Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21900 |
Resumo: | Instrumentation is a fundamental step in endodontic treatment to promote proper cleaning and shaping of the canal. The objective of this study was to compare the cutting capacity of two reciprocal nickel-titanium systems in simulated canal blocks. Sixty acrylic blocks were used, divided into two groups of reciprocal files (WaveOne Gold - WOG and W-File - WF), each with 30 blocks and divided into 3 groups (n=10) representing the first, second and third uses: WOG1, WOG2, WOG3, WF1, WF2, and WF3, respectively. Ink was injected into the simulated channels, which were covered with laminated paper to avoid affecting the instrumentation. For irrigation, 5mL of saline was used at each instrument change. At the end of instrumentation, the blocks were photographed and analyzed in a computer program to compare the results before and after instrumentation. In the statistical analysis, the tests S Shapiro-Wilk, T for independent samples and Mann Whitney were performed. Under the experimental conditions in which this study was conducted, it is concluded that there were no significant differences in apical transport after the third application. However, the instruments of the W-File group had more conservative preparations with a better centralization capacity compared to the instruments of the WaveOne Gold group, which caused preparations with a larger diameter. |
id |
UNIFEI_3827adcb0bddafda7d488c847c7538bb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21900 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file)Evaluación de la capacidad de corte de dos instrumentos alternativos después del tercer uso (Wa-veOne Gold y W-file)Avaliação da capacidade de corte de dois instrumentos reciprocantes após terceiro uso (WaveOne Gold e W-file)EndodonticsSimulated canalsWaveOne GoldW-File.Canais simuladosEndodontiaWaveOne GoldW-File.Canales simuladosEndodonciaWaveOne GoldW-file.Instrumentation is a fundamental step in endodontic treatment to promote proper cleaning and shaping of the canal. The objective of this study was to compare the cutting capacity of two reciprocal nickel-titanium systems in simulated canal blocks. Sixty acrylic blocks were used, divided into two groups of reciprocal files (WaveOne Gold - WOG and W-File - WF), each with 30 blocks and divided into 3 groups (n=10) representing the first, second and third uses: WOG1, WOG2, WOG3, WF1, WF2, and WF3, respectively. Ink was injected into the simulated channels, which were covered with laminated paper to avoid affecting the instrumentation. For irrigation, 5mL of saline was used at each instrument change. At the end of instrumentation, the blocks were photographed and analyzed in a computer program to compare the results before and after instrumentation. In the statistical analysis, the tests S Shapiro-Wilk, T for independent samples and Mann Whitney were performed. Under the experimental conditions in which this study was conducted, it is concluded that there were no significant differences in apical transport after the third application. However, the instruments of the W-File group had more conservative preparations with a better centralization capacity compared to the instruments of the WaveOne Gold group, which caused preparations with a larger diameter.La instrumentación es un paso fundamental en el tratamiento de endodoncia para promover la limpieza y el modelado adecuados del conducto. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la capacidad de corte de dos sistemas alternativos de níquel-titanio en bloques de canales simulados. Se utilizaron sesenta bloques acrílicos, que se separaron en dos grupos de limas recíprocas (WaveOne Gold - WOG y W-File - WF) con 30 bloques cada uno, y subdivididos en 3 grupos (n = 10), representando el primero, segundo y tercero. uso: WOG1, WOG2, WOG3, WF1, WF2 y WF3. Se inyectó tinta tinta en los canales simulados, que se cubrieron con papel laminado, para no influir en la instrumentación. Para la irrigación, se utilizaron 5 ml de solución salina en cada cambio de instrumento. Una vez finalizada la instrumentación, los bloques se fotografiaron y analizaron en un programa informático para comparar el pre y posinstrumentación. En el análisis estadístico se realizaron las pruebas S Shapiro-Wilk, T para muestras independientes y Mann Whitney. En las condiciones experimentales en las que se realizó esta investigación, se concluye que luego del tercer uso no hubo diferencias significativas en relación con el transporte apical, sin embargo, los instrumentos del grupo W-File tuvieron preparaciones más conservadoras, con una mejor capacidad de centralización. en comparación con los instrumentos del grupo WaveOne Gold, lo que provocó preparaciones de mayor diámetro.A instrumentação é um passo fundamental no tratamento endodôntico para promover uma adequada limpeza e modelagem do conduto. O objetivo desse estudo foi comparar a capacidade de corte de dois sistemas reciprocante de níquel-titânio em blocos de canais simulados. Foram utilizados 60 blocos de acrílico, que foram separados em dois grupos de limas reciprocantes (WaveOne Gold - WOG e W-File - WF) com 30 blocos cada, e subdivididos em 3 grupos (n=10), representando o primeiro, segundo e terceiro uso: WOG1, WOG2, WOG3, WF1, WF2 e WF3. Foi injetada tinta nanquim nos canais simulados, os quais foram cobertos com papel laminado, para não haver influência na instrumentação. Para irrigação foram utilizados 5mL de solução salina a cada troca de instrumento. Após o término das instrumentações, os blocos foram fotografados e