TOWARDS AN EVALUATION OF THE NORMALISATION THESIS ON IDENTITY OF PROOFS: THE CASE OF CHURCH-TURING THESIS AS TOUCHSTONE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ALVES,TIAGO DE CASTRO
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300114
Resumo: Abstract This article is a methodological discussion of formal approaches to the question of identity of proofs from a philosophical standpoint. First, an introduction to the question of identity of proofs itself is given, followed by a brief reconstruction of the so-called normalisation thesis, proposed by Dag Prawitz in 1971, in which some of its core mathematical and conceptual traits are presented. After that, a comparison between the normalisation thesis and the more well-known Church-Turing thesis on computability is carried out in three main parts: the first dedicated to highlighting some of the analogies between them; the second, their most remarkable differences; and the third, to the possible relations of dependence between the two. Based on these considerations, some concluding remarks concerning the potential of the normalisation thesis and similar approaches to the question of identity of proofs are made in the last section.
id UNICAMP-17_d139f530952ad2cf9fa5368719d40466
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-60452020000300114
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling TOWARDS AN EVALUATION OF THE NORMALISATION THESIS ON IDENTITY OF PROOFS: THE CASE OF CHURCH-TURING THESIS AS TOUCHSTONENormalisationIdentity of proofsChurch-Turing thesisDerivationNormal formAbstract This article is a methodological discussion of formal approaches to the question of identity of proofs from a philosophical standpoint. First, an introduction to the question of identity of proofs itself is given, followed by a brief reconstruction of the so-called normalisation thesis, proposed by Dag Prawitz in 1971, in which some of its core mathematical and conceptual traits are presented. After that, a comparison between the normalisation thesis and the more well-known Church-Turing thesis on computability is carried out in three main parts: the first dedicated to highlighting some of the analogies between them; the second, their most remarkable differences; and the third, to the possible relations of dependence between the two. Based on these considerations, some concluding remarks concerning the potential of the normalisation thesis and similar approaches to the question of identity of proofs are made in the last section.UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300114Manuscrito v.43 n.3 2020reponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMP10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n3.tainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessALVES,TIAGO DE CASTROeng2020-10-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-60452020000300114Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-6045&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpmwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2020-10-19T00:00Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TOWARDS AN EVALUATION OF THE NORMALISATION THESIS ON IDENTITY OF PROOFS: THE CASE OF CHURCH-TURING THESIS AS TOUCHSTONE
title TOWARDS AN EVALUATION OF THE NORMALISATION THESIS ON IDENTITY OF PROOFS: THE CASE OF CHURCH-TURING THESIS AS TOUCHSTONE
spellingShingle TOWARDS AN EVALUATION OF THE NORMALISATION THESIS ON IDENTITY OF PROOFS: THE CASE OF CHURCH-TURING THESIS AS TOUCHSTONE
ALVES,TIAGO DE CASTRO
Normalisation
Identity of proofs
Church-Turing thesis
Derivation
Normal form
title_short TOWARDS AN EVALUATION OF THE NORMALISATION THESIS ON IDENTITY OF PROOFS: THE CASE OF CHURCH-TURING THESIS AS TOUCHSTONE
title_full TOWARDS AN EVALUATION OF THE NORMALISATION THESIS ON IDENTITY OF PROOFS: THE CASE OF CHURCH-TURING THESIS AS TOUCHSTONE
title_fullStr TOWARDS AN EVALUATION OF THE NORMALISATION THESIS ON IDENTITY OF PROOFS: THE CASE OF CHURCH-TURING THESIS AS TOUCHSTONE
title_full_unstemmed TOWARDS AN EVALUATION OF THE NORMALISATION THESIS ON IDENTITY OF PROOFS: THE CASE OF CHURCH-TURING THESIS AS TOUCHSTONE
title_sort TOWARDS AN EVALUATION OF THE NORMALISATION THESIS ON IDENTITY OF PROOFS: THE CASE OF CHURCH-TURING THESIS AS TOUCHSTONE
author ALVES,TIAGO DE CASTRO
author_facet ALVES,TIAGO DE CASTRO
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ALVES,TIAGO DE CASTRO
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Normalisation
Identity of proofs
Church-Turing thesis
Derivation
Normal form
topic Normalisation
Identity of proofs
Church-Turing thesis
Derivation
Normal form
description Abstract This article is a methodological discussion of formal approaches to the question of identity of proofs from a philosophical standpoint. First, an introduction to the question of identity of proofs itself is given, followed by a brief reconstruction of the so-called normalisation thesis, proposed by Dag Prawitz in 1971, in which some of its core mathematical and conceptual traits are presented. After that, a comparison between the normalisation thesis and the more well-known Church-Turing thesis on computability is carried out in three main parts: the first dedicated to highlighting some of the analogies between them; the second, their most remarkable differences; and the third, to the possible relations of dependence between the two. Based on these considerations, some concluding remarks concerning the potential of the normalisation thesis and similar approaches to the question of identity of proofs are made in the last section.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300114
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300114
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n3.ta
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito v.43 n.3 2020
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1748950065917984768