Tripartite organizational partnerships and the wickedness of the water and sanitation sector in Brazil: an institutional analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/2040 |
Resumo: | This study aims to investigate the institutional constraints on the water and sanitation sector in Brazil that can affect the governance of tripartite partnerships (TPPs) and compromise its viability. The analysis of the institutional constraints was expressed in terms of voids, complementarities and logics. State-level discussion shows that governments carry resilient elements of institutional constraints that make difficult to discuss agency, administrative structure and the relationship between the spheres of the government, as well as questions about the effectiveness of the existent rules and laws. By a progressive case study approach we analyzed two Dutch partnership case studies – in Ghana and in Kenya - and one Brazilian case study (SISAR/Ceará). The case studies were analyzed by the lens of configurations, through the combination of strengths of the typological and taxonomic approaches, using the Dutch partnerships as the basis for the analysis of the Brazilian case study, SISAR. The Brazilian water and sanitation problems were classified as ‘wicked’ or collective action problems. Wicked problems resulted of numerous voids in the sector, as the regulatory and enforcement voids and we discussed the idea of partnering as a counter-argument for institutional voids. The TPPs emerged as a potential solution for dealing with wicked problems as they present institutional characteristics from different spheres (public and private, profit and non-profit and governmental and non-governmental) and a bundle of different logics to the provision of services and goods. When organizations are exposed to different logics, they suffer from tensions that can become real challenges to be faced. The different formats of conceptions in partnerships were translated into configurations types and each type showed a different way of relating to the 'wickedness' of problems. By the configuration structure it was possible to analyze the dynamic between the different types of TPPs. The different reactions to wicked problems in the empirical world are presented in this study in the form of institutional constraints that can restrict or enable the emergence of the TPPs and influence their governance arrangements. The TPPs configurations can be pulled according to the dominant logic that expose the different balances of forces between sectors. These forces were unfolded in dimensions that characterized each type of configuration. The wickedness of the water and sanitation’s problems were possible to be empirically identified, with the help of configurations. We conducted a qualitative research and we used data from semi structured interviews with people involved on the basic sanitation sector in the Netherlands, Ghana, Kenya and Brazil, as well as documentary sources. The lessons learned, pointed that institutional capacity is important for experiences in partnerships as well as the empowerment of civil society for a more effective participation. When the Dutch examples were transposed to the Brazilian case, elements inherent to the local context and related to institutional constraints emerged, which deserved to be discussed in a deeper way, being necessary to articulate these elements between the state level and that of the arrangements in partnerships, in order to analyze how they can interfere in their governance structures. The institutional complementarities observed in this study have demonstrated that there are incompatibilities in the water and sanitation sectors regarding to the plurality of the regulatory system, the existence of duplicity in the actors’ roles, as well as contradictions in the rules. A relevant aspect of institutional voids concerns the lack of a sector’s macro-level alignment, at a federal level, to set a standard of reference norms and guidelines for all regulatory agencies operating in the country. The state-centered mode with strong emphasis on the relation between public and private sector, and the little appreciation of civil society were the main institutional constraints identified in terms of logics. |
id |
UNICSUL-1_cb493ec181c3331da371576b93e866f0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br:123456789/2040 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICSUL-1 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
2021-04-30T18:43:30Z20192021-04-30T18:43:30Z2019https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/2040This study aims to investigate the institutional constraints on the water and sanitation sector in Brazil that can affect the governance of tripartite partnerships (TPPs) and compromise its viability. The analysis of the institutional constraints was expressed in terms of voids, complementarities and logics. State-level discussion shows that governments carry resilient elements of institutional constraints that make difficult to discuss agency, administrative structure and the relationship between the spheres of the government, as well as questions about the effectiveness of the existent rules and laws. By a progressive case study approach we analyzed two Dutch partnership case studies – in Ghana and in Kenya - and one Brazilian case study (SISAR/Ceará). The case studies were analyzed by the lens of configurations, through the