The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18466 |
Resumo: | The aim of this article is to analyze the evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco, in the period from 2013 to 2018. The study, characterized as analytical-descriptive, was based on secondary data on Pronaf obtained from the Central Bank of Brazil and on the characteristics of family establishments in the 2017 Census of Agriculture. The Geometric Growth Rate (GGR) was also used to analyze the percentages of annual average increase or loss of variables associated with Pronaf. The results signaled a slight drop in the number of total Program contracts and consistency in the total monetary values. From the perspective of the DRs, there was a punctual growth and significant decreases in the number of total contracts, in contrast to more significant decreases, and in a greater number of Regions, considering to the values of the contracts. Regarding the different activities financed, it was observed opposite scenarios for agriculture and livestock, in which the decrease in agricultural contracts was more expressive than the increases in livestock financing. Consequently, inequalities were found between the Regions and it was evidenced that around 50% of Pronaf rural credit was concentrated in three DRs, which are also the areas that bring together the largest number of family establishments. However, they have one of the lowest percentages of technical assistance, corroborating with the premise that more voluminous resources have not been reflected in greater possibilities of specific support for their application in rural establishments. |
id |
UNIFEI_6eb28b6752eb029913f5781f7859782e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18466 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of PernambucoLa evolución del Pronaf en las Regiones de Desarrollo (RD) de PernambucoA evolução do Pronaf nas Regiões de Desenvolvimento (RD) de PernambucoFamily farmingPronafFarm creditDevelopment RegionsPernambuco.Agricultura familiarPronafCrédito ruralRegiones de DesarrolloPernambuco.Agricultura familiarPronafCrédito ruralRegiões de DesenvolvimentoPernambuco.The aim of this article is to analyze the evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco, in the period from 2013 to 2018. The study, characterized as analytical-descriptive, was based on secondary data on Pronaf obtained from the Central Bank of Brazil and on the characteristics of family establishments in the 2017 Census of Agriculture. The Geometric Growth Rate (GGR) was also used to analyze the percentages of annual average increase or loss of variables associated with Pronaf. The results signaled a slight drop in the number of total Program contracts and consistency in the total monetary values. From the perspective of the DRs, there was a punctual growth and significant decreases in the number of total contracts, in contrast to more significant decreases, and in a greater number of Regions, considering to the values of the contracts. Regarding the different activities financed, it was observed opposite scenarios for agriculture and livestock, in which the decrease in agricultural contracts was more expressive than the increases in livestock financing. Consequently, inequalities were found between the Regions and it was evidenced that around 50% of Pronaf rural credit was concentrated in three DRs, which are also the areas that bring together the largest number of family establishments. However, they have one of the lowest percentages of technical assistance, corroborating with the premise that more voluminous resources have not been reflected in greater possibilities of specific support for their application in rural establishments.El propósito de este artículo es analizar la evolución del Pronaf en las Regiones de Desarrollo (RD) de Pernambuco, en el período de 2013 a 2018. El estudio, caracterizado como analítico-descriptivo, se basó en datos secundarios del Pronaf obtenidos del Banco Central de Brasil sobre las características de los establecimientos familiares en el Censo Agropecuario de 2017. También se utilizó la Tasa de Crecimiento Geométrico (TGC) para analizar los porcentajes de aumento o pérdida promedio anual de las variables asociadas al Pronaf. Los resultados indican una leve disminución en el número de contratos totales del Programa y una constancia en los valores monetarios totales. Desde la perspectiva de los DR, hubo crecimientos ocasionales y caídas significativas en el número de contratos totales, en contraste con caídas más expresivas, y en una mayor cantidad de Regiones, en términos de valor de los contratos. En cuanto a las distintas actividades financiadas, se observó escenarios inversos para la agricultura y la ganadería, en los que las caídas anuales en los contratos agrícolas fueron mucho más relevantes que los aumentos observados en la ganadería. Así, se encontraron desigualdades entre las Regiones y se evidenció que alrededor del 50% del crédito rural del Pronaf se concentraba en tres RD, que también son las áreas con mayor número de establecimientos familiares. Sin embargo, presentan menores porcentajes de asistencia técnica, corroborando la premisa de que recursos más voluminosos no se han reflejado en mayores posibilidades de apoyo específico para su aplicación en establecimientos rurales.O objetivo deste artigo é analisar a evolução do Pronaf nas Regiões de Desenvolvimento (RD) de Pernambuco, no período de 2013 a 2018. O estudo, caracterizado como analítico-descritivo, embasou-se em dados secundários sobre o Pronaf obtidos no Banco Central do Brasil e a respeito das características dos estabelecimentos familiares no Censo Agropecuário de 2017. Recorreu-se também à Taxa Geométrica de Crescimento (TGC) para analisar