Husserl, Frege and “the paradox”
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644957 |
Resumo: | In letters that Husserl and Frege exchanged during late 1906 and early 1907, when it is thought that Frege abandoned his attempts to solve Russell's paradox, Husserl expressed his views about the "paradox". Studied here are three deep-rooted differences between their approaches to pure logic present beneath the surface in these letters. These diferences concern Husserl's ideas about avoiding paradoxical consequences by shunning three potentially paradox producing practices. Specifically, he saw the need for: 1) correctly drawing the line between meaning analyses and logical analyses; 2) an epistemology of pure logic; 3) a subtler understanding of the semantics of statements than Frege proposed. This study is part of a project to lend insight into the questions that Russell's paradox raises for logic and epistemology once signaled by Gödel, an admirer of Husserl's work. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_5ce917b06ed7493791559ef7592b59dd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644957 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Husserl, Frege and “the paradox”Husserl. Frege. The paradoxIn letters that Husserl and Frege exchanged during late 1906 and early 1907, when it is thought that Frege abandoned his attempts to solve Russell's paradox, Husserl expressed his views about the "paradox". Studied here are three deep-rooted differences between their approaches to pure logic present beneath the surface in these letters. These diferences concern Husserl's ideas about avoiding paradoxical consequences by shunning three potentially paradox producing practices. Specifically, he saw the need for: 1) correctly drawing the line between meaning analyses and logical analyses; 2) an epistemology of pure logic; 3) a subtler understanding of the semantics of statements than Frege proposed. This study is part of a project to lend insight into the questions that Russell's paradox raises for logic and epistemology once signaled by Gödel, an admirer of Husserl's work.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-04-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644957Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 23 n. 2 (2000): out.; 101-132Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2000): Oct.; 101-132Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2000): out.; 101-1322317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644957/12381Copyright (c) 2000 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHill, Claire Ortiz2022-05-11T16:36:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644957Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2022-05-11T16:36:05Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Husserl, Frege and “the paradox” |
title |
Husserl, Frege and “the paradox” |
spellingShingle |
Husserl, Frege and “the paradox” Hill, Claire Ortiz Husserl. Frege. The paradox |
title_short |
Husserl, Frege and “the paradox” |
title_full |
Husserl, Frege and “the paradox” |
title_fullStr |
Husserl, Frege and “the paradox” |
title_full_unstemmed |
Husserl, Frege and “the paradox” |
title_sort |
Husserl, Frege and “the paradox” |
author |
Hill, Claire Ortiz |
author_facet |
Hill, Claire Ortiz |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hill, Claire Ortiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Husserl. Frege. The paradox |
topic |
Husserl. Frege. The paradox |
description |
In letters that Husserl and Frege exchanged during late 1906 and early 1907, when it is thought that Frege abandoned his attempts to solve Russell's paradox, Husserl expressed his views about the "paradox". Studied here are three deep-rooted differences between their approaches to pure logic present beneath the surface in these letters. These diferences concern Husserl's ideas about avoiding paradoxical consequences by shunning three potentially paradox producing practices. Specifically, he saw the need for: 1) correctly drawing the line between meaning analyses and logical analyses; 2) an epistemology of pure logic; 3) a subtler understanding of the semantics of statements than Frege proposed. This study is part of a project to lend insight into the questions that Russell's paradox raises for logic and epistemology once signaled by Gödel, an admirer of Husserl's work. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644957 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644957 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644957/12381 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2000 Manuscrito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2000 Manuscrito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 23 n. 2 (2000): out.; 101-132 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2000): Oct.; 101-132 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2000): out.; 101-132 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216566615244800 |