La cuestión del contexto de descubrimento en la historiografía: un análisis de la relación entre "descubrimiento" e "invención" de relatos e enterpretaciones historiográficas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1999 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8660362 |
Resumo: | The possibility of distinguishing between a context of discovery (concerned with the production and development of hypotheses and theories) and a context of justification (concerned with the logical analysis of such hypotheses and theories) has been almost exclusively considered in the field of the philosophy of natural and formal sciences. We can find three paradigmatic positions on this topic. First, the so-called "standard” conception, which regards the distinction in question as a logical difference between a psycological process of discovery, on the other hand, a set of logical arguments and inferences of justification, on the other. Second, there is the position common to both Kuhn and the Sociology of Science, which sustaines that there isn't any logic o rationality in either the discovery or the justification. Acording to this, both of them must be analyzed by Sociology, Psycology or the History of sciences. Third, the so-called “friends of discovery” reject the distinction as well, but for other reasons. From their perspective, it is possible to show there are some rational, even logical, processes and inferences in the context of discovery. In this paper, we board the possibility of a rationality of Discovery in the historiography. In the first place, we examine what “discovery" means in the historical research. In the second place, we explain what the relationship between and justification looks like in that discipline. Finally, we try to give some interesting insights so as to ground the possibility o a rational account of both contexts for the historical case. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_c97e183599c5528f063666e3f7c1bd39 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8660362 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
La cuestión del contexto de descubrimento en la historiografía: un análisis de la relación entre "descubrimiento" e "invención" de relatos e enterpretaciones historiográficasDescobertaJustificaçãoKuhnThe possibility of distinguishing between a context of discovery (concerned with the production and development of hypotheses and theories) and a context of justification (concerned with the logical analysis of such hypotheses and theories) has been almost exclusively considered in the field of the philosophy of natural and formal sciences. We can find three paradigmatic positions on this topic. First, the so-called "standard” conception, which regards the distinction in question as a logical difference between a psycological process of discovery, on the other hand, a set of logical arguments and inferences of justification, on the other. Second, there is the position common to both Kuhn and the Sociology of Science, which sustaines that there isn't any logic o rationality in either the discovery or the justification. Acording to this, both of them must be analyzed by Sociology, Psycology or the History of sciences. Third, the so-called “friends of discovery” reject the distinction as well, but for other reasons. From their perspective, it is possible to show there are some rational, even logical, processes and inferences in the context of discovery. In this paper, we board the possibility of a rationality of Discovery in the historiography. In the first place, we examine what “discovery" means in the historical research. In the second place, we explain what the relationship between and justification looks like in that discipline. Finally, we try to give some interesting insights so as to ground the possibility o a rational account of both contexts for the historical case.Universidade Estadual de Campinas1999-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8660362Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (1999): abr.; 143-171Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 22 No. 1 (1999): Apr.; 143-171Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (1999): Abr.; 143-1712317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8660362/28472Argentina; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 1999 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTozzi, VerónicaBelvedresi, Rosa2022-05-20T14:09:38Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8660362Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2022-05-20T14:09:38Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
La cuestión del contexto de descubrimento en la historiografía: un análisis de la relación entre "descubrimiento" e "invención" de relatos e enterpretaciones historiográficas |
title |
La cuestión del contexto de descubrimento en la historiografía: un análisis de la relación entre "descubrimiento" e "invención" de relatos e enterpretaciones historiográficas |
spellingShingle |
La cuestión del contexto de descubrimento en la historiografía: un análisis de la relación entre "descubrimiento" e "invención" de relatos e enterpretaciones historiográficas Tozzi, Verónica Descoberta Justificação Kuhn |
title_short |
La cuestión del contexto de descubrimento en la historiografía: un análisis de la relación entre "descubrimiento" e "invención" de relatos e enterpretaciones historiográficas |
title_full |
La cuestión del contexto de descubrimento en la historiografía: un análisis de la relación entre "descubrimiento" e "invención" de relatos e enterpretaciones historiográficas |
title_fullStr |
La cuestión del contexto de descubrimento en la historiografía: un análisis de la relación entre "descubrimiento" e "invención" de relatos e enterpretaciones historiográficas |
title_full_unstemmed |
La cuestión del contexto de descubrimento en la historiografía: un análisis de la relación entre "descubrimiento" e "invención" de relatos e enterpretaciones historiográficas |
title_sort |
La cuestión del contexto de descubrimento en la historiografía: un análisis de la relación entre "descubrimiento" e "invención" de relatos e enterpretaciones historiográficas |
author |
Tozzi, Verónica |
author_facet |
Tozzi, Verónica Belvedresi, Rosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Belvedresi, Rosa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tozzi, Verónica Belvedresi, Rosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Descoberta Justificação Kuhn |
topic |
Descoberta Justificação Kuhn |
description |
The possibility of distinguishing between a context of discovery (concerned with the production and development of hypotheses and theories) and a context of justification (concerned with the logical analysis of such hypotheses and theories) has been almost exclusively considered in the field of the philosophy of natural and formal sciences. We can find three paradigmatic positions on this topic. First, the so-called "standard” conception, which regards the distinction in question as a logical difference between a psycological process of discovery, on the other hand, a set of logical arguments and inferences of justification, on the other. Second, there is the position common to both Kuhn and the Sociology of Science, which sustaines that there isn't any logic o rationality in either the discovery or the justification. Acording to this, both of them must be analyzed by Sociology, Psycology or the History of sciences. Third, the so-called “friends of discovery” reject the distinction as well, but for other reasons. From their perspective, it is possible to show there are some rational, even logical, processes and inferences in the context of discovery. In this paper, we board the possibility of a rationality of Discovery in the historiography. In the first place, we examine what “discovery" means in the historical research. In the second place, we explain what the relationship between and justification looks like in that discipline. Finally, we try to give some interesting insights so as to ground the possibility o a rational account of both contexts for the historical case. |
publishDate |
1999 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1999-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8660362 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8660362 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8660362/28472 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1999 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1999 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Argentina; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 1 (1999): abr.; 143-171 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 22 No. 1 (1999): Apr.; 143-171 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (1999): Abr.; 143-171 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216567543234560 |