Impact of papilloscopic expert reports at crime sites on court decisions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3658 |
Resumo: | This article proposes to verify the impact that the Papilloscopic Examination Reports of crime places, issued by the Papilloscopists of the Federal Police, produce or not in the respective decisions in the judicial processes. This is a quantitative and qualitative study, based on a census of papilloscopic crime scene reports produced from 2013 to 2016 in the Federal Police Superintendency in Belém-PA. The results showed that these technical documents had an impact in order to convince the Attorneys of the Republic and the Federal Judges that the individual indicated by this report, in fact, represents the perpetrator of the crime. As a consequence, the manifestations of the members of the Public Prosecutor's Office in favor of preventive detention are based on the individual described in the reports of papilloscopic expertise, as well as the complaints offered to the Justice. In the same way, the Federal Judges, in the judicial processes concerning these reports, decreed preventive detention and even condemned, in a judicial sentence, the persons indicated by these technical documents, confirming the repercussion of the reports in the judicial decisions. |
id |
UNIFEI_3412e916154d333c56d3a98f0ec01297 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3658 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Impact of papilloscopic expert reports at crime sites on court decisionsImpacto de los informes de expertos papiloscópico en los sitios delictivos sobre las decisiones judicialesImpacto dos laudos de perícia papiloscópica em locais de crime nas decisões judiciaisExamFingerprintJudiciaryInterferenceReport.ExameImpressão digitalJudiciárioInterferênciaLaudo.ExamenHuella digitalPoder judicialInterferenciaInforme.This article proposes to verify the impact that the Papilloscopic Examination Reports of crime places, issued by the Papilloscopists of the Federal Police, produce or not in the respective decisions in the judicial processes. This is a quantitative and qualitative study, based on a census of papilloscopic crime scene reports produced from 2013 to 2016 in the Federal Police Superintendency in Belém-PA. The results showed that these technical documents had an impact in order to convince the Attorneys of the Republic and the Federal Judges that the individual indicated by this report, in fact, represents the perpetrator of the crime. As a consequence, the manifestations of the members of the Public Prosecutor's Office in favor of preventive detention are based on the individual described in the reports of papilloscopic expertise, as well as the complaints offered to the Justice. In the same way, the Federal Judges, in the judicial processes concerning these reports, decreed preventive detention and even condemned, in a judicial sentence, the persons indicated by these technical documents, confirming the repercussion of the reports in the judicial decisions.Este artículo tiene la intención de verificar el impacto que los Informes de Exameness Papilloscópicos de lugares delictivos, emitidos por los Papilloscopistas de la Policía Federal, producen o no en las decisiones respectivas en los procesos judiciales. Este es un estudio cuantitativo y cualitativo, basado en un censo de informes papilloscópicos de la escena del crimen producidos entre 2013 y 2016 en la Superintendencia de la Policía Federal en Belém-PA. Los resultados mostraron que estos documentos técnicos tuvieron un impacto para convencer a los fiscales y a los jueces federales de que la persona indicada en este informe, de hecho, representa al autor del delito. Como consecuencia, las manifestaciones de los miembros de la Fiscalía a favor de la detención preventiva se basan en la persona descrita en los informes de pericia papiloscópica, así como en las denuncias ofrecidas a la Justicia. Del mismo modo, los Jueces Federales, en los procesos judiciales relacionados con estos informes, decretaron la detención preventiva e incluso condenaron, en una sentencia judicial, a las personas indicadas en estos documentos técnicos, confirmando la repercusión de los informes en las decisiones judiciales.O presente artigo se propõe a verificar o impacto que os Laudos de Perícias Papiloscópicas de locais de crime, emitidos pelos Papiloscopistas da Polícia Federal, produzem ou não nas respectivas decisões nos processos judiciais. Trata-se de um estudo quanti-qualitativo, a partir de um censo dos laudos papiloscópicos de local de crime produzidos de 2013 a 2016 na circunscrição da Superintendência da Polícia Federal em Belém-PA. Os resultados demonstraram que esses documentos técnicos impactaram de forma a convencer os Procuradores da República e os Juízes Federais de que o indivíduo indicado por esse laudo, de fato, representa o autor do crime. Como consequência, as