Evaluation of the shaping ability of two reciprocating systems: Reciproc Blue x V-File

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Maria Clara Santos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Simeão, Anna Elisa Souza, Souza, Caio Cesar, Rodrigues, Matheus Almeida, Bezerra, Edeilton Santana de Oliveira Júnior e, Carvalho , Adolfo de Matos de, Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22870
Resumo: Introduction: Cleaning and shaping are extremely important steps in the instrumentation of root canals so that endodontic treatment can be carried out with excellence. With the aim of optimizing working time and presenting a high-quality material, NiTi (nickel-titanium) files have been developed to ensure successful endodontic treatment. Acrylic blocks are used to obtain a pattern of simulated canals. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare Reciproc Blue and V-File files after their second use. Methods: 40 acrylic blocks were used, divided into four groups (n=10) according to the number of times each instrument was used: REC1, REC2, VF1 and VF2. Prior to root canal preparation, the patency of the root canal was checked with a #10 K file. Pre- and postoperative photographic images were created in image processing software (Adobe Photoshop CS5.1) for later superimposition and analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test and Mann Whitney test. Results: At all points studied, the Reciproc Blue instrument removed more resin from the outside at the beginning of the curve (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences at any of the points in terms of transport distance from the canal. The Reciproc Blue instrument had wider and less conservative preparations. Conclusion: Both instruments (Reciproc Blue and V-File) are safe for curved canal preparation and provide effective cleaning and shaping. However, the V-File instrument had more conservative preparations.
id UNIFEI_997bdc1b514f4cf00f73af5084f079e8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22870
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the shaping ability of two reciprocating systems: Reciproc Blue x V-FileEvaluación de la capacidad de modelado de dos sistemas alternativos: Reciproc Blue x V-FileAvaliação da capacidade de modelagem de dois sistemas reciprocantes: Reciproc Blue x V-FileRoot canalsNickel titaniumCanal preparation.Conductos radicularesNíquel titanioPreparación de canales.Canais radicularesNíquel titânioPreparo do canal.Introduction: Cleaning and shaping are extremely important steps in the instrumentation of root canals so that endodontic treatment can be carried out with excellence. With the aim of optimizing working time and presenting a high-quality material, NiTi (nickel-titanium) files have been developed to ensure successful endodontic treatment. Acrylic blocks are used to obtain a pattern of simulated canals. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare Reciproc Blue and V-File files after their second use. Methods: 40 acrylic blocks were used, divided into four groups (n=10) according to the number of times each instrument was used: REC1, REC2, VF1 and VF2. Prior to root canal preparation, the patency of the root canal was checked with a #10 K file. Pre- and postoperative photographic images were created in image processing software (Adobe Photoshop CS5.1) for later superimposition and analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test and Mann Whitney test. Results: At all points studied, the Reciproc Blue instrument removed more resin from the outside at the beginning of the curve (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences at any of the points in terms of transport distance from the canal. The Reciproc Blue instrument had wider and less conservative preparations. Conclusion: Both instruments (Reciproc Blue and V-File) are safe for curved canal preparation and provide effective cleaning and shaping. However, the V-File instrument had more conservative preparations.Introducción: La limpieza y el modelado son pasos extremadamente importantes en la instrumentación de los conductos radiculares para que se pueda realizar un tratamiento de endodoncia con excelencia. Con el objetivo de optimizar el tiempo de trabajo y presentar un material de calidad, se crearon limas NiTi (Nickel Titanium) que aseguran un tratamiento endodóntico exitoso. Los bloques acrílicos se utilizan para tener un patrón de canales simulados. Objetivo: Esta investigación tiene como objetivo comparar archivos Reciproc Blue y V-File, después de su segundo uso. Métodos: se utilizaron 40 bloques acrílicos, divididos en cuatro grupos (n = 10): REC1, REC2 VF1 y VF2. Antes de la preparación del conducto radicular, se verificó la permeabilidad del conducto radicular con una lima # 10 K. Se obtuvieron imágenes fotográficas pre y postoperatorias para su posterior superposición y análisis en software de imágenes (Adobe Photoshop CS5.1). El análisis estadístico se realizó mediante la prueba t y la prueba de Mann Whitney. Resultados: Se eliminó más resina del exterior al comienzo de la curva mediante el instrumento Reciproc Blue en todos los puntos examinados (p <0,05). En cuanto a la distancia de transporte desde el canal, no hubo diferencias significativas en ninguno de los puntos. El instrumento Reciproc Blue presentó preparaciones más amplias y menos conservadoras. Conclusión: Ambos instrumentos (Reciproc Blue y V-File) son seguros para la preparación de conductos curvos, ofreciendo una limpieza y un modelado eficaces. Sin embargo, el instrumento V-File presentó preparaciones más conservadoras.Introdução: A limpeza e modelagem, são etapas de extrema importância na instrumentação dos canais radiculares para que se tenha um tratamento endodôntico feito com excelência. Com o objetivo de otimizar o tempo de trabalho e apresentar um material de qualidade, foram criadas as limas de NiTi (Niquel Titânio) que asseguram um tratamento endodôntico com sucesso. Os blocos de acrílico são usados para que tenha uma padronização dos canais simulados. Objetivo: Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo comparar as limas Reciproc Blue e V-File, após o seu segundo uso. Métodos: foram utilizados 40 blocos de acrílico, divididos em quatro grupos (n=10) de acordo com o número de usos de cada instrumento: