Dialogue between courts and precedents in Brazilian Civil Process: integration in the jurisprudence of the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in upper and subnational tribunals
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11044 |
Resumo: | The dialogue between courts of justice in Brazil, with regard to a horizontal dialogue between subnational tribunals and with regard to the vertical dialogue between subnational tribunals and upper courts with the Human Rights InterAmerican Court is analyzed. Since all tribunals are obliged to obey agreements on human rights within the standards interpreted by the Court´s consultative opinions and sentences, these courts somewhat become InterAmerican Tribunals and Judges. This widening of meaning underlines the synergy with the recent Recommendation of the National Council for Justice which ruled that the Courts should observe agreements on Human Rights in Brazil and comply to decisions on human rights of the InterAmerican Court of Justice due to the need to control of conventionality of national laws. The jurisdictions of guarantees through the Court aim at guarding fundamental and human rights. It may be developed through constitutional jurisdiction and with Human Rights jurisdiction exercised by the International Courts for the interpretation of International Law. Further, this jurisdiction has a greater ambience than the InterAmerican Commission for Human Rights. |
id |
UNICESU-0_f3f56a0d7e9106bd355daf85685ce202 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11044 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICESU-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dialogue between courts and precedents in Brazilian Civil Process: integration in the jurisprudence of the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in upper and subnational tribunalsDiálogo entre cortes y precedentes en el Proceso Civil Brasileño: integración de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en tribunales superiores y subnacionalesDiálogo entre cortes e precedentes no Processo Civil Brasileiro: integração da jurisprudência da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos em tribunais superiores e subnacionaisDialogue between courtsCourt powerPrecedentsDiálogo entre cortesPoder judiciarioPrecedentesDiálogo entre cortesPoder judiciárioPrecedentesProcesso CivilThe dialogue between courts of justice in Brazil, with regard to a horizontal dialogue between subnational tribunals and with regard to the vertical dialogue between subnational tribunals and upper courts with the Human Rights InterAmerican Court is analyzed. Since all tribunals are obliged to obey agreements on human rights within the standards interpreted by the Court´s consultative opinions and sentences, these courts somewhat become InterAmerican Tribunals and Judges. This widening of meaning underlines the synergy with the recent Recommendation of the National Council for Justice which ruled that the Courts should observe agreements on Human Rights in Brazil and comply to decisions on human rights of the InterAmerican Court of Justice due to the need to control of conventionality of national laws. The jurisdictions of guarantees through the Court aim at guarding fundamental and human rights. It may be developed through constitutional jurisdiction and with Human Rights jurisdiction exercised by the International Courts for the interpretation of International Law. Further, this jurisdiction has a greater ambience than the InterAmerican Commission for Human Rights.En este artículo se presenta una exposición general sobre el diálogo de Cortes en Brasil, en relación con el diálogo horizontal entre Tribunales subnacionales y también el diálogo vertical entre los Tribunales subnacionales y los Tribunales Superiores con la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. En el actual escenario, en que todo juez o tribunal es obligado a respetar los tratados de derechos humanos dentro de los patrones interpretados por las opiniones consultivas y sentencias de esa Corte, tales instancias se vuelven, en cierta medida, también tribunales y jueces interamericanos. Esa expansión guardaría sinergia con la reciente Recomendación del Consejo Nacional de Justicia, que determinó a los órganos del Poder Judiciario que observen tratados sobre Derechos Humanos en vigencia en Brasil y que motiven sus decisiones con la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, debido a la necesidad de control de convencionalidad de las leyes nacionales. La jurisdicción de garantías, por intermedio de las Cortes, tiene como objetivo la tutela de los derechos fundamentales y de los derechos humanos. Para tanto, podrá desarrollarse por intermedio de la jurisdicción constitucional y con la jurisdicción de Derechos Humanos ejercida por Cortes Internacionales en la interpretación del Derecho Internacional. Además de eso, tales jurisdicciones poseen un ámbito de ejercicio mayor que los órganos aquí citados, como por ejemplo la propia Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Este artigo apresenta uma exposição geral sobre o diálogo de Cortes no Brasil, tanto em relação ao diálogo horizontal entre Tribunais subnacionais quanto o diálogo vertical entre os Tribunais subnacionais e os Tribunais Superiores com a Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos. No atual cenário, em que todo juiz ou tribunal é obrigado a respeitar os tratados de direitos humanos dentro dos padrões interpretados pelas opiniões consultivas e sentenças dessa Corte, tais instâncias tornam-se, em certa medida, também tribunais e juízes interamericanos. Essa expansão guardaria sinergia com a recente Recomendação do Conselho Nacional de Justiça, que determinou aos órgãos do Poder Judiciário que observem tratados sobre Direitos Humanos em vigor no Brasil e que motivem suas decisões com a jurisprudência da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos, devido à necessidade de controle de convencionalidade das leis nacionais. A jurisdição de garantias, por meio das Cortes, tem como objetivo a tutela dos direitos fundamentais e dos direitos humanos. Para tanto, poderá se desenvolver por meio da jurisdição constitucional e com a jurisdição de Direitos Humanos exercida por Cortes Internacionais na interpretação do Direito Internacional. Além do mais, tais jurisdições possuem um âmbito de exercício maior que os órgãos aqui citados, como por exemplo a própria Comissão Interamericana de Direitos Humanos. Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2022-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1104410.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n2.e11044Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 2 (2022): maio/ago.; 309-3202176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11044/7164Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAguiar Filho, Valfredo de Andrade Liziero, Leonam Baesso da SilvaDel Masso, Fabiano Dolenc 2022-09-01T20:10:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11044Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-09-01T20:10:22Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dialogue between courts and precedents in Brazilian Civil Process: integration in the jurisprudence of the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in upper and subnational tribunals Diálogo entre cortes y precedentes en el Proceso Civil Brasileño: integración de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en tribunales superiores y subnacionales Diálogo entre cortes e precedentes no Processo Civil Brasileiro: integração da jurisprudência da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos em tribunais superiores e subnacionais |
title |
Dialogue between courts and precedents in Brazilian Civil Process: integration in the jurisprudence of the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in upper and subnational tribunals |
spellingShingle |
Dialogue between courts and precedents in Brazilian Civil Process: integration in the jurisprudence of the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in upper and subnational tribunals Aguiar Filho, Valfredo de Andrade Dialogue between courts Court power Precedents Diálogo entre cortes Poder judiciario Precedentes Diálogo entre cortes Poder judiciário Precedentes Processo Civil |
title_short |
Dialogue between courts and precedents in Brazilian Civil Process: integration in the jurisprudence of the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in upper and subnational tribunals |
title_full |
Dialogue between courts and precedents in Brazilian Civil Process: integration in the jurisprudence of the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in upper and subnational tribunals |
title_fullStr |
Dialogue between courts and precedents in Brazilian Civil Process: integration in the jurisprudence of the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in upper and subnational tribunals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dialogue between courts and precedents in Brazilian Civil Process: integration in the jurisprudence of the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in upper and subnational tribunals |
title_sort |
Dialogue between courts and precedents in Brazilian Civil Process: integration in the jurisprudence of the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in upper and subnational tribunals |
author |
Aguiar Filho, Valfredo de Andrade |
author_facet |
Aguiar Filho, Valfredo de Andrade Liziero, Leonam Baesso da Silva Del Masso, Fabiano Dolenc |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Liziero, Leonam Baesso da Silva Del Masso, Fabiano Dolenc |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aguiar Filho, Valfredo de Andrade Liziero, Leonam Baesso da Silva Del Masso, Fabiano Dolenc |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dialogue between courts Court power Precedents Diálogo entre cortes Poder judiciario Precedentes Diálogo entre cortes Poder judiciário Precedentes Processo Civil |
topic |
Dialogue between courts Court power Precedents Diálogo entre cortes Poder judiciario Precedentes Diálogo entre cortes Poder judiciário Precedentes Processo Civil |
description |
The dialogue between courts of justice in Brazil, with regard to a horizontal dialogue between subnational tribunals and with regard to the vertical dialogue between subnational tribunals and upper courts with the Human Rights InterAmerican Court is analyzed. Since all tribunals are obliged to obey agreements on human rights within the standards interpreted by the Court´s consultative opinions and sentences, these courts somewhat become InterAmerican Tribunals and Judges. This widening of meaning underlines the synergy with the recent Recommendation of the National Council for Justice which ruled that the Courts should observe agreements on Human Rights in Brazil and comply to decisions on human rights of the InterAmerican Court of Justice due to the need to control of conventionality of national laws. The jurisdictions of guarantees through the Court aim at guarding fundamental and human rights. It may be developed through constitutional jurisdiction and with Human Rights jurisdiction exercised by the International Courts for the interpretation of International Law. Further, this jurisdiction has a greater ambience than the InterAmerican Commission for Human Rights. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11044 10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n2.e11044 |
url |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11044 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n2.e11044 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11044/7164 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 2 (2022): maio/ago.; 309-320 2176-9184 1677-6402 reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) instacron:UNICESU |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
instacron_str |
UNICESU |
institution |
UNICESU |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
collection |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||naep@unicesumar.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798042388803878912 |