combination of strengths of the typological and taxonomic approaches, using the Dutch partnerships as the basis for the analysis of the Brazilian case study, SISAR. The Brazilian water and sanitation problems were classified as ‘wicked’ or collective action problems. Wicked problems resulted of numerous voids in the sector, as the regulatory and enforcement voids and we discussed the idea of partnering as a counter-argument for institutional voids. The TPPs emerged as a potential solution for dealing with wicked problems as they present institutional characteristics from different spheres (public and private, profit and non-profit and governmental and non-governmental) and a bundle of different logics to the provision of services and goods. When organizations are exposed to different logics, they suffer from tensions that can become real challenges to be faced. The different formats of conceptions in partnerships were translated into configurations types and each type showed a different way of relating to the 'wickedness' of problems. By the configuration structure it was possible to analyze the dynamic between the different types of TPPs. The different reactions to wicked problems in the empirical world are presented in this study in the form of institutional constraints that can restrict or enable the emergence of the TPPs and influence their governance arrangements. The TPPs configurations can be pulled according to the dominant logic that expose the different balances of forces between sectors. These forces were unfolded in dimensions that characterized each type of configuration. The wickedness of the water and sanitation’s problems were possible to be empirically identified, with the help of configurations. We conducted a qualitative research and we used data from semi structured interviews with people involved on the basic sanitation sector in the Netherlands, Ghana, Kenya and Brazil, as well as documentary sources. The lessons learned, pointed that institutional capacity is important for experiences in partnerships as well as the empowerment of civil society for a more effective participation. When the Dutch examples were transposed to the Brazilian case, elements inherent to the local context and related to institutional constraints emerged, which deserved to be discussed in a deeper way, being necessary to articulate these elements between the state level and that of the arrangements in partnerships, in order to analyze how they can interfere in their governance structures. The institutional complementarities observed in this study have demonstrated that there are incompatibilities in the water and sanitation sectors regarding to the plurality of the regulatory system, the existence of duplicity in the actors’ roles, as well as contradictions in the rules. A relevant aspect of institutional voids concerns the lack of a sector’s macro-level alignment, at a federal level, to set a standard of reference norms and guidelines for all regulatory agencies operating in the country. The state-centered mode with strong emphasis on the relation between public and private sector, and the little appreciation of civil society were the main institutional constraints identified in terms of logics.Este estudo tem como objetivo investigar as restrições institucionais no setor de água e esgoto no Brasil, que podem afetar a governança de parcerias tripartites (TPPs) e comprometer sua viabilidade. A análise das restrições institucionais foi expressa em termos de vazios, complementaridades e lógicas. A discussão a nível de Estado mostra que os governos carregam elementos resilientes de restrições institucionais que dificultam a discussão sobre agência, estrutura administrativa e relação entre as esferas do governo, bem como questões sobre a eficácia das regras e leis existentes. Por meio da abordagem de estudo de caso progressivo, analisamos duas parcerias holandesas – em Gana e no Quênia - e um estudo de caso brasileiro (SISAR / Ceará). Os estudos de caso foram analisados pela lente de configurações, através da combinação das abordagens tipológica e taxonômica, utilizando as parcerias holandesas como base para a análise do estudo de caso brasileiro, SISAR. Os problemas de água e saneamento do Brasil foram classificados como ‘Wicked’, ou problemas de ação coletiva. Os ‘wicked problems’ resultaram de inúmeros vazios no setor, como os vazios regulatórios e de fiscalização e discutimos a ideia de parceria como um contra-argumento para vazios institucionais. As TPPs surgiram como uma solução potencial para lidar com ‘wicked problems’, pois apresentam características institucionais oriundas de diferentes esferas (públicas e privadas, lucrativas e sem fins lucrativos e governamentais e não-governamentais) e um conjunto de diferentes lógicas para a prestação de serviços e bens. Quando as organizações são expostas a diferentes lógicas, elas sofrem com tensões que podem se tornar desafios reais a serem enfrentados. Os diferentes formatos de concepções em parcerias foram traduzidos em tipos de configurações e cada tipo mostrou um modo diferente de se relacionar com a 'wickedness' dos problemas. Pelas configurações foi possível analisar a dinâmica entre os diferentes tipos de TPPs. As diferentes reações aos ‘wicked problems’ no mundo empírico são apresentadas neste estudo na forma de restrições institucionais que podem restringir ou possibilitar o surgimento das TPPs e influenciar sua governança. As