Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29169 |
Resumo: | This article analyzed the interference of public opinion when an administrative or judicial decision is made, within the scope of Brazilian criminal prosecution. We used case studies as a strategy, collecting data through documentary research. Three cases with great media repercussion were selected and analyzed, being: TJSP Case No. 0002554-94.2003.8.26.0100, called Caso Escola de Base; TJSC Case - No. 0000568-40.2019.8.24.0023, named as Case Elian Lucas Ferreira Dias; and TJRJ Process – no. 0012515-98.2019.8.19.0001, referred to as Leonardo do Nascimento dos Santos Case. To analyze the cases, the legal bases concerning each one was exposed, based on the legislation, doctrine, and Brazilian jurisprudence. The results allow us to conclude that the procedural decision-making of both cases analyzed was marked by the external influence arising from the public opinion generated and fostered by the Mass Media, which had an impact on the criminal prosecution of the cases. It is concluded that the media does not only influence the population in general once that media agencies end up interfering in the achievement of exclusive State activities. |
id |
UNIFEI_11ea82eb0d3d4831bc68f3843145a83b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29169 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution systemDiscusión mediática y opinión pública: reflexiones en el sistema brasileño de persecución criminalDiscussão midiática e a opinião pública: reflexos no sistema de persecução penal BrasileiroPersecución CriminalLibertad de expresiónOpinión públicaMediaEnseñanza.Persecução PenalLiberdade de expressãoMídiaOpinião PúblicaEnsino.Criminal PersecutionFreedom of speechMediaPublic opinionTeaching.This article analyzed the interference of public opinion when an administrative or judicial decision is made, within the scope of Brazilian criminal prosecution. We used case studies as a strategy, collecting data through documentary research. Three cases with great media repercussion were selected and analyzed, being: TJSP Case No. 0002554-94.2003.8.26.0100, called Caso Escola de Base; TJSC Case - No. 0000568-40.2019.8.24.0023, named as Case Elian Lucas Ferreira Dias; and TJRJ Process – no. 0012515-98.2019.8.19.0001, referred to as Leonardo do Nascimento dos Santos Case. To analyze the cases, the legal bases concerning each one was exposed, based on the legislation, doctrine, and Brazilian jurisprudence. The results allow us to conclude that the procedural decision-making of both cases analyzed was marked by the external influence arising from the public opinion generated and fostered by the Mass Media, which had an impact on the criminal prosecution of the cases. It is concluded that the media does not only influence the population in general once that media agencies end up interfering in the achievement of exclusive State activities.Este artículo analizó la injerencia de la opinión pública cuando se toma una decisión administrativa o judicial, en el ámbito de la persecución penal brasileña. Utilizamos como estrategia el estudio de casos, recolectando datos a través de la investigación documental. Se seleccionaron y analizaron tres juicios de gran repercusión mediática, así: Caso TJSP N° 0002554-94.2003.8.26.0100, denominado Caso Escola de Base; Caso TJSC - No. 0000568-40.2019.8.24.0023, denominado Caso Elian Lucas Ferreira Dias; y Proceso TJRJ – nº 0012515-98.2019.8.19.0001, denominado Caso Leonardo do Nascimento dos Santos. Para el análisis de los casos, se expusieron los fundamentos jurídicos de cada uno de ellos, basados en la legislación, la doctrina y la jurisprudencia brasileña. Los resultados permiten concluir que la toma de decisiones procesales de ambos os casos estuvo marcada por la influencia externa proveniente de la opinión pública generada y fomentada por los Medios de Comunicación, lo que repercutió en la persecución penal de los casos. Se concluye que los medios de comunicación no solo influyen en la población en general, sino que las agencias de medios terminan interfiriendo en la realización de actividades exclusivas del Estado.O artigo analisou a interferência da discussão midiática e da opinião pública quando da prolação de uma decisão administrativa ou judicial, no âmbito da persecução penal brasileira. Foi utilizada como estratégia de pesquisa estudos de caso, sendo as informações levantadas por meio de pesquisa documental. Três processos judiciais de grande repercussão midiática foram selecionados e analisados, sendo: Processo TJSP n.º 0002554-94.2003.8.26.0100, denominado Caso Escola Base; Processo TJSC – n.º 0000568-40.2019.8.24.0023, nominado como Caso Elian Lucas Ferreira Dias; e Processo TJRJ – n.