manifestações dos membros do Ministério Público favoráveis à prisão preventiva tomaram por base o indivíduo descrito nos laudos de perícia papiloscópica, assim como as denúncias oferecidas à Justiça. Da mesma forma os Juízes Federais, nos processos judiciais concernentes a esses laudos decretaram a prisão preventiva e até condenaram, em sentença judicial, as pessoas indicadas por estes documentos técnicos, confirmando a repercussão dos laudos nas decisões judiciais.Research, Society and Development2020-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/365810.33448/rsd-v9i7.3658Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 7; e110973658Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 7; e110973658Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 7; e1109736582525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3658/2918Copyright (c) 2020 Luiz Augusto Mota Nunes Carvalhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Luiz Augusto Mota Nunes deAlmeida, Silvia dos Santos2020-08-20T18:05:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/3658Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:27:47.150275Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of papilloscopic expert reports at crime sites on court decisions Impacto de los informes de expertos papiloscópico en los sitios delictivos sobre las decisiones judiciales Impacto dos laudos de perícia papiloscópica em locais de crime nas decisões judiciais |
title |
Impact of papilloscopic expert reports at crime sites on court decisions |
spellingShingle |
Impact of papilloscopic expert reports at crime sites on court decisions Carvalho, Luiz Augusto Mota Nunes de Exam Fingerprint Judiciary Interference Report. Exame Impressão digital Judiciário Interferência Laudo. Examen Huella digital Poder judicial Interferencia Informe. |
title_short |
Impact of papilloscopic expert reports at crime sites on court decisions |
title_full |
Impact of papilloscopic expert reports at crime sites on court decisions |
title_fullStr |
Impact of papilloscopic expert reports at crime sites on court decisions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of papilloscopic expert reports at crime sites on court decisions |
title_sort |
Impact of papilloscopic expert reports at crime sites on court decisions |
author |
Carvalho, Luiz Augusto Mota Nunes de |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Luiz Augusto Mota Nunes de Almeida, Silvia dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida, Silvia dos Santos |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Luiz Augusto Mota Nunes de Almeida, Silvia dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Exam Fingerprint Judiciary Interference Report. Exame Impressão digital Judiciário Interferência Laudo. Examen Huella digital Poder judicial Interferencia Informe. |
topic |
Exam Fingerprint Judiciary Interference Report. Exame Impressão digital Judiciário Interferência Laudo. Examen Huella digital Poder judicial Interferencia Informe. |
description |
This article proposes to verify the impact that the Papilloscopic Examination Reports of crime places, issued by the Papilloscopists of the Federal Police, produce or not in the respective decisions in the judicial processes. This is a quantitative and qualitative study, based on a census of papilloscopic crime scene reports produced from 2013 to 2016 in the Federal Police Superintendency in Belém-PA. The results showed that these technical documents had an impact in order to convince the Attorneys of the Republic and the Federal Judges that the individual indicated by this report, in fact, represents the perpetrator of the crime. As a consequence, the manifestations of the members of the Public Prosecutor's Office in favor of preventive detention are based on the individual described in the reports of papilloscopic expertise, as well as the complaints offered to the Justice. In the same way, the Federal Judges, in the judicial processes concerning these reports, decreed preventive detention and even condemned, in a judicial sentence, the persons indicated by these technical documents, confirming the repercussion of the reports in the judicial decisions. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3658 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3658 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3658 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3658 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3658/2918 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Luiz Augusto Mota Nunes Carvalho info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Luiz Augusto Mota Nunes Carvalho |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 7; e110973658 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 7; e110973658 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 7; e110973658 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052735444484096 |