Toxicity assessment of mastic and pomegranate tinctures using the Artemia salina bioassay

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Ana Cristina Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Costa, Jane Kenya Nogueira da, Herbert, Adyson, Farias, Fabrício Rômulo Sampaio, Rezende, Márcia, Kozlowski Junior, Vitoldo Antonio, Geus, Juliana Larocca de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13751
Resumo: This work aimed to evaluate the toxicity of the mastic (Myracrodruon urundeuva) and pomegranate (Punica granatum) tinctures through the bioassay with Artemia salina. Different dye concentrations (25, 50, 75, 150, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 μg/mL) were added to the nauplii and the average lethal concentration (CL50) was evaluated using Probit analysis using the StatPlus® software (AnalystSoft, USA), obtaining the upper and lower confidence intervals, after a 24-hour exposure period. The extracts were considered active when the values were < 1000ug/mL. Survival curves and LogRank tests were performed for all extracts at a concentration of 250 μg / mL against negative control (Saline) and positive control (Chlorhexidine), using the GraphPad® Prism software (GraphPad Software, USA). For the mastic, the LC50 was 607.87 ± 38.73, for the pomegranate, 464.98 ± 28.72, both tinctures being considered active. When compared to saline, there was a significant difference in survival curves (p = 0.0206), the same occurred for comparisons with chlorhexidine (p < 0.0001). It can be concluded that mastic and pomegranate tinctures were toxic against Artemia salina in the different concentrations tested.
id UNIFEI_7e3bdca55ff36d5b0a381b2047cbe810
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13751
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Toxicity assessment of mastic and pomegranate tinctures using the Artemia salina bioassayEvaluación de la toxicidad de las tinturas de masilla y granada mediante el bioensayo de Artemia salinaAvaliação da toxicidade das tinturas de aroeira e de romã através do bioensaio com Artemia salinaPunicaceaeBurseraToxicity Tests.PunicaceaeBurseraPruebas de Toxicidad.PunicaceaeBurseraTestes de Toxicidade.This work aimed to evaluate the toxicity of the mastic (Myracrodruon urundeuva) and pomegranate (Punica granatum) tinctures through the bioassay with Artemia salina. Different dye concentrations (25, 50, 75, 150, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 μg/mL) were added to the nauplii and the average lethal concentration (CL50) was evaluated using Probit analysis using the StatPlus® software (AnalystSoft, USA), obtaining the upper and lower confidence intervals, after a 24-hour exposure period. The extracts were considered active when the values were < 1000ug/mL. Survival curves and LogRank tests were performed for all extracts at a concentration of 250 μg / mL against negative control (Saline) and positive control (Chlorhexidine), using the GraphPad® Prism software (GraphPad Software, USA). For the mastic, the LC50 was 607.87 ± 38.73, for the pomegranate, 464.98 ± 28.72, both tinctures being considered active. When compared to saline, there was a significant difference in survival curves (p = 0.0206), the same occurred for comparisons with chlorhexidine (p < 0.0001). It can be concluded that mastic and pomegranate tinctures were toxic against Artemia salina in the different concentrations tested.Este trabajo tuvo como objetivo evaluar la toxicidad de las tinturas de masilla (Myracrodruon urundeuva) y granada (Punica granatum) a través del bioensayo con Artemia salina. Se agregaron diferentes concentraciones de colorante (25, 50, 75, 150, 250, 500, 750 y 1000 μg/mL) a los nauplios y se evaluó la concentración letal promedio (CL50) mediante análisis Probit utilizando el software StatPlus® (AnalystSoft, EE. UU.), obteniendo los intervalos de confianza superior e inferior, después de un período de exposición de 24 horas. Los extractos se consideraron activos cuando los valores eran <1000ug / mL. Se realizaron curvas de supervivencia y pruebas de LogRank para todos los extractos a una concentración de 250 μg / mL contra control negativo (solución salina) y control positivo (clorhexidina), utilizando el software GraphPad® Prism (GraphPad Software, EE. UU.). Para la masilla, la CL50 fue de 607,87 ± 38,73, para la granada, 464,98 ± 28,72, considerándose los dos tinturas activas. En comparación con la solución salina, hubo una diferencia significativa en las curvas de supervivencia (p = 0,0206), lo mismo ocurrió para las comparaciones con clorhexidina (p < 0,0001). Se puede concluir que las tinturas de masilla y granada resultaron tóxicas contra Artemia salina en las diferentes concentraciones ensayadas.Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a toxicidade das tinturas de aroeira (Myracrodruon urundeuva) e de romã (Punica granatum) por meio do bioensaio com Artemia salina. Diferentes concentrações das tinturas (25, 50, 75, 150, 250, 500, 750 e 1000μg/mL) foram adicionadas aos náuplios e a concentração letal média (CL50) foi avaliada, utilizando a análise de Probit através do software StatPlus® (AnalystSoft, USA), obtendo-se os intervalos de confiança superior e inferior, após um período de exposição de 24 horas. Os extratos foram considerados ativos quando os valores foram < 1000 ug/mL. Curvas de sobrevivência e testes de LogRank foram realizados para todos os extratos na concentração de 250 μg/mL contra controle negativo (Salina) e controle positivo (Clorexidina), utilizando o software GraphPad® Prism (GraphPad Software, USA). Para a aroeira a CL50 foi de 607,87 ± 38,73, já para a romã, de 464,98 ± 28,72, sendo ambas as tinturas consideradas ativas. Quando comparadas à solução salina, houve diferença significativa nas curvas de sobrevivência (p = 0,0206), o mesmo ocorreu para as comparações com a clorexidina (p < 0,0001). Pode-se concluir que as tinturas de aroeira e de romã foram tóxicas contra a Artemia salina nas diferentes concentrações testadas.Research, Society and Development2021-03-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1375110.33448/rsd-v10i3.13751Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 3; e52010313751Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 3; e52010313751Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 3; e520103137512525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13751/14365Copyright (c) 2021 Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins; Jane Kenya Nogueira da Costa; Adyson Herbert; Fabrício Rômulo Sampaio Farias; Márcia Rezende; Vitoldo Antonio Kozlowski Junior; Juliana Larocca de Geushttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins, Ana Cristina Rodrigues Costa, Jane Kenya Nogueira da Herbert, Adyson Farias, Fabrício Rômulo Sampaio Rezende, MárciaKozlowski Junior, Vitoldo Antonio Geus, Juliana Larocca de 2021-03-28T12:03:35Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13751Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:01.754338Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Toxicity assessment of mastic and pomegranate tinctures using the Artemia salina bioassay
Evaluación de la toxicidad de las tinturas de masilla y granada mediante el bioensayo de Artemia salina
Avaliação da toxicidade das tinturas de aroeira e de romã através do bioensaio com Artemia salina
title Toxicity assessment of mastic and pomegranate tinctures using the Artemia salina bioassay
spellingShingle Toxicity assessment of mastic and pomegranate tinctures using the Artemia salina bioassay
Martins, Ana Cristina Rodrigues
Punicaceae
Bursera
Toxicity Tests.
Punicaceae
Bursera
Pruebas de Toxicidad.
Punicaceae
Bursera
Testes de Toxicidade.
title_short Toxicity assessment of mastic and pomegranate tinctures using the Artemia salina bioassay
title_full Toxicity assessment of mastic and pomegranate tinctures using the Artemia salina bioassay
title_fullStr Toxicity assessment of mastic and pomegranate tinctures using the Artemia salina bioassay
title_full_unstemmed Toxicity assessment of mastic and pomegranate tinctures using the Artemia salina bioassay
title_sort Toxicity assessment of mastic and pomegranate tinctures using the Artemia salina bioassay
author Martins, Ana Cristina Rodrigues
author_facet Martins, Ana Cristina Rodrigues
Costa, Jane Kenya Nogueira da
Herbert, Adyson
Farias, Fabrício Rômulo Sampaio
Rezende, Márcia
Kozlowski Junior, Vitoldo Antonio
Geus, Juliana Larocca de
author_role author
author2 Costa, Jane Kenya Nogueira da
Herbert, Adyson
Farias, Fabrício Rômulo Sampaio
Rezende, Márcia
Kozlowski Junior, Vitoldo Antonio
Geus, Juliana Larocca de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Ana Cristina Rodrigues
Costa, Jane Kenya Nogueira da
Herbert, Adyson
Farias, Fabrício Rômulo Sampaio
Rezende, Márcia
Kozlowski Junior, Vitoldo Antonio
Geus, Juliana Larocca de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Punicaceae
Bursera
Toxicity Tests.
Punicaceae
Bursera
Pruebas de Toxicidad.
Punicaceae
Bursera
Testes de Toxicidade.
topic Punicaceae
Bursera
Toxicity Tests.
Punicaceae
Bursera
Pruebas de Toxicidad.
Punicaceae
Bursera
Testes de Toxicidade.
description This work aimed to evaluate the toxicity of the mastic (Myracrodruon urundeuva) and pomegranate (Punica granatum) tinctures through the bioassay with Artemia salina. Different dye concentrations (25, 50, 75, 150, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 μg/mL) were added to the nauplii and the average lethal concentration (CL50) was evaluated using Probit analysis using the StatPlus® software (AnalystSoft, USA), obtaining the upper and lower confidence intervals, after a 24-hour exposure period. The extracts were considered active when the values were < 1000ug/mL. Survival curves and LogRank tests were performed for all extracts at a concentration of 250 μg / mL against negative control (Saline) and positive control (Chlorhexidine), using the GraphPad® Prism software (GraphPad Software, USA). For the mastic, the LC50 was 607.87 ± 38.73, for the pomegranate, 464.98 ± 28.72, both tinctures being considered active. When compared to saline, there was a significant difference in survival curves (p = 0.0206), the same occurred for comparisons with chlorhexidine (p < 0.0001). It can be concluded that mastic and pomegranate tinctures were toxic against Artemia salina in the different concentrations tested.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13751
10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13751
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13751
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i3.13751
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13751/14365
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 3; e52010313751
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 3; e52010313751
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 3; e52010313751
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052747134009344