configurações das TPPs podem ser tracionadas de acordo com a lógica dominante que expõe os diferentes equilíbrios de forças entre os setores. Essas forças foram desdobradas em dimensões que caracterizaram cada tipo de configuração. Realizamos uma pesquisa qualitativa e usamos dados de entrevistas semiestruturadas com pessoas envolvidas no setor de saneamento básico na Holanda, Gana, Quênia e Brasil, bem como fontes documentais. As lições aprendidas apontaram que a capacidade institucional é importante para experiências em parcerias, bem como o empoderamento da sociedade civil para uma participação mais efetiva. Quando os exemplos holandeses foram transpostos para o caso brasileiro, elementos inerentes ao contexto local e relacionados às restrições institucionais emergiram, o que mereceu ser discutido de uma forma mais profunda, sendo necessário articular esses elementos entre o nível Estado e o dos arranjos em parcerias, de forma a analisar como eles podem interferir em suas estruturas de governanças. As complementaridades institucionais observadas demonstraram que existem incompatibilidades no setor de água e esgoto com relação à pluralidade do sistema regulatório, a existência de duplicidade nos papéis dos atores, assim como contradições nas regras. Um aspecto relevante dos vazios institucionais diz respeito à falta de alinhamento do setor a nível federal no estabelecimento de um padrão de normas e diretrizes de referência para todas as agências reguladoras que operam no país. O modo centrado no Estado, com forte ênfase na relação entre os setores público e privado e a pouca valorização da sociedade civil foram as principais restrições institucionais identificados em termos de lógicas.porUniversidade PositivoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em AdministraçãoUPBrasilPós-GraduaçãoCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAOAdministrationSanitation - Ceará (Brazil : State)Combined sewer overflows - Ceará (Brazil : State)Tripartite organizational partnerships and the wickedness of the water and sanitation sector in Brazil: an institutional analysisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisGuarido Filho, Edson Ronaldohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2435628775717990Tulder, Rob vanhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9659815736637320Carvalho, Denise Moraesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sulinstname:Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (UNICSUL)instacron:UNICSULORIGINALDENISE MORAES CARVALHO.pdfDENISE MORAES CARVALHO.pdfTeseapplication/pdf5256334http://dev.siteworks.com.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2040/1/DENISE%20MORAES%20CARVALHO.pdf8a8c66bb0f34be508867413fc1c2e844MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://dev.siteworks.com.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2040/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52123456789/20402021-05-21 09:38:06.197oai:repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/oai/requestmary.pela@unicid.edu.bropendoar:2021-05-21T12:38:06Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul - Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (UNICSUL)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Tripartite organizational partnerships and the wickedness of the water and sanitation sector in Brazil: an institutional analysis |
title |
Tripartite organizational partnerships and the wickedness of the water and sanitation sector in Brazil: an institutional analysis |
spellingShingle |
Tripartite organizational partnerships and the wickedness of the water and sanitation sector in Brazil: an institutional analysis Carvalho, Denise Moraes CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO Administration Sanitation - Ceará (Brazil : State) Combined sewer overflows - Ceará (Brazil : State) |
title_short |
Tripartite organizational partnerships and the wickedness of the water and sanitation sector in Brazil: an institutional analysis |
title_full |
Tripartite organizational partnerships and the wickedness of the water and sanitation sector in Brazil: an institutional analysis |
title_fullStr |
Tripartite organizational partnerships and the wickedness of the water and sanitation sector in Brazil: an institutional analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tripartite organizational partnerships and the wickedness of the water and sanitation sector in Brazil: an institutional analysis |
title_sort |
Tripartite organizational partnerships and the wickedness of the water and sanitation sector in Brazil: an institutional analysis |
author |
Carvalho, Denise Moraes |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Denise Moraes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Guarido Filho, Edson Ronaldo |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2435628775717990 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Tulder, Rob van |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9659815736637320 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Denise Moraes |
contributor_str_mv |
Guarido Filho, Edson Ronaldo Tulder, Rob van |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO |
topic |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO Administration Sanitation - Ceará (Brazil : State) Combined sewer overflows - Ceará (Brazil : State) |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Administration Sanitation - Ceará (Brazil : State) Combined sewer overflows - Ceará (Brazil : State) |
