-nos-emos de uma definição de “paradoxo” enquanto corpus, que nos permitirá operar, de fato, nosso objeto de estudo: o paradoxo semântico, neonoção que observa contrários interdependentes, e que tomaremos enquanto noção técnica no interior da Teoria dos Blocos Semânticos, de Carel e Ducrot, filiação teórica basilar desta pesquisa. Nossa hipótese é confirmada pelos resultados obtidos: qualquer que seja o procedimento estratégico que se opere ou que se nomeie, a significação estrutural é ponto de passagem e de retorno em análise semântica, o que nos leva a concluir que, se não se pode entender o movimento sem a ideia de inércia, não se pode trabalhar o sentido enunciativo sem a significação estrutural. Tal condição parece ser imperativa em Semântica.UNESP2018-08-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/861610.1590/1981-5794-1807-2ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 62 n. 2 (2018)1981-5794reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporenghttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/8616/7504https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/8616/7508Copyright (c) 2018 ALFA: Revista de Linguísticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMachado, Julio Cesar2018-09-16T20:33:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/8616Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1981-5794&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpalfa@unesp.br1981-57940002-5216opendoar:2018-09-16T20:33:09Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The (insistently) problematization of structural versus contextual for the treatment of significance: an analysis of the ‘semantic paradox’ by the Theory of Blocks Semantics A (insistente) problematização do estrutural versus contextual para o tratamento da significância: uma análise do ‘paradoxo semântico’ à luz da Teoria dos Blocos Semânticos |
title |
The (insistently) problematization of structural versus contextual for the treatment of significance: an analysis of the ‘semantic paradox’ by the Theory of Blocks Semantics |
spellingShingle |
The (insistently) problematization of structural versus contextual for the treatment of significance: an analysis of the ‘semantic paradox’ by the Theory of Blocks Semantics Machado, Julio Cesar Semantic paradox Structural argument Contextual argument Paradoxo semântico Argumentação estrutural Argumentação contextual |
title_short |
The (insistently) problematization of structural versus contextual for the treatment of significance: an analysis of the ‘semantic paradox’ by the Theory of Blocks Semantics |
title_full |
The (insistently) problematization of structural versus contextual for the treatment of significance: an analysis of the ‘semantic paradox’ by the Theory of Blocks Semantics |
title_fullStr |
The (insistently) problematization of structural versus contextual for the treatment of significance: an analysis of the ‘semantic paradox’ by the Theory of Blocks Semantics |
title_full_unstemmed |
The (insistently) problematization of structural versus contextual for the treatment of significance: an analysis of the ‘semantic paradox’ by the Theory of Blocks Semantics |
title_sort |
The (insistently) problematization of structural versus contextual for the treatment of significance: an analysis of the ‘semantic paradox’ by the Theory of Blocks Semantics |
author |
Machado, Julio Cesar |
author_facet |
Machado, Julio Cesar |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Machado, Julio Cesar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Semantic paradox Structural argument Contextual argument Paradoxo semântico Argumentação estrutural Argumentação contextual |
topic |
Semantic paradox Structural argument Contextual argument Paradoxo semântico Argumentação estrutural Argumentação contextual |
description |
This Article shall elect the following key question: how to operate the clash or alliance between language structure and your functioning to reflect the significance in/of this relation? To apprehend this problematic, we will mobilize two objectives, which are issues that disturb the semanticist of any affiliation: how to stabilize, in Linguistic, theoretical aspects before (a) structures out of use, ambiguously semantics, and also before (b) structures that allow multiple uses, and therefore they show / produce various senses? To analyze these goals, we avail ourselves of a definition of “paradox” as corpus, which will allow us to operate, in fact, our object of study: the semantic paradox, neo-notion that observes contraries interdependent, and that we will take as a technique notion within the Theory of Semantic blocks, of Carel and Ducrot, basic theoretical affiliation of this research. Our hypothesis coincides with the our results: no matter the strategic procedure that is operating or that is named: the structural signification is way and return point on semantic analysis, which leads us to conclude that if we cannot understand the movement without the idea of inertia, we also cannot work the enunciation sense without structural signification. This condition seems to be imperative in Semantic. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/8616 10.1590/1981-5794-1807-2 |
url |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/8616 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-5794-1807-2 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/8616/7504 https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/8616/7508 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 ALFA: Revista de Linguística info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 ALFA: Revista de Linguística |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 62 n. 2 (2018) 1981-5794 reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
collection |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alfa@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1800214377371009024 |