The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fialho, Micheli Fontes
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio, Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18466
Resumo: The aim of this article is to analyze the evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco, in the period from 2013 to 2018. The study, characterized as analytical-descriptive, was based on secondary data on Pronaf obtained from the Central Bank of Brazil and on the characteristics of family establishments in the 2017 Census of Agriculture. The Geometric Growth Rate (GGR) was also used to analyze the percentages of annual average increase or loss of variables associated with Pronaf. The results signaled a slight drop in the number of total Program contracts and consistency in the total monetary values. From the perspective of the DRs, there was a punctual growth and significant decreases in the number of total contracts, in contrast to more significant decreases, and in a greater number of Regions, considering to the values of the contracts. Regarding the different activities financed, it was observed opposite scenarios for agriculture and livestock, in which the decrease in agricultural contracts was more expressive than the increases in livestock financing. Consequently, inequalities were found between the Regions and it was evidenced that around 50% of Pronaf rural credit was concentrated in three DRs, which are also the areas that bring together the largest number of family establishments. However, they have one of the lowest percentages of technical assistance, corroborating with the premise that more voluminous resources have not been reflected in greater possibilities of specific support for their application in rural establishments.
id UNIFEI_6eb28b6752eb029913f5781f7859782e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18466
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of PernambucoLa evolución del Pronaf en las Regiones de Desarrollo (RD) de PernambucoA evolução do Pronaf nas Regiões de Desenvolvimento (RD) de PernambucoFamily farmingPronafFarm creditDevelopment RegionsPernambuco.Agricultura familiarPronafCrédito ruralRegiones de DesarrolloPernambuco.Agricultura familiarPronafCrédito ruralRegiões de DesenvolvimentoPernambuco.The aim of this article is to analyze the evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco, in the period from 2013 to 2018. The study, characterized as analytical-descriptive, was based on secondary data on Pronaf obtained from the Central Bank of Brazil and on the characteristics of family establishments in the 2017 Census of Agriculture. The Geometric Growth Rate (GGR) was also used to analyze the percentages of annual average increase or loss of variables associated with Pronaf. The results signaled a slight drop in the number of total Program contracts and consistency in the total monetary values. From the perspective of the DRs, there was a punctual growth and significant decreases in the number of total contracts, in contrast to more significant decreases, and in a greater number of Regions, considering to the values of the contracts. Regarding the different activities financed, it was observed opposite scenarios for agriculture and livestock, in which the decrease in agricultural contracts was more expressive than the increases in livestock financing. Consequently, inequalities were found between the Regions and it was evidenced that around 50% of Pronaf rural credit was concentrated in three DRs, which are also the areas that bring together the largest number of family establishments. However, they have one of the lowest percentages of technical assistance, corroborating with the premise that more voluminous resources have not been reflected in greater possibilities of specific support for their application in rural establishments.El propósito de este artículo es analizar la evolución del Pronaf en las Regiones de Desarrollo (RD) de Pernambuco, en el período de 2013 a 2018. El estudio, caracterizado como analítico-descriptivo, se basó en datos secundarios del Pronaf obtenidos del Banco Central de Brasil sobre las características de los establecimientos familiares en el Censo Agropecuario de 2017. También se utilizó la Tasa de Crecimiento Geométrico (TGC) para analizar los porcentajes de aumento o pérdida promedio anual de las variables asociadas al Pronaf. Los resultados indican una leve disminución en el número de contratos totales del Programa y una constancia en los valores monetarios totales. Desde la perspectiva de los DR, hubo crecimientos ocasionales y caídas significativas en el número de contratos totales, en contraste con caídas más expresivas, y en una mayor cantidad de Regiones, en términos de valor de los contratos. En cuanto a las distintas actividades financiadas, se observó escenarios inversos para la agricultura y la ganadería, en los que las caídas anuales en los contratos agrícolas fueron mucho más relevantes que los aumentos observados en la ganadería. Así, se encontraron desigualdades entre las Regiones y se evidenció que alrededor del 50% del crédito rural del Pronaf se concentraba en tres RD, que también son las áreas con mayor número de establecimientos familiares. Sin embargo, presentan menores porcentajes de asistencia técnica, corroborando la premisa de que recursos más voluminosos no se han reflejado en mayores posibilidades de apoyo específico para su aplicación en establecimientos rurales.O objetivo deste artigo é analisar a evolução do Pronaf nas Regiões de Desenvolvimento (RD) de Pernambuco, no período de 2013 a 2018. O estudo, caracterizado como analítico-descritivo, embasou-se em dados secundários sobre o Pronaf obtidos no Banco Central do Brasil e a respeito das características dos estabelecimentos familiares no Censo Agropecuário de 2017. Recorreu-se também à Taxa Geométrica de Crescimento (TGC) para analisar os percentuais