º 0012515-98.2019.8.19.0001, referido como Caso Leonardo do Nascimento dos Santos. Para analisar os casos, foram expostas as bases jurídicas concernentes a cada um deles, pautando-se na legislação, doutrina e jurisprudência pátria. Os resultados permitem concluir que os atos processuais decisórios dos casos foram marcados pela influência externa advinda da opinião pública gerada e fomentada pelos Mass Media, tendo impactado na persecução criminal dos casos. Conclui-se que a mídia não influencia apenas a população em geral, e sim, agências midiáticas acabam por interferir na consecução de atividades exclusivas de Estado.Research, Society and Development2022-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2916910.33448/rsd-v11i6.29169Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 6; e35211629169Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 6; e35211629169Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 6; e352116291692525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29169/25285Copyright (c) 2022 Marcelo Ricardo Colaço; Ivanete Schneider Hahnhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColaço, Marcelo RicardoHahn, Ivanete Schneider 2022-05-13T18:04:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29169Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:46:19.185005Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system Discusión mediática y opinión pública: reflexiones en el sistema brasileño de persecución criminal Discussão midiática e a opinião pública: reflexos no sistema de persecução penal Brasileiro |
title |
Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system |
spellingShingle |
Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system Colaço, Marcelo Ricardo Persecución Criminal Libertad de expresión Opinión pública Media Enseñanza. Persecução Penal Liberdade de expressão Mídia Opinião Pública Ensino. Criminal Persecution Freedom of speech Media Public opinion Teaching. |
title_short |
Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system |
title_full |
Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system |
title_fullStr |
Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system |
title_sort |
Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system |
author |
Colaço, Marcelo Ricardo |
author_facet |
Colaço, Marcelo Ricardo Hahn, Ivanete Schneider |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hahn, Ivanete Schneider |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Colaço, Marcelo Ricardo Hahn, Ivanete Schneider |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Persecución Criminal Libertad de expresión Opinión pública Media Enseñanza. Persecução Penal Liberdade de expressão Mídia Opinião Pública Ensino. Criminal Persecution Freedom of speech Media Public opinion Teaching. |
topic |
Persecución Criminal Libertad de expresión Opinión pública Media Enseñanza. Persecução Penal Liberdade de expressão Mídia Opinião Pública Ensino. Criminal Persecution Freedom of speech Media Public opinion Teaching. |
description |
This article analyzed the interference of public opinion when an administrative or judicial decision is made, within the scope of Brazilian criminal prosecution. We used case studies as a strategy, collecting data through documentary research. Three cases with great media repercussion were selected and analyzed, being: TJSP Case No. 0002554-94.2003.8.26.0100, called Caso Escola de Base; TJSC Case - No. 0000568-40.2019.8.24.0023, named as Case Elian Lucas Ferreira Dias; and TJRJ Process – no. 0012515-98.2019.8.19.0001, referred to as Leonardo do Nascimento dos Santos Case. To analyze the cases, the legal bases concerning each one was exposed, based on the legislation, doctrine, and Brazilian jurisprudence. The results allow us to conclude that the procedural decision-making of both cases analyzed was marked by the external influence arising from the public opinion generated and fostered by the Mass Media, which had an impact on the criminal prosecution of the cases. It is concluded that the media does not only influence the population in general once that media agencies end up interfering in the achievement of exclusive State activities. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29169 10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29169 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29169 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29169 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29169/25285 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Marcelo Ricardo Colaço; Ivanete Schneider Hahn https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Marcelo Ricardo Colaço; Ivanete Schneider Hahn https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 6; e35211629169 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 6; e35211629169 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 6; e35211629169 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052711444676608 |