description |
This study aims to investigate the institutional constraints on the water and sanitation sector in Brazil that can affect the governance of tripartite partnerships (TPPs) and compromise its viability. The analysis of the institutional constraints was expressed in terms of voids, complementarities and logics. State-level discussion shows that governments carry resilient elements of institutional constraints that make difficult to discuss agency, administrative structure and the relationship between the spheres of the government, as well as questions about the effectiveness of the existent rules and laws. By a progressive case study approach we analyzed two Dutch partnership case studies – in Ghana and in Kenya - and one Brazilian case study (SISAR/Ceará). The case studies were analyzed by the lens of configurations, through the combination of strengths of the typological and taxonomic approaches, using the Dutch partnerships as the basis for the analysis of the Brazilian case study, SISAR. The Brazilian water and sanitation problems were classified as ‘wicked’ or collective action problems. Wicked problems resulted of numerous voids in the sector, as the regulatory and enforcement voids and we discussed the idea of partnering as a counter-argument for institutional voids. The TPPs emerged as a potential solution for dealing with wicked problems as they present institutional characteristics from different spheres (public and private, profit and non-profit and governmental and non-governmental) and a bundle of different logics to the provision of services and goods. When organizations are exposed to different logics, they suffer from tensions that can become real challenges to be faced. The different formats of conceptions in partnerships were translated into configurations types and each type showed a different way of relating to the 'wickedness' of problems. By the configuration structure it was possible to analyze the dynamic between the different types of TPPs. The different reactions to wicked problems in the empirical world are presented in this study in the form of institutional constraints that can restrict or enable the emergence of the TPPs and influence their governance arrangements. The TPPs configurations can be pulled according to the dominant logic that expose the different balances of forces between sectors. These forces were unfolded in dimensions that characterized each type of configuration. The wickedness of the water and sanitation’s problems were possible to be empirically identified, with the help of configurations. We conducted a qualitative research and we used data from semi structured interviews with people involved on the basic sanitation sector in the Netherlands, Ghana, Kenya and Brazil, as well as documentary sources. The lessons learned, pointed that institutional capacity is important for experiences in partnerships as well as the empowerment of civil society for a more effective participation. When the Dutch examples were transposed to the Brazilian case, elements inherent to the local context and related to institutional constraints emerged, which deserved to be discussed in a deeper way, being necessary to articulate these elements between the state level and that of the arrangements in partnerships, in order to analyze how they can interfere in their governance structures. The institutional complementarities observed in this study have demonstrated that there are incompatibilities in the water and sanitation sectors regarding to the plurality of the regulatory system, the existence of duplicity in the actors’ roles, as well as contradictions in the rules. A relevant aspect of institutional voids concerns the lack of a sector’s macro-level alignment, at a federal level, to set a standard of reference norms and guidelines for all regulatory agencies operating in the country. The state-centered mode with strong emphasis on the relation between public and private sector, and the little appreciation of civil society were the main institutional constraints identified in terms of logics. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2019 2021-04-30T18:43:30Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-30T18:43:30Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/2040 |
url |
https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/2040 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Positivo |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Pós-Graduação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Positivo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul instname:Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (UNICSUL) instacron:UNICSUL |
instname_str |
Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (UNICSUL) |
instacron_str |
UNICSUL |
institution |
UNICSUL |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://dev.siteworks.com.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2040/1/DENISE%20MORAES%20CARVALHO.pdf http://dev.siteworks.com.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2040/2/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8a8c66bb0f34be508867413fc1c2e844 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul - Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul (UNICSUL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mary.pela@unicid.edu.br |
_version_ |
1801771145990504448 |