de incremento ou perda média anual das variáveis associadas ao Pronaf. Os resultados sinalizam leve queda no número de contratos totais do Programa e constância nos valores monetários totais. Pela perspectiva das RDs, evidenciou-se pontual crescimento e quedas significativas quanto ao número de contratos totais, em contraposição a diminuições mais expressivas, e em um quantitativo maior de Regiões, no que se refere aos valores dos contratos. Acerca das diferentes atividades financiadas, notou-se panoramas inversos para a agricultura e a pecuária, em que as quedas anuais nos contratos agrícolas foram bem mais relevantes que os aumentos verificados na pecuária. Assim, constatou-se desigualdades entre as Regiões e evidenciou-se que cerca de 50% do crédito rural do Pronaf se concentrou em três RDs, que são também as áreas que reúnem o maior número de estabelecimentos familiares. No entanto, apresentam menores percentuais de assistência técnica, corroborando-se com a premissa de que recursos mais volumosos não têm se refletido em maiores possibilidades de suporte específico para a sua aplicação nos estabelecimentos rurais.Research, Society and Development2021-08-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1846610.33448/rsd-v10i10.18466Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e59101018466Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e59101018466Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e591010184662525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18466/16586Copyright (c) 2021 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFialho, Micheli FontesFerreira Neto, José Ambrósio Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos2021-10-02T21:49:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18466Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:38:36.010764Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco
La evolución del Pronaf en las Regiones de Desarrollo (RD) de Pernambuco
A evolução do Pronaf nas Regiões de Desenvolvimento (RD) de Pernambuco
title The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco
spellingShingle The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco
Fialho, Micheli Fontes
Family farming
Pronaf
Farm credit
Development Regions
Pernambuco.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Crédito rural
Regiones de Desarrollo
Pernambuco.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Crédito rural
Regiões de Desenvolvimento
Pernambuco.
title_short The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco
title_full The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco
title_fullStr The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco
title_sort The evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco
author Fialho, Micheli Fontes
author_facet Fialho, Micheli Fontes
Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio
Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos
author_role author
author2 Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio
Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fialho, Micheli Fontes
Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio
Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Family farming
Pronaf
Farm credit
Development Regions
Pernambuco.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Crédito rural
Regiones de Desarrollo
Pernambuco.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Crédito rural
Regiões de Desenvolvimento
Pernambuco.
topic Family farming
Pronaf
Farm credit
Development Regions
Pernambuco.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Crédito rural
Regiones de Desarrollo
Pernambuco.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Crédito rural
Regiões de Desenvolvimento
Pernambuco.
description The aim of this article is to analyze the evolution of Pronaf in the Development Regions (DR) of Pernambuco, in the period from 2013 to 2018. The study, characterized as analytical-descriptive, was based on secondary data on Pronaf obtained from the Central Bank of Brazil and on the characteristics of family establishments in the 2017 Census of Agriculture. The Geometric Growth Rate (GGR) was also used to analyze the percentages of annual average increase or loss of variables associated with Pronaf. The results signaled a slight drop in the number of total Program contracts and consistency in the total monetary values. From the perspective of the DRs, there was a punctual growth and significant decreases in the number of total contracts, in contrast to more significant decreases, and in a greater number of Regions, considering to the values of the contracts. Regarding the different activities financed, it was observed opposite scenarios for agriculture and livestock, in which the decrease in agricultural contracts was more expressive than the increases in livestock financing. Consequently, inequalities were found between the Regions and it was evidenced that around 50% of Pronaf rural credit was concentrated in three DRs, which are also the areas that bring together the largest number of family establishments. However, they have one of the lowest percentages of technical assistance, corroborating with the premise that more voluminous resources have not been reflected in greater possibilities of specific support for their application in rural establishments.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18466
10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18466
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18466
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18466
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/18466/16586
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 10; e59101018466
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 10; e59101018466
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 10; e59101018466
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052685145341952