DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF AÇAÍ PALM (Euterpe oleracea MART.) INFLUENCE THE BROMELIADS DIVERSITY IN A FLOODPLAIN FOREST?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biota Amazônia |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/701 |
Resumo: | We evaluated the diversity of epiphytic bromeliads in a managed and unmanaged area of açaí palm (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) in the Environmental Protection Area of Island Combu, Belém, Pará. Two plots of 1 ha each were demarcated and subdivided into four plots of 50 x 50 m, we registered all bromeliads with the aid of binoculars and free climbing. To identify the species we used identification keys, specialized literature and comparison with herbarium specimens. We verified the vertical distribution and calculated the epiphytic importance value, the diversity indexes of Shannon (H’) and the inverse of Simpson (1/D) and the similarity indexes of Sorensem and Jaccard. In the area of managed açaí palms were registered 1,012 individuals, in four genera and seven species, in the unmanaged area were recorded 399 individuals, into four genera and six species. Guzmania lingulata and Vriesea amazonica had a greater number of individuals and epiphytic highest importance value in both areas. The diversity in the managed area was H’=0.44 and 1/D=2.4 and the estimated species number was about 9. The unmanaged area presented H’=0.39 and 1/D=1.8 and the estimated species number was close to 8. We conclude that the traditional management of the açaí palm did not influenced the diversity of epiphytic bromeliads.Keywords: ecological association; traditional management; Amazon estuary. |
id |
UNIFAP-3_86cd99c3b5292e13a8462fff0781a369 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/701 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFAP-3 |
network_name_str |
Biota Amazônia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF AÇAÍ PALM (Euterpe oleracea MART.) INFLUENCE THE BROMELIADS DIVERSITY IN A FLOODPLAIN FOREST?O MANEJO DO AÇAIZEIRO, Euterpe oleracea Mart., INFLUENCIA A DIVERSIDADE DE BROMÉLIAS EPÍFITAS EM FLORESTA DE VÁRZEA?We evaluated the diversity of epiphytic bromeliads in a managed and unmanaged area of açaí palm (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) in the Environmental Protection Area of Island Combu, Belém, Pará. Two plots of 1 ha each were demarcated and subdivided into four plots of 50 x 50 m, we registered all bromeliads with the aid of binoculars and free climbing. To identify the species we used identification keys, specialized literature and comparison with herbarium specimens. We verified the vertical distribution and calculated the epiphytic importance value, the diversity indexes of Shannon (H’) and the inverse of Simpson (1/D) and the similarity indexes of Sorensem and Jaccard. In the area of managed açaí palms were registered 1,012 individuals, in four genera and seven species, in the unmanaged area were recorded 399 individuals, into four genera and six species. Guzmania lingulata and Vriesea amazonica had a greater number of individuals and epiphytic highest importance value in both areas. The diversity in the managed area was H’=0.44 and 1/D=2.4 and the estimated species number was about 9. The unmanaged area presented H’=0.39 and 1/D=1.8 and the estimated species number was close to 8. We conclude that the traditional management of the açaí palm did not influenced the diversity of epiphytic bromeliads.Keywords: ecological association; traditional management; Amazon estuary.Foi avaliada a diversidade de bromélias epÃfitas em área manejada e não manejada de açaizais (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) na Ãrea de Proteção Ambiental, Ilha do Combu, Belém, Pará. Foram demarcadas duas parcelas de 1 ha cada subdivididas em quatro subparcelas de 50 x 50 m, onde registraram-se todas as bromélias com auxÃlio de binóculo e escaladas livres. Estas foram identificadas por chaves dicotômicas, por literatura especializada e por comparação com exemplares de herbário. Foi verificada a distribuição vertical, e calculados o valor de importância epifÃtico, os Ãndices de diversidade de Shannon (Hâ) e o inverso de Simpson (1/D) e os Ãndices de similaridade de Sorensem e Jaccard. Na área de açaizal manejado foram registrados 1.012 indivÃduos, distribuÃdos em quatro gêneros e sete espécies; na área de açaizal não manejado foram 399 indivÃduos, alocados em quatro gêneros e seis espécies. Guzmania lingulata (L.) Mez e Vriesea amazonica (Baker) Mez apresentaram maior número de indivÃduos e maior valor de importância epifÃtico nas duas áreas. A diversidade na área manejada foi de Hâ=0.44 e 1/D=2.4 e o número de espécies estimadas foi de cerca de 9. A área não manejada apresentou Hâ=0.39 e 1/D=1.8 e o número estimado de espécies foi de aproximadamente 8. O manejo tradicional do açaizeiro não influenciou a diversidade de bromélias epÃfitas.Palavras-chave: associação ecológica, manejo tradicional, estuário amazônico. Universidade Federal do AmapáCNPqQuaresma, Adriano CostaJardim, Mário Augusto Gonçalves2013-10-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/70110.