analisados em um programa de computador para comparar o pré e pós-instrumentação. Na análise estatística foram realizados os testes S Shapiro-Wilk, T para amostras independentes e Mann Whitney. Nas condições experimentais que essa pesquisa foi conduzida, conclui-se que após o terceiro uso não houve diferenças significativa em relação ao transporte apical, porém, os instrumentos do grupo W-File obtiveram preparos mais conservadores, com uma melhor capacidade de centralização em comparação com os instrumentos do grupo WaveOne Gold, que ocasionaram preparos com um maior diâmetro.Research, Society and Development2021-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2190010.33448/rsd-v10i14.21900Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 14; e207101421900Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 14; e207101421900Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 14; e2071014219002525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21900/19510Copyright (c) 2021 Adolfo de Matos de Carvalho; Marcely Reis da Silva; Matheus Almeida Rodrigues; Edeilton Santana de Oliveira Junior; Caio Cesar Souza; Cesar Augusto Perini Rosas; Ryhan Menezes Cardoso; Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeirohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Adolfo de Matos deSilva, Marcely Reis daRodrigues, Matheus AlmeidaOliveira Junior, Edeilton Santana deSouza, Caio CesarRosas, Cesar Augusto PeriniCardoso, Ryhan MenezesLimoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva 2021-12-04T11:48:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21900Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:41:13.042353Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file) Evaluación de la capacidad de corte de dos instrumentos alternativos después del tercer uso (Wa-veOne Gold y W-file) Avaliação da capacidade de corte de dois instrumentos reciprocantes após terceiro uso (WaveOne Gold e W-file) |
title |
Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file) |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file) Carvalho, Adolfo de Matos de Endodontics Simulated canals WaveOne Gold W-File. Canais simulados Endodontia WaveOne Gold W-File. Canales simulados Endodoncia WaveOne Gold W-file. |
title_short |
Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file) |
title_full |
Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file) |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file) |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the cutting ability of two reciprocating instruments (WaveOne Gold e W-file) |
author |
Carvalho, Adolfo de Matos de |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Adolfo de Matos de Silva, Marcely Reis da Rodrigues, Matheus Almeida Oliveira Junior, Edeilton Santana de Souza, Caio Cesar Rosas, Cesar Augusto Perini Cardoso, Ryhan Menezes Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Marcely Reis da Rodrigues, Matheus Almeida Oliveira Junior, Edeilton Santana de Souza, Caio Cesar Rosas, Cesar Augusto Perini Cardoso, Ryhan Menezes Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Adolfo de Matos de Silva, Marcely Reis da Rodrigues, Matheus Almeida Oliveira Junior, Edeilton Santana de Souza, Caio Cesar Rosas, Cesar Augusto Perini Cardoso, Ryhan Menezes Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Endodontics Simulated canals WaveOne Gold W-File. Canais simulados Endodontia WaveOne Gold W-File. Canales simulados Endodoncia WaveOne Gold W-file. |
topic |
Endodontics Simulated canals WaveOne Gold W-File. Canais simulados Endodontia WaveOne Gold W-File. Canales simulados Endodoncia WaveOne Gold W-file. |
description |
Instrumentation is a fundamental step in endodontic treatment to promote proper cleaning and shaping of the canal. The objective of this study was to compare the cutting capacity of two reciprocal nickel-titanium systems in simulated canal blocks. Sixty acrylic blocks were used, divided into two groups of reciprocal files (WaveOne Gold - WOG and W-File - WF), each with 30 blocks and divided into 3 groups (n=10) representing the first, second and third uses: WOG1, WOG2, WOG3, WF1, WF2, and WF3, respectively. Ink was injected into the simulated channels, which were covered with laminated paper to avoid affecting the instrumentation. For irrigation, 5mL of saline was used at each instrument change. At the end of instrumentation, the blocks were photographed and analyzed in a computer program to compare the results before and after instrumentation. In the statistical analysis, the tests S Shapiro-Wilk, T for independent samples and Mann Whitney were performed. Under the experimental conditions in which this study was conducted, it is concluded that there were no significant differences in apical transport after the third application. However, the instruments of the W-File group had more conservative preparations with a better centralization capacity compared to the instruments of the WaveOne Gold group, which caused preparations with a larger diameter. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21900 10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21900 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21900 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21900 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21900/19510 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 14; e207101421900 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 14; e207101421900 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 14; e207101421900 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052694136881152 |