Comparison of corporate behaviors in favor of honest and liar spokes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bispo, Josefa Aparecida Ribeiro
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Santos, Mariza de Jesus, Santos, Nathália Monteiro, Santos, José Marcos de Jesus, César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Ribeiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24998
Resumo: Objective: To compare body movements between honest and false discourses. Method: A quantitative and transversal study, with descriptive and analytical approaches, performed with 40 subjects equally distributed in two groups regarding sex. The participants did not present evidences of deficiency (auditory, visual, physical or neuromotor), they remained with the hair fixed and seated during the filming of the narrative of the true and false speeches, being interpreted previously the basic movements of each subject. The obtained data were analyzed, compared and submitted to the statistical analysis in the SPSS program using the univariate and bivariate techniques and the Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests, with significance level p <0.05. Study approved by the Ethics Committee. Results: The main body alterations identified in the false speech that differed from the true one in the descriptive analysis were: tension in orbicular (increase of 35%), moderate movement of the upper limbs (increase of 30%), deep breathing (increase of 20%), (10% increase) and moderate movement (increase of 10%) and elevation of the lower limbs (increase of 10%), but without statistical evidence of association with the type of speech . In the modification of posture (increase of 15%), perceived by head or trunk movement, there was a statistically significant association to false speech (p = 0.007). Conclusion: During the production of lying speeches there was a tendency to change the body movement, having as main trigger point the postural alteration.
id UNIFEI_819a5ada547eadd3a2fb7c80371a66d4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24998
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of corporate behaviors in favor of honest and liar spokesComparación de comportamientos corporales con discursos honestos y mentirososComparação dos comportamentos corporais frente a discursos honestos e mentirosos BodySpeech-Language PathologyDeception.CuerpoFonoaudiologiaDecepción.CorpoFonoaudiologiaDecepção.Objective: To compare body movements between honest and false discourses. Method: A quantitative and transversal study, with descriptive and analytical approaches, performed with 40 subjects equally distributed in two groups regarding sex. The participants did not present evidences of deficiency (auditory, visual, physical or neuromotor), they remained with the hair fixed and seated during the filming of the narrative of the true and false speeches, being interpreted previously the basic movements of each subject. The obtained data were analyzed, compared and submitted to the statistical analysis in the SPSS program using the univariate and bivariate techniques and the Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests, with significance level p <0.05. Study approved by the Ethics Committee. Results: The main body alterations identified in the false speech that differed from the true one in the descriptive analysis were: tension in orbicular (increase of 35%), moderate movement of the upper limbs (increase of 30%), deep breathing (increase of 20%), (10% increase) and moderate movement (increase of 10%) and elevation of the lower limbs (increase of 10%), but without statistical evidence of association with the type of speech . In the modification of posture (increase of 15%), perceived by head or trunk movement, there was a statistically significant association to false speech (p = 0.007). Conclusion: During the production of lying speeches there was a tendency to change the body movement, having as main trigger point the postural alteration.Objetivo: comparar los movimientos corporales entre discursos honestos y falsos. Método: Estudio cuantitativo y transversal, con abordaje descriptivo y analítico, realizado con 40 sujetos distribuidos equitativamente en dos grupos según género. Los participantes no mostraron evidencia de discapacidad (auditiva, visual, física o neuromotora), mantuvieron el cabello recogido y se sentaron durante el rodaje de la narrativa de discursos verdaderos y falsos, siendo previamente interpretados los movimientos básicos de cada sujeto. Los datos obtenidos fueron analizados, comparados y sometidos a análisis estadístico en el programa SPSS mediante técnicas uni y bivariadas y las pruebas de chi-cuadrado y exacta de Fisher, con un nivel de significación de p <0,05. Estudio aprobado por el Comité de Ética. Resultados: Los principales cambios corporales identificados en el discurso falso que difirieron del verdadero en el análisis descriptivo fueron: tensión orbicular de los ojos (aumento del 35%), movimiento moderado de los miembros superiores (aumento del 30%), respiración profunda (aumento del 20%). , parpadeo excesivo (aumento del 15%), desviación de la mirada (aumento del 10%) y movimiento moderado (aumento del 10%) y elevación de las extremidades inferiores (aumento del 10%), pero sin evidencia estadística de asociación con el tipo de habla. En la modificación de la postura (aumento del 15%), percibida por el movimiento de la cabeza o del tronco, hubo una asociación estadísticamente significativa con el habla falsa (p = 0,007). Conclusión: Durante la producción de discursos mentirosos, hubo una tendencia a cambiar el movimiento corporal, siendo el cambio de postura el principal desencadenante.Objetivo: Comparar os movimentos corporais entre discursos honestos e falsos. Método: Estudo quantitativo e transversal, com abordagens descritiva e analítica, realizado com 40 sujeitos distribuídos igualitariamente em dois grupos quanto ao sexo. Os participantes não apresentavam evidências de deficiência (auditiva, visual, física ou neuromotora), permaneceram com os cabelos presos e sentados durante a filmagem da narrativa dos