Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vallée, Richard
Data de Publicação: 1999
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695
Resumo: Plural sentences are commonly assumed to be semantically ambiguous, and to have a collective, a distributive or an intermediate reading. I criticize this view and argue that the distributive/collective/intermediate distinction is better seen not as a case of semantic ambiguity, characteristic of sentences or words as types. I suggest a minimalista view taking the colective/distributive/intermediate distinction to be truth-conditionally irrelevant, and merely qualifying utterances of true simpliciter plural sentences. The intuitions underlying the idea that plural sentences have diferente readings find an acho in our understanding of singular sentences like “Peter played a duet”. I explore this topic. My view of the readings of plural sentences can account for these intuitions. If I am right, number, connected to lexical items and sequences of lexical items in natural languages reveals how underinformative setences are, and underlines the role of interpretation in linguistic communication.
id UNICAMP-17_3ce541d23b41788acf44b5e87756c350
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8666695
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Plural sentences and semantic ambiguitySemânticaSentenças pluraisPlural sentences are commonly assumed to be semantically ambiguous, and to have a collective, a distributive or an intermediate reading. I criticize this view and argue that the distributive/collective/intermediate distinction is better seen not as a case of semantic ambiguity, characteristic of sentences or words as types. I suggest a minimalista view taking the colective/distributive/intermediate distinction to be truth-conditionally irrelevant, and merely qualifying utterances of true simpliciter plural sentences. The intuitions underlying the idea that plural sentences have diferente readings find an acho in our understanding of singular sentences like “Peter played a duet”. I explore this topic. My view of the readings of plural sentences can account for these intuitions. If I am right, number, connected to lexical items and sequences of lexical items in natural languages reveals how underinformative setences are, and underlines the role of interpretation in linguistic communication.Universidade Estadual de Campinas1999-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 2 (1999): out.; 413-444Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 22 No. 2 (1999): Oct.; 413-444Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (1999): out.; 413-4442317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695/28513Canadá; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 1999 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVallée, Richard 2022-05-23T13:34:55Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8666695Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2022-05-23T13:34:55Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity
title Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity
spellingShingle Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity
Vallée, Richard
Semântica
Sentenças plurais
title_short Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity
title_full Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity
title_fullStr Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity
title_full_unstemmed Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity
title_sort Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity
author Vallée, Richard
author_facet Vallée, Richard
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vallée, Richard
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Semântica
Sentenças plurais
topic Semântica
Sentenças plurais
description Plural sentences are commonly assumed to be semantically ambiguous, and to have a collective, a distributive or an intermediate reading. I criticize this view and argue that the distributive/collective/intermediate distinction is better seen not as a case of semantic ambiguity, characteristic of sentences or words as types. I suggest a minimalista view taking the colective/distributive/intermediate distinction to be truth-conditionally irrelevant, and merely qualifying utterances of true simpliciter plural sentences. The intuitions underlying the idea that plural sentences have diferente readings find an acho in our understanding of singular sentences like “Peter played a duet”. I explore this topic. My view of the readings of plural sentences can account for these intuitions. If I am right, number, connected to lexical items and sequences of lexical items in natural languages reveals how underinformative setences are, and underlines the role of interpretation in linguistic communication.
publishDate 1999
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1999-10-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695/28513
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 1999 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 1999 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Canadá; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 2 (1999): out.; 413-444
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 22 No. 2 (1999): Oct.; 413-444
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (1999): out.; 413-444
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216568008802304