Production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seedlings under different substrates
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12867 |
Resumo: | The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of different substrates on the production of seedlings of basil (Ocimum basicilicum L.). The experimental design was completely randomized, with five types of substrates (Carolina®, Provaso®, Provaso® + Coconut fiber, Coconut fiber + Peat and Coconut fiber), being studied in two cultivars, Basilicão (BS) and Grecco a Palla (GP), with four replications. The evaluations were carried out from the fifth day after the emergency. The emergency speed index (IVE) and emergency percentage (E%) were calculated. The final evaluation was at 30 days after sowing (DAS), being analyzed the following variables: neck diameter (cm), plant height (cm), root length (cm), dry mass of the aerial part (g), dry root mass (g), number of leaves, leaf area (cm²) and quality index ofDickson (IQD). It was observed that, for the two BS and GP cultivars, the Carolina® substrate was the one that provided the highest percentage of emergence, as well as the lowest mean time of emergence. For height, stem diameter, number of leaves and leaf area, it was observed in both cultivars that the substrates, Coco fiber® and Coco fiber + Peat, were smaller. For root length, coconut fiber was superior for BS and coconut fiber + peat for GP. Taking into account all the morphological characteristics analyzed, in cv. BS Provaso® and Coconut fiber were the best for cv. GP was the coconut fiber + peat. |
id |
UNIFEI_dcfc0aa207d51e133615cbb10b6d5b8f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12867 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seedlings under different substratesProducción de plántulas de albahaca (Ocimum basilicum L.) bajo diferentes sustratosProdução de mudas de manjericão (Ocimum basilicum L.) sob efeito de diferentes substratos EmergênciaQualidade de mudaOcimum basilicum.EmergênciaCalidad de la plântulaOcimum basilicum.EmergenceSeedling qualityOcimum basilicum.The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of different substrates on the production of seedlings of basil (Ocimum basicilicum L.). The experimental design was completely randomized, with five types of substrates (Carolina®, Provaso®, Provaso® + Coconut fiber, Coconut fiber + Peat and Coconut fiber), being studied in two cultivars, Basilicão (BS) and Grecco a Palla (GP), with four replications. The evaluations were carried out from the fifth day after the emergency. The emergency speed index (IVE) and emergency percentage (E%) were calculated. The final evaluation was at 30 days after sowing (DAS), being analyzed the following variables: neck diameter (cm), plant height (cm), root length (cm), dry mass of the aerial part (g), dry root mass (g), number of leaves, leaf area (cm²) and quality index ofDickson (IQD). It was observed that, for the two BS and GP cultivars, the Carolina® substrate was the one that provided the highest percentage of emergence, as well as the lowest mean time of emergence. For height, stem diameter, number of leaves and leaf area, it was observed in both cultivars that the substrates, Coco fiber® and Coco fiber + Peat, were smaller. For root length, coconut fiber was superior for BS and coconut fiber + peat for GP. Taking into account all the morphological characteristics analyzed, in cv. BS Provaso® and Coconut fiber were the best for cv. GP was the coconut fiber + peat.El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar los efectos de diferentes sustratos en la producción de plántulas de albahaca (Ocimum basicilicum L.). El diseño experimental fue completamente al azar, con cinco tipos de sustratos (Carolina®, Provaso®, Provaso® + fibra de coco, fibra de coco + fibra de turba y coco), en estudio en dos cultivares, Basilicão (BS) y Grecco a Palla (GP), con cuatro repeticiones.Las evaluaciones se realizaron a partir del quinto día posterior a la emergencia. Se calculó el índice de velocidad de emergencia (IVE) y el porcentaje de emergencia (E%). La evaluación final fue a los 30 días después de la siembra (DAS), analizándose las siguientes variables: diámetro del cuello (cm), altura de la planta (cm), largo de la raíz (cm), masa seca de la parte aérea (g), masa seca de la raíz. (g), número de hojas, área foliar (cm²) e índice de calidad deDickson (IQD). Se observó que, para los dos cultivares BS y GP, el sustrato Carolina® fue el que proporcionó el mayor porcentaje de emergencia, así como el menor tiempo medio de emergencia. Para altura, diámetro de tallo, número de hojas y área foliar, se observó en ambos cultivares que los sustratos, fibra de coco® y fibra de coco + turba, fueron menores. Para la longitud de la raíz, la fibra de coco fue superior para BS y fibra de coco + turba para GP. Teniendo en cuenta todas las características morfológicas analizadas, en el cv. BS Provaso® y la fibra de coco fueron los mejores para el cv. GP fue la fibra de coco + turba.O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar os efeitos de diferentes substratos na produção de mudas de cultivares de manjericão (Ocimum basicilicum L.). O delineamento experimental foi o inteiramente casualizado, com cinco tipos de substratos (Carolina®, Provaso®, Provaso® + Fibra de coco, Fibra de coco + Turfa e Fibra de coco), sendo estudado em duas cultivares, Basilicão (BS) e Grecco a Palla (GP), com quatro repetições. As avaliações foram realizadas a partir do quinto dia após a emergência. Foi calculado o índice de velocidade de emergência (IVE) e percentual de emergência (E%). A avaliação final foi aos 30 dias após a semeadura (DAS), sendo analisadas as seguintes variáveis: diâmetro do colo (cm), altura da planta (cm), comprimento de raiz (cm), massa seca da parte aérea (g), massa seca de raízes (g), número de folhas, área foliar (cm²) e índice de qualidade de Dickson (IQD). Observou-se que para