Problematization and concept development in the classroom: considerations from the question-answer pair
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pro-Posições (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656439 |
Resumo: | This article discusses how the process of building meaning has been treated in the early years of Elementary School based on the analysis of pairs of questions and answers triggered by specific situations in which a case of meaning negotiation between students and teachers in daily classroom’s dialogues could be observed. The corpus consists of the records of the observation of Portuguese language classes of the third grade of Elementary School in a public school located in São Miguel Paulista, a district near the city of Guarulhos. The analyses indicate that both the questions planned by the teacher and the ones spontaneously made up by the students were treated as closed-ended questions, with unique and precise answers, usually involving the act of identifying one possible example of the concept in question. This observation indicates the need of having activities planned aimed to develop a work with concepts on higher levels when it comes to abstract thinking and the generalization process. |
id |
UNICAMP-18_80fccbf1184995c89db9892263094582 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656439 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-18 |
network_name_str |
Pro-Posições (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Problematization and concept development in the classroom: considerations from the question-answer pairProblematização e desenvolvimento de conceitos em sala de aula: considerações a partir do par P-RPair of questions and answersInteractionDidactic gestureConcept acquisitionPar pergunta-respostaInteraçãoGestos didáticosAquisição de conceitosThis article discusses how the process of building meaning has been treated in the early years of Elementary School based on the analysis of pairs of questions and answers triggered by specific situations in which a case of meaning negotiation between students and teachers in daily classroom’s dialogues could be observed. The corpus consists of the records of the observation of Portuguese language classes of the third grade of Elementary School in a public school located in São Miguel Paulista, a district near the city of Guarulhos. The analyses indicate that both the questions planned by the teacher and the ones spontaneously made up by the students were treated as closed-ended questions, with unique and precise answers, usually involving the act of identifying one possible example of the concept in question. This observation indicates the need of having activities planned aimed to develop a work with concepts on higher levels when it comes to abstract thinking and the generalization process.Nesse artigo discute-se de que maneira a questão do processo de significação tem sido tratada nos anos iniciais do Ensino Fundamental, a partir da análise de pares de perguntas e respostas (P-R) desencadeados por situações em que se observa uma negociação de sentido em sala de aula. O corpus é composto pelo registro de observações de aulas de língua portuguesa no 3.º ano do Ensino Fundamental, em uma escola pública localizada no bairro de São Miguel Paulista, próximo a Guarulhos. As análises indicam que tanto as perguntas planejadas pelo professor quanto as formuladas de forma espontânea pelos alunos são tratadas como questões fechadas, com respostas precisas e únicas, geralmente envolvendo a identificação de um exemplar do conceito em questão. Esse fato aponta para a necessidade do planejamento de atividades que visem ao trabalho com conceitos que se desenvolvam em níveis cada vez mais altos do ponto de vista da abstração e da generalização.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2018-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656439Pro-Posições; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2018): set./dez.; 545-566Pro-Posições; Vol. 29 Núm. 3 (2018): set./dez.; 545-566Pro-Posições; v. 29 n. 3 (2018): set./dez.; 545-5661980-6248reponame:Pro-Posições (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656439/21230Brazil; 2019Brasil; 2019Copyright (c) 2018 Pro-Posiçõesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHilário , Rosângela NogariniLopes, Márcia Cristina Romero 2019-08-30T17:28:52Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8656439Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposicPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/oai||proposic@unicamp.br1980-62480103-7307opendoar:2019-08-30T17:28:52Pro-Posições (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Problematization and concept development in the classroom: considerations from the question-answer pair Problematização e desenvolvimento de conceitos em sala de aula: considerações a partir do par P-R |
title |
Problematization and concept development in the classroom: considerations from the question-answer pair |
spellingShingle |
Problematization and concept development in the classroom: considerations from the question-answer pair Hilário , Rosângela Nogarini Pair of questions and answers Interaction Didactic gesture Concept acquisition Par pergunta-resposta Interação Gestos didáticos Aquisição de conceitos |
title_short |
Problematization and concept development in the classroom: considerations from the question-answer pair |
title_full |
Problematization and concept development in the classroom: considerations from the question-answer pair |
title_fullStr |
Problematization and concept development in the classroom: considerations from the question-answer pair |
title_full_unstemmed |
Problematization and concept development in the classroom: considerations from the question-answer pair |
title_sort |
Problematization and concept development in the classroom: considerations from the question-answer pair |
author |
Hilário , Rosângela Nogarini |
author_facet |
Hilário , Rosângela Nogarini Lopes, Márcia Cristina Romero |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lopes, Márcia Cristina Romero |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hilário , Rosângela Nogarini Lopes, Márcia Cristina Romero |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pair of questions and answers Interaction Didactic gesture Concept acquisition Par pergunta-resposta Interação Gestos didáticos Aquisição de conceitos |
topic |
Pair of questions and answers Interaction Didactic gesture Concept acquisition Par pergunta-resposta Interação Gestos didáticos Aquisição de conceitos |
description |
This article discusses how the process of building meaning has been treated in the early years of Elementary School based on the analysis of pairs of questions and answers triggered by specific situations in which a case of meaning negotiation between students and teachers in daily classroom’s dialogues could be observed. The corpus consists of the records of the observation of Portuguese language classes of the third grade of Elementary School in a public school located in São Miguel Paulista, a district near the city of Guarulhos. The analyses indicate that both the questions planned by the teacher and the ones spontaneously made up by the students were treated as closed-ended questions, with unique and precise answers, usually involving the act of identifying one possible example of the concept in question. This observation indicates the need of having activities planned aimed to develop a work with concepts on higher levels when it comes to abstract thinking and the generalization process. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656439 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656439 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8656439/21230 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Pro-Posições info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Pro-Posições |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; 2019 Brasil; 2019 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pro-Posições; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2018): set./dez.; 545-566 Pro-Posições; Vol. 29 Núm. 3 (2018): set./dez.; 545-566 Pro-Posições; v. 29 n. 3 (2018): set./dez.; 545-566 1980-6248 reponame:Pro-Posições (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Pro-Posições (Online) |
collection |
Pro-Posições (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pro-Posições (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||proposic@unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800217188935663616 |