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v3n2p94-100Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota); v. 3, n. 2 (2013); 94-1002179-5746reponame:Biota Amazôniainstname:Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)instacron:UNIFAPporhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/701/v3n2p94-100.pdfAmazônia; Pará, BrasilAtualFitossociologia; FlorísticaDireitos autorais 2013 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-04-14T18:16:55Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/701Revistahttp://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biotaONGhttps://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/oai||juliosa@unifap.br2179-57462179-5746opendoar:2016-04-14T18:16:55Biota Amazônia - Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF AÇAÍ PALM (Euterpe oleracea MART.) INFLUENCE THE BROMELIADS DIVERSITY IN A FLOODPLAIN FOREST? O MANEJO DO AÇAIZEIRO, Euterpe oleracea Mart., INFLUENCIA A DIVERSIDADE DE BROMÉLIAS EPÍFITAS EM FLORESTA DE VÁRZEA? |
title |
DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF AÇAÍ PALM (Euterpe oleracea MART.) INFLUENCE THE BROMELIADS DIVERSITY IN A FLOODPLAIN FOREST? |
spellingShingle |
DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF AÇAÍ PALM (Euterpe oleracea MART.) INFLUENCE THE BROMELIADS DIVERSITY IN A FLOODPLAIN FOREST? Quaresma, Adriano Costa |
title_short |
DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF AÇAÍ PALM (Euterpe oleracea MART.) INFLUENCE THE BROMELIADS DIVERSITY IN A FLOODPLAIN FOREST? |
title_full |
DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF AÇAÍ PALM (Euterpe oleracea MART.) INFLUENCE THE BROMELIADS DIVERSITY IN A FLOODPLAIN FOREST? |
title_fullStr |
DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF AÇAÍ PALM (Euterpe oleracea MART.) INFLUENCE THE BROMELIADS DIVERSITY IN A FLOODPLAIN FOREST? |
title_full_unstemmed |
DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF AÇAÍ PALM (Euterpe oleracea MART.) INFLUENCE THE BROMELIADS DIVERSITY IN A FLOODPLAIN FOREST? |
title_sort |
DOES THE MANAGEMENT OF AÇAÍ PALM (Euterpe oleracea MART.) INFLUENCE THE BROMELIADS DIVERSITY IN A FLOODPLAIN FOREST? |
author |
Quaresma, Adriano Costa |
author_facet |
Quaresma, Adriano Costa Jardim, Mário Augusto Gonçalves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jardim, Mário Augusto Gonçalves |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
CNPq |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Quaresma, Adriano Costa Jardim, Mário Augusto Gonçalves |
description |
We evaluated the diversity of epiphytic bromeliads in a managed and unmanaged area of açaí palm (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) in the Environmental Protection Area of Island Combu, Belém, Pará. Two plots of 1 ha each were demarcated and subdivided into four plots of 50 x 50 m, we registered all bromeliads with the aid of binoculars and free climbing. To identify the species we used identification keys, specialized literature and comparison with herbarium specimens. We verified the vertical distribution and calculated the epiphytic importance value, the diversity indexes of Shannon (H’) and the inverse of Simpson (1/D) and the similarity indexes of Sorensem and Jaccard. In the area of managed açaí palms were registered 1,012 individuals, in four genera and seven species, in the unmanaged area were recorded 399 individuals, into four genera and six species. Guzmania lingulata and Vriesea amazonica had a greater number of individuals and epiphytic highest importance value in both areas. The diversity in the managed area was H’=0.44 and 1/D=2.4 and the estimated species number was about 9. The unmanaged area presented H’=0.39 and 1/D=1.8 and the estimated species number was close to 8. We conclude that the traditional management of the açaí palm did not influenced the diversity of epiphytic bromeliads.Keywords: ecological association; traditional management; Amazon estuary. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-10-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/701 10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v3n2p94-100 |
url |
https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/701 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18561/2179-5746/biotaamazonia.v3n2p94-100 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/biota/article/view/701/v3n2p94-100.pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2013 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2013 Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Amazônia; Pará, Brasil Atual Fitossociologia; Florística |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Amapá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Amapá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Biota Amazônia (Biote Amazonie, Biota Amazonia, Amazonian Biota); v. 3, n. 2 (2013); 94-100 2179-5746 reponame:Biota Amazônia instname:Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP) instacron:UNIFAP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFAP |
institution |
UNIFAP |
reponame_str |
Biota Amazônia |
collection |
Biota Amazônia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biota Amazônia - Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||juliosa@unifap.br |
_version_ |
1800218368929693696 |