os percentuais de incremento ou perda média anual das variáveis associadas ao Pronaf. Os resultados sinalizam leve queda no número de contratos totais do Programa e constância nos valores monetários totais. Pela perspectiva das RDs, evidenciou-se pontual crescimento e quedas significativas quanto ao número de contratos totais, em contraposição a diminuições mais expressivas, e em um quantitativo maior de Regiões, no que se refere aos valores dos contratos. Acerca das diferentes atividades financiadas, notou-se panoramas inversos para a agricultura e a pecuária, em que as quedas anuais nos contratos agrícolas foram bem mais relevantes que os aumentos verificados na pecuária. Assim, constatou-se desigualdades entre as Regiões e evidenciou-se que cerca de 50% do crédito rural do Pronaf se concentrou em três RDs, que são também as áreas que reúnem o maior número de estabelecimentos familiares. No entanto, apresentam menores percentuais de assistência técnica, corroborando-se com a premissa de que recursos mais volumosos não têm se refletido em maiores possibilidades de suporte específico para a sua aplicação nos estabelecimentos rurais.Research, Society and Development2021-08-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1846610.33448/rsd-v10i10.18466Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e59101018466Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e59101018466Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e591010184662525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18466/16586Copyright (c) 2021 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFialho, Micheli FontesFerreira Neto, José Ambrósio Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos2021-10-02T21:49:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18466Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:36.010764Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco La evolución del Pronaf en las Regiones de Desarrollo (RD) de Pernambuco A evolução do Pronaf nas Regiões de Desenvolvimento (RD) de Pernambuco |
title |
The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco |
spellingShingle |
The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco Fialho, Micheli Fontes Family farming Pronaf Farm credit Development Regions Pernambuco. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Crédito rural Regiones de Desarrollo Pernambuco. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Crédito rural Regiões de Desenvolvimento Pernambuco. |
title_short |
The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco |
title_full |
The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco |
title_fullStr |
The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco |
title_full_unstemmed |
The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco |
title_sort |
The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco |
author |
Fialho, Micheli Fontes |
author_facet |
Fialho, Micheli Fontes Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fialho, Micheli Fontes Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Family farming Pronaf Farm credit Development Regions Pernambuco. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Crédito rural Regiones de Desarrollo Pernambuco. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Crédito rural Regiões de Desenvolvimento Pernambuco. |
topic |
Family farming Pronaf Farm credit Development Regions Pernambuco. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Crédito rural Regiones de Desarrollo Pernambuco. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Crédito rural Regiões de Desenvolvimento Pernambuco. |
description |
The aim of this article is to analyze the evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco, in the period from 2013 to 2018. The study, characterized as analytical-descriptive, was based on secondary data on Pronaf obtained from the Central Bank of Brazil and on the characteristics of family establishments in the 2017 Census of Agriculture. The Geometric Growth Rate (GGR) was also used to analyze the percentages of annual average increase or loss of variables associated with Pronaf. The results signaled a slight drop in the number of total Program contracts and consistency in the total monetary values. From the perspective of the DRs, there was a punctual growth and significant decreases in the number of total contracts, in contrast to more significant decreases, and in a greater number of Regions, considering to the values of the contracts. Regarding the different activities financed, it was observed opposite scenarios for agriculture and livestock, in which the decrease in agricultural contracts was more expressive than the increases in livestock financing. Consequently, inequalities were found between the Regions and it was evidenced that around 50% of Pronaf rural credit was concentrated in three DRs, which are also the areas that bring together the largest number of family establishments. However, they have one of the lowest percentages of technical assistance, corroborating with the premise that more voluminous resources have not been reflected in greater possibilities of specific support for their application in rural establishments. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18466 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18466 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18466 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18466 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18466/16586 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e59101018466 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e59101018466 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e59101018466 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052685145341952 |