discursos verdadeiro e falso, sendo interpretados previamente os movimentos de base de cada sujeito. Os dados obtidos foram analisados, comparados e submetidos às análises estatísticas no programa SPSS pelas técnicas uni e bivariada e os testes Qui-quadrado e Exato de Fisher, tendo nível de significância p < 0,05. Estudo aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética. Resultados: As principais alterações corporais identificadas no discurso falso que diferiram do verdadeiro na análise descritiva foram: tensão em orbicular (aumento de 35%), movimentação moderada dos membros superiores (aumento de 30%), respiração profunda (aumento de 20%), piscar excessivo (aumento de 15%), desvio no olhar (aumento de 10%) e movimentação moderada (aumento de 10%) e elevação dos membros inferiores (aumento de 10%), porém sem evidência estatística de associação com o tipo de discurso. Na modificação da postura (aumento de 15%), percebida por movimentação da cabeça ou tronco, houve associação estatisticamente significativa ao discurso falso (p= 0,007). Conclusão: Durante a produção de discursos mentirosos houve tendência à modificação do movimento corporal, tendo como principal ponto de gatilho a alteração postural.Research, Society and Development2022-01-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2499810.33448/rsd-v11i1.24998Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e36611124998Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e36611124998Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e366111249982525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24998/21970Copyright (c) 2022 Josefa Aparecida Ribeiro Bispo; Mariza de Jesus Santos; Nathália Monteiro Santos; José Marcos de Jesus Santos; Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Ribeiro Césarhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBispo, Josefa Aparecida RibeiroSantos, Mariza de Jesus Santos, Nathália MonteiroSantos, José Marcos de JesusCésar, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Ribeiro2022-01-16T18:08:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24998Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:23.116761Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of corporate behaviors in favor of honest and liar spokes
Comparación de comportamientos corporales con discursos honestos y mentirosos
Comparação dos comportamentos corporais frente a discursos honestos e mentirosos
title Comparison of corporate behaviors in favor of honest and liar spokes
spellingShingle Comparison of corporate behaviors in favor of honest and liar spokes
Bispo, Josefa Aparecida Ribeiro
Body
Speech-Language Pathology
Deception.
Cuerpo
Fonoaudiologia
Decepción.
Corpo
Fonoaudiologia
Decepção.
title_short Comparison of corporate behaviors in favor of honest and liar spokes
title_full Comparison of corporate behaviors in favor of honest and liar spokes
title_fullStr Comparison of corporate behaviors in favor of honest and liar spokes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of corporate behaviors in favor of honest and liar spokes
title_sort Comparison of corporate behaviors in favor of honest and liar spokes
author Bispo, Josefa Aparecida Ribeiro
author_facet Bispo, Josefa Aparecida Ribeiro
Santos, Mariza de Jesus
Santos, Nathália Monteiro
Santos, José Marcos de Jesus
César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Ribeiro
author_role author
author2 Santos, Mariza de Jesus
Santos, Nathália Monteiro
Santos, José Marcos de Jesus
César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Ribeiro
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bispo, Josefa Aparecida Ribeiro
Santos, Mariza de Jesus
Santos, Nathália Monteiro
Santos, José Marcos de Jesus
César, Carla Patrícia Hernandez Alves Ribeiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Body
Speech-Language Pathology
Deception.
Cuerpo
Fonoaudiologia
Decepción.
Corpo
Fonoaudiologia
Decepção.
topic Body
Speech-Language Pathology
Deception.
Cuerpo
Fonoaudiologia
Decepción.
Corpo
Fonoaudiologia
Decepção.
description Objective: To compare body movements between honest and false discourses. Method: A quantitative and transversal study, with descriptive and analytical approaches, performed with 40 subjects equally distributed in two groups regarding sex. The participants did not present evidences of deficiency (auditory, visual, physical or neuromotor), they remained with the hair fixed and seated during the filming of the narrative of the true and false speeches, being interpreted previously the basic movements of each subject. The obtained data were analyzed, compared and submitted to the statistical analysis in the SPSS program using the univariate and bivariate techniques and the Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests, with significance level p <0.05. Study approved by the Ethics Committee. Results: The main body alterations identified in the false speech that differed from the true one in the descriptive analysis were: tension in orbicular (increase of 35%), moderate movement of the upper limbs (increase of 30%), deep breathing (increase of 20%), (10% increase) and moderate movement (increase of 10%) and elevation of the lower limbs (increase of 10%), but without statistical evidence of association with the type of speech . In the modification of posture (increase of 15%), perceived by head or trunk movement, there was a statistically significant association to false speech (p = 0.007). Conclusion: During the production of lying speeches there was a tendency to change the body movement, having as main trigger point the postural alteration.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24998
10.33448/rsd-v11i1.24998
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24998
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i1.24998
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24998/21970
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e36611124998
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e36611124998
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e36611124998
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052835046621184