as duas cultivares BS e GP o substrato Carolina® foi o que proporcionou maior porcentagem de emergência, assim como o menor tempo médio de emergência. Para altura, diâmetro do coleto, número de folhas e área foliar, observou-se, nas duas cultivares, que os substratos, Fibra de coco® e Fibra de coco + Turfa foram menores. Para comprimento de raiz, Fibra de coco foi superior para BS e Fibra de coco + turfa para GP. Levando em consideração todas as características morfológicas analisadas, na cv. BS o Provaso® e Fibra de coco foram os melhores; para a cv. GP foi o Fibra de coco + turfa.Research, Society and Development2021-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1286710.33448/rsd-v10i2.12867Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 2; e58210212867Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 2; e58210212867Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 2; e582102128672525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12867/11628Copyright (c) 2021 Thatiane Nepomuceno Alves; Beatriz Lívero Carvalho; Politon Thiago Pereira Guedes; Nicholas Taborda Nordi; Eduardo Santana Aires; Marcelo Munhoz Venâncio de Oliveira; Elizabeth Orika Ono; João Domingos Rodrigueshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Thatiane Nepomuceno Carvalho, Beatriz Lívero Guedes, Politon Thiago Pereira Nordi, Nicholas Taborda Aires, Eduardo Santana Oliveira, Marcelo Munhoz Venâncio de Ono, Elizabeth Orika Rodrigues, João Domingos 2021-03-02T09:32:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/12867Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:34:20.294694Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seedlings under different substrates Producción de plántulas de albahaca (Ocimum basilicum L.) bajo diferentes sustratos Produção de mudas de manjericão (Ocimum basilicum L.) sob efeito de diferentes substratos |
title |
Production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seedlings under different substrates |
spellingShingle |
Production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seedlings under different substrates Alves, Thatiane Nepomuceno Emergência Qualidade de muda Ocimum basilicum. Emergência Calidad de la plântula Ocimum basilicum. Emergence Seedling quality Ocimum basilicum. |
title_short |
Production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seedlings under different substrates |
title_full |
Production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seedlings under different substrates |
title_fullStr |
Production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seedlings under different substrates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seedlings under different substrates |
title_sort |
Production of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seedlings under different substrates |
author |
Alves, Thatiane Nepomuceno |
author_facet |
Alves, Thatiane Nepomuceno Carvalho, Beatriz Lívero Guedes, Politon Thiago Pereira Nordi, Nicholas Taborda Aires, Eduardo Santana Oliveira, Marcelo Munhoz Venâncio de Ono, Elizabeth Orika Rodrigues, João Domingos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carvalho, Beatriz Lívero Guedes, Politon Thiago Pereira Nordi, Nicholas Taborda Aires, Eduardo Santana Oliveira, Marcelo Munhoz Venâncio de Ono, Elizabeth Orika Rodrigues, João Domingos |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, Thatiane Nepomuceno Carvalho, Beatriz Lívero Guedes, Politon Thiago Pereira Nordi, Nicholas Taborda Aires, Eduardo Santana Oliveira, Marcelo Munhoz Venâncio de Ono, Elizabeth Orika Rodrigues, João Domingos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Emergência Qualidade de muda Ocimum basilicum. Emergência Calidad de la plântula Ocimum basilicum. Emergence Seedling quality Ocimum basilicum. |
topic |
Emergência Qualidade de muda Ocimum basilicum. Emergência Calidad de la plântula Ocimum basilicum. Emergence Seedling quality Ocimum basilicum. |
description |
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of different substrates on the production of seedlings of basil (Ocimum basicilicum L.). The experimental design was completely randomized, with five types of substrates (Carolina®, Provaso®, Provaso® + Coconut fiber, Coconut fiber + Peat and Coconut fiber), being studied in two cultivars, Basilicão (BS) and Grecco a Palla (GP), with four replications. The evaluations were carried out from the fifth day after the emergency. The emergency speed index (IVE) and emergency percentage (E%) were calculated. The final evaluation was at 30 days after sowing (DAS), being analyzed the following variables: neck diameter (cm), plant height (cm), root length (cm), dry mass of the aerial part (g), dry root mass (g), number of leaves, leaf area (cm²) and quality index ofDickson (IQD). It was observed that, for the two BS and GP cultivars, the Carolina® substrate was the one that provided the highest percentage of emergence, as well as the lowest mean time of emergence. For height, stem diameter, number of leaves and leaf area, it was observed in both cultivars that the substrates, Coco fiber® and Coco fiber + Peat, were smaller. For root length, coconut fiber was superior for BS and coconut fiber + peat for GP. Taking into account all the morphological characteristics analyzed, in cv. BS Provaso® and Coconut fiber were the best for cv. GP was the coconut fiber + peat. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12867 10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12867 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12867 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i2.12867 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/12867/11628 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 2; e58210212867 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 2; e58210212867 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 2; e58210212867 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052746225942528 |