REC1, REC2, VF1 e VF2. Antes do preparo do canal radicular, a patência dos canais foi verificada com uma lima K #10. Imagens fotográficas do pré e pós-operatório foram obtidas para posterior sobreposição e análise em software de imagem (Adobe Photoshop CS5.1). A análise estatística foi feita utilizando teste T e o teste Mann Whitney. Resultados: mais resina foi removida do lado externo no começo da curva pelo instrumento Reciproc Blue em todos os pontos examinados (p < 0.05). Em relação a distância de transporte do canal, não houve diferenças significativas em nenhum dos pontos. O instrumento Reciproc Blue apresentou preparos mais largos e menos conservadores. Conclusão: Ambos os instrumentos (Reciproc Blue e V-File) são seguros para o preparo de canais curvos, oferecendo uma limpeza e modelagem eficaz. Contanto o instrumento V-File apresentou preparos mais conservadores.Research, Society and Development2021-11-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2287010.33448/rsd-v10i15.22870Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 15; e177101522870Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 15; e177101522870Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 15; e1771015228702525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22870/20219Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Clara Santos Silva; Anna Elisa Souza Simeão; Caio Cesar Souza; Matheus Almeida Rodrigues; Edeilton Santana de Oliveira Júnior e Bezerra; Adolfo de Matos de Carvalho ; Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeirohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Maria Clara SantosSimeão, Anna Elisa SouzaSouza, Caio CesarRodrigues, Matheus AlmeidaBezerra, Edeilton Santana de Oliveira Júnior e Carvalho , Adolfo de Matos de Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva 2021-12-06T10:13:53Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22870Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:41:54.818349Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the shaping ability of two reciprocating systems: Reciproc Blue x V-File
Evaluación de la capacidad de modelado de dos sistemas alternativos: Reciproc Blue x V-File
Avaliação da capacidade de modelagem de dois sistemas reciprocantes: Reciproc Blue x V-File
title Evaluation of the shaping ability of two reciprocating systems: Reciproc Blue x V-File
spellingShingle Evaluation of the shaping ability of two reciprocating systems: Reciproc Blue x V-File
Silva, Maria Clara Santos
Root canals
Nickel titanium
Canal preparation.
Conductos radiculares
Níquel titanio
Preparación de canales.
Canais radiculares
Níquel titânio
Preparo do canal.
title_short Evaluation of the shaping ability of two reciprocating systems: Reciproc Blue x V-File
title_full Evaluation of the shaping ability of two reciprocating systems: Reciproc Blue x V-File
title_fullStr Evaluation of the shaping ability of two reciprocating systems: Reciproc Blue x V-File
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the shaping ability of two reciprocating systems: Reciproc Blue x V-File
title_sort Evaluation of the shaping ability of two reciprocating systems: Reciproc Blue x V-File
author Silva, Maria Clara Santos
author_facet Silva, Maria Clara Santos
Simeão, Anna Elisa Souza
Souza, Caio Cesar
Rodrigues, Matheus Almeida
Bezerra, Edeilton Santana de Oliveira Júnior e
Carvalho , Adolfo de Matos de
Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva
author_role author
author2 Simeão, Anna Elisa Souza
Souza, Caio Cesar
Rodrigues, Matheus Almeida
Bezerra, Edeilton Santana de Oliveira Júnior e
Carvalho , Adolfo de Matos de
Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Maria Clara Santos
Simeão, Anna Elisa Souza
Souza, Caio Cesar
Rodrigues, Matheus Almeida
Bezerra, Edeilton Santana de Oliveira Júnior e
Carvalho , Adolfo de Matos de
Limoeiro, Ana Grasiela da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Root canals
Nickel titanium
Canal preparation.
Conductos radiculares
Níquel titanio
Preparación de canales.
Canais radiculares
Níquel titânio
Preparo do canal.
topic Root canals
Nickel titanium
Canal preparation.
Conductos radiculares
Níquel titanio
Preparación de canales.
Canais radiculares
Níquel titânio
Preparo do canal.
description Introduction: Cleaning and shaping are extremely important steps in the instrumentation of root canals so that endodontic treatment can be carried out with excellence. With the aim of optimizing working time and presenting a high-quality material, NiTi (nickel-titanium) files have been developed to ensure successful endodontic treatment. Acrylic blocks are used to obtain a pattern of simulated canals. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare Reciproc Blue and V-File files after their second use. Methods: 40 acrylic blocks were used, divided into four groups (n=10) according to the number of times each instrument was used: REC1, REC2, VF1 and VF2. Prior to root canal preparation, the patency of the root canal was checked with a #10 K file. Pre- and postoperative photographic images were created in image processing software (Adobe Photoshop CS5.1) for later superimposition and analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test and Mann Whitney test. Results: At all points studied, the Reciproc Blue instrument removed more resin from the outside at the beginning of the curve (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences at any of the points in terms of transport distance from the canal. The Reciproc Blue instrument had wider and less conservative preparations. Conclusion: Both instruments (Reciproc Blue and V-File) are safe for curved canal preparation and provide effective cleaning and shaping. However, the V-File instrument had more conservative preparations.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22870
10.33448/rsd-v10i15.22870
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22870
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i15.22870
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/22870/20219
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 15; e177101522870
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 15; e177101522870
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 15; e177101522870
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052696358813696